|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
wouldn't the Song of Solomon be considered porn back then?
|
|
Poster Handle
|
anastasis888 |
|
Post Content
|
No, because it's not porn.
Fruit trays never were so sexual, though.
It's the most erotic thing you'll ever read that has not one word that can be proven to be erotic, or can it?
;-)
Quoting: anastasis888 It definitely utilizes erotic imagery. The question really is, is it obscene or base enough to be considered porn? But if you can't admit it's erotic I guess yeah you'll never admit it's porn. No, porngraphy (I mean true vulgar writing about fornication) is the profane abuse and inversion of sex. Song of Songs is actual Holistic Tantra. To the untrained eye, they may look similar, but they lead to completely opposite directions. There is nothing 'overt' in Song of Songs, but ain't it though? ;-) hmmmm... well that's actually a very compelling argument. Jury's still out in my book but I'll have to think about it some more. There are 8 Chapters for the 8 spoked wheel of the year, by the way. Song of Songs is a perfect Tantric Spell. Actually, it's the Tantric Spell. Witches have tried to invert it and manipulate it for centuries in attempts to thieve its consciousness and postures. But there's nothing like the real thing, baby. You know the Stag Lord and Moon Goddess and what not that the fat women do who dance around in circles? Yes, that's bastardized Song of Songs from Gerald Gardner (and especially Crowley, who intentionally wrote ritual inversions of Song of Songs). I cannot even begin to tell you how many mysteries are held in that one small volume. It's bottled lightning.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
