|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
wouldn't the Song of Solomon be considered porn back then?
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Coward |
|
Post Content
|
No, because it's not porn.
Fruit trays never were so sexual, though.
It's the most erotic thing you'll ever read that has not one word that can be proven to be erotic, or can it?
;-)
Quoting: anastasis888 It definitely utilizes erotic imagery. The question really is, is it obscene or base enough to be considered porn? But if you can't admit it's erotic I guess yeah you'll never admit it's porn. No, porngraphy (I mean true vulgar writing about fornication) is the profane abuse and inversion of sex. Song of Songs is actual Holistic Tantra. To the untrained eye, they may look similar, but they lead to completely opposite directions. There is nothing 'overt' in Song of Songs, but ain't it though? ;-) hmmmm... well that's actually a very compelling argument. Jury's still out in my book but I'll have to think about it some more.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
