wouldn't the Song of Solomon be considered porn back then?

The says to knock yer wives sister up if yer wife cant produce. Its the funniest book ever. Not having a beard is damnation in that jam. They talk about witches too.

that first bit about getting someone else pregnant, isn't that standard fare for Kings?

Judethz wanks off to it every day.

Its why he goes through so many bibles.

Pages keep getting all clagged up.

…19 Yet she multiplied her promiscuity, remembering the days of her youth, when she had prostituted herself in the land of Egypt 20 and lusted after their lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of stallions. 21 So you revisited the indecency of your youth, when the Egyptians caressed your bosom and pressed your young breasts...

Ez3kiel has this verse about sluts craving massive cock and big cumshots like pornstars. YHWH is down with the graphic fuckfest...

The Bible is not the fairy tale some knuckleheads think it is.

The Book tells the dirty truth about people.

No, because it's not porn.

Fruit trays never were so sexual, though.

It's the most erotic thing you'll ever read that has not one word that can be proven to be erotic, or can it?

;-)

Last Edited by anastasis888 on 06/12/2019 12:28 AM

Nothing is outdated or irrelevant.

People then were just like people now

and we certainly are not any better or smarter...

I never knew about that verse actually, wow. In the Bible's defense though it's talking about that behavior as being evil, but that still is over the top imo!

to be fair, that's a good point.

Parts of Ezekiel read like purest smut, and they are meant to because Ezekiel is prophesying against those who had committed spiritual Porneia against God's covenant.

Not only is it the starkest smut, it's in a slang language at that.

You'd have to retranslate it from King James language to gutter street slang to get the feel of how raw Ezekiel is speaking in the original.

He's just getting straight up in your grill, no holds barred.

It definitely utilizes erotic imagery. The question really is, is it obscene or base enough to be considered porn? But if you can't admit it's erotic I guess yeah you'll never admit it's porn.

it's the context there that doesn't make that part porn, it's when you're reading about it continually in SOS, so that you start imagining the breasts that are like doves, etc.

No, pornography (I mean true vulgar writing about fornication) is the profane abuse and inversion of sex.

Song of Songs is actual Holistic Tantra.

To the untrained eye, they may look similar, but they lead to completely opposite directions.

There is nothing 'overt' in Song of Songs, but ain't it though? ;-)

Last Edited by anastasis888 on 06/12/2019 12:44 AM

hmmmm... well that's actually a very compelling argument. Jury's still out in my book but I'll have to think about it some more.

There are 8 Chapters for the 8 spoked wheel of the year, by the way.

Song of Songs is a perfect Tantric Spell. Actually, it's the Tantric Spell.

Witches have tried to invert it and manipulate it for centuries in attempts to thieve its consciousness and postures.

But there's nothing like the real thing, baby.

You know the Stag Lord and Moon Goddess and what not that the fat women do who dance around in circles?

Yes, that's bastardized Song of Songs from Gerald Gardner (and especially Crowley, who intentionally wrote ritual inversions of Song of Songs).

I cannot even begin to tell you how many mysteries are held in that one small volume. It's bottled lightning.

Last Edited by anastasis888 on 06/12/2019 12:50 AM

which came first though, the Bible's version or the Hindi version?

The Perso-Indians who settled India mostly took the eastern tantric philosophies from Babylon. Tantra is not unique to Hinduism. Hindu tantra is a bastardization of true tantra. Not all tantra is created equal.

You must understand that Song of Songs is not only tantric sexuality and yoga postures, but tantric combat.

Pop tantra today is really watered down mush. It doesn't actually do what tantra is supposed to do, which is edify the marriage bond into an invincible fortress of power.

Yes, I'm being serious. There's actually a Logos to sex, a meaning to it, a story to it. And that's what is lost today.

And the heptacontagon is where I would begin to explain how sex can be turned into a weapon based on Song of Songs.

But Song of Songs is dialectical sexual-spiritual warfare at every level in direct opposition to Babylon and specifically Baal.

Song of Songs is on such a high level of consciousness that it would simply blow the minds of the average church goer to catch the drift of even part of it.

That's why nobody teaches it, because nobody knows what it is, or how to use it. All they know is it appears to be some love poem about something.

They have no clue. It is an advanced, complete sexual Kabbalah combat manual. And they wouldn't believe it if you told them.

And that's why Babylon is winning.

You have a Tantric Yoga manual right in your Bible and don't even know it.

Am I suggesting that you have to be on par with the witches of ancient Babylon?

No, I'm saying you have to be better.

Last Edited by anastasis888 on 06/12/2019 01:35 AM

I like the part about ohola and oholibah having sex with men hung like horses

Porn is a human concept. God made the genitalia and He can talk about anything He wants

The only way you could fully experience the consciousness and energies in Song of Songs is to have a partner wack enough to practice with you.

Yes, I mean literally practice Song of Solomon postures and pathworkings. And it would have to be somebody as crazy as the Shulamite who would go that distance and actually make that ascension.

And they don't make many that crazy. I guess a porn star might be that crazy, but we're talking about getting your wife that crazy. In this world, porn stars don't exist anymore, because your wife is killing the porn star. No sweet little ladies at home here, this is all the great unknown.

If you're going to enter into the tantric world of Song of Songs experimentally, then you had better be ready to leave everything you have ever known behind and transform your entire reality.

Not crazy, CRAZY. Like, Cosmic Orgasm crazy.

Yeah, that crazy.

Last Edited by anastasis888 on 06/12/2019 01:48 AM

It may seem truly bizarre to the modern ear that sex could be seen a martial art, but, if you truly have the bond of love between the husband and wife, their love toward one another is going to connect them together at some crazy levels.

What I'm wanting people to do is get 10 times crazier and learn the Craft of Solomon and re-establish the Logos of Love.

It's the Spiral Dance from here to eternity. And there's nothing else like it. It is the Mystery of Life itself.

Last Edited by anastasis888 on 06/12/2019 02:02 AM

No, it is using such vulgar language to describe the spiritual nature of Israel and Judah.

The Divine communicates in ways that are best suited to understand the emotion behind the meaning.

You have to understand, it is sinful, equally or perhaps of greater sin, to be too zealous then too lax.

"High Mindedness" is a person who places their own morality above the Heavenly Fathers(coobaptistsugh).

I doubt any of the Prohibitionists will make it through the pearly gates.

At a farmers festival there where a few. A younger relative that is interested in religion/spirituality/Christ, wanted to go talk to them, but I quickly corrected them and told them the prohibitionists where wicked high minded individuals, that thought they knew better then Christ and the Heavenly Father. You should of seen the look of shame on the prohibitionists faces.

When laid out using the Scripture and Gospel's, they can't defend their evil doing.

You have to remember "sex was designed to be a special gift for married couples", to paraphrase scripture.

Promiscuous sex is bad, and damages the proverbial heart. Everytime a person, man or woman, engages in sex, they bond with the person, and due to the failed nature of the bonding, a piece of their proverbial heart is damaged.

Making it that much harder each time, to form a real bond when they want to settle down.

No.

Sirs, what you both have said about the scriptures and God is both ignorant, unjustified and abominable. If you were genuinely seeking the truth you would read the scriptures carefully for yourself to get acquainted with it before coming to any judgement about it. Historically, no person has ever come to the conclusions about the bible which you both have after examining it! This includes what “seems” to be in your minds contradictions.
God, when He made war against the ungodly nations did so after making it clear that He hated them for their wicked works. For they were committing acts of child sacrifice, the worship of demons, idols and the host of heaven; how they were engrossed in homosexuality, prostitution and temple prostitution, incest and they were steeped into the occult, in witchcraft of every sort, and mediums. Our Holy Lord made it perfectly clear to Israel that they had to be destroyed so that Israel would hate their wickedness and their sins and so that they would not learn their evil ways and forsake God's Holiness. The whole history of Israel and the any troubles they went through and suffered, as written in the bible proved without doubt how right and justified God was to destroy the nations of the giants and the heathen nations.

Now, to answer your question about the song of Solomon this is what should be understood: As the psalms were written as songs by King David, Moses and others, so too was the Songs of Solomon. The book is both a song and a play. For we can see that there are parts in each scene for actors or characters, so that we can observe how there are the two main characters: the Groom and his espousal.

In the play of this song we see there is romance and tragedy; there is courtship and tension from the two main actors; then we see appeals to the audience and other actors. The other actors have very short roles in the play.
It is said that this book is about Christ and the Church, as well as making other similar parallels. However, King Solomon makes it clear that the song and play is about him! Why this is, is still not understood. The following is my opinion only:
Could Solomon have written this “musical” during the early stages of his reign as a way of introducing his potential wives to him before he met them? Was it his way to endear any bride to him, so that he could command their respect, their attention and their high regard of him, when they met? So, in other words, there is an actor protraying him - (or is he the main actor), and another actress who plays the part of the potentially new wife!

No kate Bush video?

Better to have love songs in your holy book than constant wars, gang rape, vengeance, and genocide.

Romantic intimacy is a gift from the TRINITY, not porn.

This thread need a Kate Bush Video