...
Contempt for what?
A buncha of globalist snowflakey self proclaimed corporate
judges?
UK and its sovereign City of London implementing NWO fascism?
Oh buggar!
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70211088 Contempt of decency, intelligence, morality, ethics, proportionality, accountability oh the list goes on Swedie. On & on........
Pleas Donald, please let me come over & cause more shit in the US.
Lol. Not a chance.
I could easily agree with your first Point (if I watched the bloke more often), but not for the same reasons you do.
Since when is OFFENDING someone a crime?
It´s just a matter of perception.
We don´t have to honour the dishonourable.
The Courts show us contempt,time and again.
The gov shows us contempt,time and again.
There are boundaries, you see.
When someone is throwing shit at me, I don´t need to thank him and honour him.
Take note, that I´m talking in general here of course.
I don´t live in UK and only speak for myself.
Anyways, good luck with everything!
P.S Did Tommy want to go to Murka?
Oh dear.
LOL
Hey, we’re continue to agree on things, we’re currently on Meatloaf’s 2 out of 3 but I think I’ll aim for Queen as I want it all.
Yes, in writing & by sending a video that he also gave to ‘twatty’ Alex Jones. Here is one of the articles regarding his ‘Begging Plea’.
[
link to www.google.co.uk (secure)]
Here is the vid embed:
[
link to youtu.be (secure)]
Here is the legitimate rap sheet:
[
link to www.the-round.co.uk (secure)]
Sorry Swedie, I didn’t address your reply really, was just satisfied with what I ‘wanted’ to say as opposed to extending to you the courtesy of addressing your points.
BUT DO SEE MY REPLY ABOVE.
Your question was ‘when is it a crime to offend someone’.
I’ll put aside the actual convictions on the rap sheet as I do know what you mean so I won’t flounce around it.
As he was the head of the organisation EDL (English Defence League) his videos, paraphernalia & rousing speeches were not only ‘inciting’ his members to engage in violent illegal activity but in many cases actually ‘call to arms’ to do so.
It SHOUL NEVER be a crime to simply offend, if you’re offended then fine, go right ahead & be offended. But as the head of an organisation with an active ‘member base’ you are implicit when you & your marketing lend itself to commit crimes.
I’m not sure on the ‘inciting’ legalities in Sweden but over here it’s pretty clean cut although you would think a real ‘grey area’.
All your other points I wholeheartedly agree with. His whole structure was to incite ‘direct action’. The organisation itself actually didn’t bother too much with the simple ‘offence’ strategy.
An interesting point is also, and these are my thoughts & in no way a collective opinion based on any material whatsoever, but.........
He was very well aware of perjury & contempt legalities for many reasons, not excluding he was currently guilty of a previous act & has legal representation advising him for rallies, public appearances & publicity stunts.
There is a strong chance that his behaviour & footage collection & immediate distribution via Facebook live could very well have caused the collapse of the entire case he was there ‘supposedly’ to highlight with disgust.
He would have known this, I would hazard a guess the adjudicators also thought this could be his motive. I am unsure if this was a discussion during proceedings but if not then there must be a reason for it.
Maybe making that accusation would have damaged the prosecutions case for some reason or maybe as others say he is a ‘plant’ & they couldn’t risk exposure of that getting out, who knows.
But something more is at hand that’s for sure.
