Speed of light is so small compared to size of galaxy | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76839402 United States 07/22/2019 02:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77838388 Germany 07/22/2019 02:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77838388 Germany 07/22/2019 02:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77747519 Moldova 07/22/2019 02:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
G. House User ID: 77513204 United States 07/22/2019 02:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | A few billion years ago an ancient civilization (that the origin and history of is no longer known) built a large number of "wormholes" throughout the galaxy. So although it's possible to go faster than light, it's not really necessary. Why don't you know this? They'll make us aware of this if disclosure ever happens. "Everybody lies." |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74139312 United States 07/22/2019 02:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | the speed of light is relative, which means the speed of light always travels the speed of light, even if it is coming from something already moving at the speed of light... now you're going 2x the speed of light, if observing from the origin of that light. sooo in reality the speed of light is infinite that's my take lol |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77839769 United States 07/22/2019 03:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Light is SLOW!!! This video shows a wonderful, graphic explanation, even though it's in the sci-fi realm, it's all we have to go by, but makes a good analysis. But that's NOTHING compared to Hyperspace engines. Those will move you across the galaxy in mere seconds or minutes! Just a trip to the closest star to Earth (besides our Sun) at some 4 light years away could be reached in only 14 seconds by the Millennium Falcon. Excellent video on MANY things, not just spacecraft, here! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77704522 Iceland 07/22/2019 03:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77843042 United States 07/22/2019 04:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So according to Einstein space is limited by the speed of light, meaning that would be the fastest we can go. one light year is 186,000 miles per second or 6 trillion miles in one year, essentially thats how much ground we can cover in on year. However considering the size of our galaxy milky way is 105000 light years and it would take us 26000 light years just to be out of the galaxy.. So meaning if we could go at our fastest potential speed it would still take us 26000 years to be out of this galaxy.. This is so upsetting how much knowledge and information is in the stars yet how unreachable it really is in retrospect.. heck people say we should reach for the stars, do they realize the closest star (not counting sun) is 4 light years away or 25 trillion miles away from us. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75685208 Ok, I'll give you a little secret. You can travel faster than light using repulsion technology( force opposite from gravity). Universe is infinite in space and time so you can never reach the end of it. There are more civilizations out there than all grains of sand in all deserts and beaches on Earth. Ridiculous. If so, at least a few million of them would, eons ago have discovered advanced technology and the universe would be FULL of intelligent SIGNALS. Instead.... SILENCE. DEAD COLD SILENCE. Dream on dummy. Why would advanced civilizations use radio waves as communication? If they can FTL travel wouldn't you assume they have something a bit faster maybe like entangled particles? Oh PLEASE!!!! Physics is Physics wherever you go. If you believe the ridiculous LIE of evolution, these zillions of civilizations would NOT have jumped from the caves to entangled particles!!! You KNOW it's BULLSHIT. But scifi your head off, if that's what turns you on. Just remember this: scifi is FICTION = NOT FACT |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77841233 United States 07/22/2019 04:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | for light to be a limit there has to be an ether otherwise there is no universal reference, and since an ether is highly unlikely the question when measuring velocity is how does it know. Velocity is relative to something and whatever your something light is always c, so I believe it is a characteristic of how it propagates. Relative to you c is observed in free space. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77396442 It was discovered a few years back that the universal constant, isn't a constant. Both in Earth's history and in our observations of the universe around us, it is not constant. Even the speed of light is different in different areas of the universe. |
Anonymer Feigling User ID: 77841939 Germany 07/22/2019 04:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Fist McKraken User ID: 1520818 United States 07/22/2019 04:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So according to Einstein space is limited by the speed of light, meaning that would be the fastest we can go. one light year is 186,000 miles per second or 6 trillion miles in one year, essentially thats how much ground we can cover in on year. However considering the size of our galaxy milky way is 105000 light years and it would take us 26000 light years just to be out of the galaxy.. So meaning if we could go at our fastest potential speed it would still take us 26000 years to be out of this galaxy.. This is so upsetting how much knowledge and information is in the stars yet how unreachable it really is in retrospect.. heck people say we should reach for the stars, do they realize the closest star (not counting sun) is 4 light years away or 25 trillion miles away from us. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75685208 Ok, I'll give you a little secret. You can travel faster than light using repulsion technology( force opposite from gravity). Universe is infinite in space and time so you can never reach the end of it. There are more civilizations out there than all grains of sand in all deserts and beaches on Earth. No it's not. Yes you can. The observable universe has a fake horizon. Similar to Rindler horizon The expansion is not from dark energy Expansion = change in mass X time X SoL Change in mass is due to many factors such as partial decay Loss of mass = loss of gravity = faster time= shorter ruler. Oh, you're willing to accept a theoretical model which is beyond our ability to test? I thought scientific-minded people liked to deal with observable facts. Here's a brief paper on the observable limits of the cosmos and mutiple failed theoretical models which were attempts at a way out of the implications of a finite universe. [link to www.leaderu.com] |
Anonymer Feigling User ID: 77841939 Germany 07/22/2019 04:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | At what speed the universe is expanding, investigations to date yield contradictory results. A new method of measurement was supposed to solve this conflict - it finds out: The truth is in the middle. Astronomers have determined the expansion speed of the universe with a new method. However, the result does not provide the hoped-for solution to a conflict of previous measurements. The new value lies in the middle, as the team around Wendy Freedman reported in an upcoming issue of the journal "The Astrophysical Journal". If the discrepancy between the different measurements can not be dispelled, this could indicate an incompleteness in our model of the universe. Since the Big Bang the universe expands. That's what the American astronomer Edwin Hubble discovered about 100 years ago. At the same time, the cosmos grows like a yeast cake: each raisin in the cake moves away from the others, and the faster the further two raisins are from each other. The speed with which this cosmic yeast cake grows is called in honor of the discoverer Hubble constant. "The Hubble constant is the cosmological parameter that sets the absolute scale, size, and age of the universe," Freedman says in a statement. "It is one of the most direct ways we have to quantify the evolution of the universe." The exact value of the constants is, however, harder to determine than many astronomers had hoped. Hard to measure distances in space One reason is that distances in the vastness of space are difficult to measure. Researchers have developed different standards for this. A very proven regularly uses pulsating stars. The period of these so-called Cepheids is directly related to their luminosity, as studies have shown. The easy-to-measure period of a Cepheid star thus sheds light on how bright it radiates. "The comparison of how bright distant Cepheids appear with the brightness of near-Cepheids enables us to determine how far away the respective home galaxies of the stars are," explains co-author Barry Madore of the Carnegie Institution in Washington. By studying Cepheids in other galaxies, astronomers have determined a value of the Hubble constant of 74 kilometers per second per megaparsec. The astronomical distance unit 1 Megaparsec corresponds to 3.26 million light years, ie the distance the light travels in 3.26 million years. A galaxy at a distance of 1 megaparsec is therefore 74 kilometers away from us every second, a double-distance galaxy twice as fast. Emotion beats reason Don't let it be that way |
Anonymer Feigling User ID: 77841939 Germany 07/22/2019 04:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Anonymer Feigling At what speed the universe is expanding, investigations to date yield contradictory results. A new method of measurement was supposed to solve this conflict - it finds out: The truth is in the middle. Quoting: Anonymer Feigling Astronomers have determined the expansion speed of the universe with a new method. However, the result does not provide the hoped-for solution to a conflict of previous measurements. The new value lies in the middle, as the team around Wendy Freedman reported in an upcoming issue of the journal "The Astrophysical Journal". If the discrepancy between the different measurements can not be dispelled, this could indicate an incompleteness in our model of the universe. Since the Big Bang the universe expands. That's what the American astronomer Edwin Hubble discovered about 100 years ago. At the same time, the cosmos grows like a yeast cake: each raisin in the cake moves away from the others, and the faster the further two raisins are from each other. The speed with which this cosmic yeast cake grows is called in honor of the discoverer Hubble constant. "The Hubble constant is the cosmological parameter that sets the absolute scale, size, and age of the universe," Freedman says in a statement. "It is one of the most direct ways we have to quantify the evolution of the universe." The exact value of the constants is, however, harder to determine than many astronomers had hoped. Hard to measure distances in space One reason is that distances in the vastness of space are difficult to measure. Researchers have developed different standards for this. A very proven regularly uses pulsating stars. The period of these so-called Cepheids is directly related to their luminosity, as studies have shown. The easy-to-measure period of a Cepheid star thus sheds light on how bright it radiates. "The comparison of how bright distant Cepheids appear with the brightness of near-Cepheids enables us to determine how far away the respective home galaxies of the stars are," explains co-author Barry Madore of the Carnegie Institution in Washington. By studying Cepheids in other galaxies, astronomers have determined a value of the Hubble constant of 74 kilometers per second per megaparsec. The astronomical distance unit 1 Megaparsec corresponds to 3.26 million light years, ie the distance the light travels in 3.26 million years. A galaxy at a distance of 1 megaparsec is therefore 74 kilometers away from us every second, a double-distance galaxy twice as fast. The team around Freedman has therefore devised a third method for measuring the Hubble constant. They used the Hubble Space Telescope to study so-called red giants in other galaxies. These are stars that swell to gigantic proportions at the end of their life cycle. Red giants arise when a star has used up its main fuel, the hydrogen, and begins to burn helium. When helium burning ignites, this helium flash is accompanied by a reorganization of the star. Freedman's team took advantage of his analysis that red giants all shine brightly just after the helium flash. If one seeks out only red giants in this phase, the apparent brightness on the earthly firmament yields again their absolute distance, similar to that of the Cepheids. In this way, the scientists come to a value of 69.8 kilometers per second per megaparsec - and are thus between the other two methods. Emotion beats reason Don't let it be that way |
E=MCSquared&Compassed User ID: 77842419 United States 07/22/2019 04:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72777131 United States 07/22/2019 04:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76555114 United Kingdom 07/22/2019 05:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So according to Einstein space is limited by the speed of light, meaning that would be the fastest we can go. one light year is 186,000 miles per second or 6 trillion miles in one year, essentially thats how much ground we can cover in on year. However considering the size of our galaxy milky way is 105000 light years and it would take us 26000 light years just to be out of the galaxy.. So meaning if we could go at our fastest potential speed it would still take us 26000 years to be out of this galaxy.. This is so upsetting how much knowledge and information is in the stars yet how unreachable it really is in retrospect.. heck people say we should reach for the stars, do they realize the closest star (not counting sun) is 4 light years away or 25 trillion miles away from us. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75685208 Makes you think doesn't it... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72774578 United States 07/22/2019 05:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Fist McKraken User ID: 2671459 United States 07/22/2019 06:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 49206774 United States 07/22/2019 06:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 51763838 United States 07/22/2019 07:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77798682 Ok, I'll give you a little secret. You can travel faster than light using repulsion technology( force opposite from gravity). Universe is infinite in space and time so you can never reach the end of it. There are more civilizations out there than all grains of sand in all deserts and beaches on Earth. No it's not. Yes you can. The observable universe has a fake horizon. Similar to Rindler horizon The expansion is not from dark energy Expansion = change in mass X time X SoL Change in mass is due to many factors such as partial decay Loss of mass = loss of gravity = faster time= shorter ruler. Oh, you're willing to accept a theoretical model which is beyond our ability to test? I thought scientific-minded people liked to deal with observable facts. Here's a brief paper on the observable limits of the cosmos and mutiple failed theoretical models which were attempts at a way out of the implications of a finite universe. [link to www.leaderu.com] Beyond what your pea brain can test maybe. There is no new theory here. The theories used are already proven. Science just need to apply the math. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76725771 United States 07/22/2019 07:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Personally I like to ascribe to the Douglas Adams theory, that if you divide all of humanity that has ever been and ever will be by the infinity of the universe, you arrive at a number so close to zero as to be zero ... therefore, we do not exist. |
Fist McKraken User ID: 2671459 United States 07/22/2019 07:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The observable universe has a fake horizon. Similar to Rindler horizon The expansion is not from dark energy Expansion = change in mass X time X SoL Change in mass is due to many factors such as partial decay Loss of mass = loss of gravity = faster time= shorter ruler. Oh, you're willing to accept a theoretical model which is beyond our ability to test? I thought scientific-minded people liked to deal with observable facts. Here's a brief paper on the observable limits of the cosmos and mutiple failed theoretical models which were attempts at a way out of the implications of a finite universe. [link to www.leaderu.com] Beyond what your pea brain can test maybe. There is no new theory here. The theories used are already proven. Science just need to apply the math. Qualitative research is semi-structured, largely deductive and explores hypotheses in order to build a theory for uncertain and immature concepts. Quantitative research is highly structured, confirms hypotheses, and is largely inductive. Qualitative theorizing is merely intellectual play without the structured verifiability of quantification. General Relativity was not in any sense proven until observationally verified within acceptable ranges of falsifiability. But then, you're a premature kinda guy, arent you? Last Edited by Fist in the Box on 07/22/2019 07:50 PM |
Wookiee666 User ID: 62421844 United States 07/22/2019 07:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So according to Einstein space is limited by the speed of light, meaning that would be the fastest we can go. one light year is 186,000 miles per second or 6 trillion miles in one year, essentially thats how much ground we can cover in on year. However considering the size of our galaxy milky way is 105000 light years and it would take us 26000 light years just to be out of the galaxy.. So meaning if we could go at our fastest potential speed it would still take us 26000 years to be out of this galaxy.. This is so upsetting how much knowledge and information is in the stars yet how unreachable it really is in retrospect.. heck people say we should reach for the stars, do they realize the closest star (not counting sun) is 4 light years away or 25 trillion miles away from us. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75685208 Ok, I'll give you a little secret. You can travel faster than light using repulsion technology( force opposite from gravity). Universe is infinite in space and time so you can never reach the end of it. There are more civilizations out there than all grains of sand in all deserts and beaches on Earth. Ridiculous. If so, at least a few million of them would, eons ago have discovered advanced technology and the universe would be FULL of intelligent SIGNALS. Instead.... SILENCE. DEAD COLD SILENCE. Dream on dummy. Except that, maybe even with the most advanced tech, interstellar travel just isn’t possible. No ftl. No warp. No inter dimensional travel. And who the fuck r u 2 b calling anyone “dummy”? Last Edited by JustSomeGuy_42 on 07/22/2019 07:52 PM Warning: JustSomeGuy_42 is a publicly confessed unvaxxed neophiliac . If the number 666 is considered evil. then technically, 25.8069758 is the root of all evil. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2590977 United States 07/22/2019 07:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Its really sad when people limit themselves to what we think we know. Wormholes or portals can link you to any point in the universe instantly. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72774578 No one is limiting shit on this thread. So no sadness needed. The point of this thread is simply saying. We aren't going to get anywhere in this universe physically without either wormhold tapping a virtual simulation of some kind i.e. getting out of the matrix... all technologies we don't have. The days of strapping a rocket on the back of a looney toons character that says TNT are over. Solar sails are over. We aren't getting anywhere here going the speed of light. Light speed isn't even something we should strive for. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 53944167 United States 07/22/2019 08:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Fist McKraken User ID: 2671459 United States 07/22/2019 08:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 51763838 The observable universe has a fake horizon. Similar to Rindler horizon The expansion is not from dark energy Expansion = change in mass X time X SoL Change in mass is due to many factors such as partial decay Loss of mass = loss of gravity = faster time= shorter ruler. Oh, you're willing to accept a theoretical model which is beyond our ability to test? I thought scientific-minded people liked to deal with observable facts. Here's a brief paper on the observable limits of the cosmos and mutiple failed theoretical models which were attempts at a way out of the implications of a finite universe. [link to www.leaderu.com] Beyond what your pea brain can test maybe. There is no new theory here. The theories used are already proven. Science just need to apply the math. Qualitative research is semi-structured, largely deductive and explores hypotheses in order to build a theory for uncertain and immature concepts. Quantitative research is highly structured, confirms hypotheses, and is largely inductive. Qualitative theorizing is merely intellectual play without the structured verifiability of quantification. General Relativity was not in any sense proven until observationally verified within acceptable ranges of falsifiability. But then, you're a premature kinda guy, arent you? [link to www.leaderu.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71388910 United States 07/22/2019 09:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Victor Vectors User ID: 71388910 United States 07/22/2019 09:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77758415 United States 07/22/2019 10:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Personally I like to ascribe to the Douglas Adams theory, that if you divide all of humanity that has ever been and ever will be by the infinity of the universe, you arrive at a number so close to zero as to be zero ... therefore, we do not exist. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76725771 And of course that fact is the key to the infinite improbability drive. [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] |