Was the moon landing faked? Poll | |
Halcyon Dayz, FCD User ID: 76260827 Netherlands 07/09/2019 06:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thats not infact correct, i believe at that time the USSR population was starving, the usa supplied them with huge amount of wheat round about 1969 i believe. Quoting: Kiwi Coward 75703785 We need facts, not believes. In fact, the USSR had record grain harvests in the late 60s. Later they wanted to increase their beef production so they bought fodder on the international market. Also Chhina and japan would have noticed the lander leg base thingy still on the moon, and those rovers,.so usa must have gone there. Quoting: Kiwi Coward 75703785 "lander leg base thingy"? I can tell you're very knowledgeable about Apollo. They only would have noticed them if they went looking with equipment capable of seeing them. Both Japanese and Indian probes detected disturbances on the right site. JAXA confirmed that the local topology as recorded by Apollo 15 does indeed exist on that site. Nope. A rock, which never was one of the rocks, turned out not being one of the rocks, Well, duh. Thousands of scientific paper have been published on the Moon samples. NONE OF THEM casts any doubt on them being from the Moon. Reaching for the sky makes you taller. Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans. |
Agent MIB User ID: 77776495 Philippines 07/09/2019 06:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Or, how about BATTERIES. We all remember battery technology was terrible back then. How did the ROVER and LUNAR MODULE run on BATTERIES in sub-zero temperatures? The Batteries would be responsible to produce HEAT inside the LUNAR MODULE which would drain them in a couple minutes; BUT, somehow, they kept everyone warm and the ROVER was able to travel many, many miles on batteries that were frozen on the Moon. What Gives? Hmm wondered about those batteries, they must have had hundreds of them, to run all the cooling, environmental setup, lights etc, pumps , communications, and they must have weighed a ton cause there was no lithium batts in 1969. still im no fang dangle nasa scientist. The word is FUEL CELLS, not batteries. They used their LOX and LH2 for powering the command module. You are born with the truth, then taught a lie. |
Agent MIB User ID: 77776495 Philippines 07/09/2019 06:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Before I vote answer me this. How did the tin cans go through the Van Allen radiation belt when we cannot do that today? Quoting: Mukk1234 they went AROUND them dummy. Apparently that is correct, they went round them says Astronaut Bean, i would wonder though how much fuel was required to steer around those large parabolic shaped rad belts, but im no fang dangle nasa scientist,. Why did Armstrong say parrots cant fly very well, and there is much left undone. No i saw an interview where they went Through it..as he was spueing BS ..he said he saw like lights,flashes when his eyes were closed...the Astronaut said...he was pretty much making it up on the spot...was funny to watch the guy making up stories on the spot... Good B Ser... It was determined that the Apollo astronauts experienced this phenomena. It was due to cosmic radiation effecting their visual cortex. I'll simply ask, which GLPers have personally met and asked former Apollo astronauts questions? I had that opportunity in late 1970's with Alan Shepard and have a signed "lunar golf ball" from him. Last Edited by Agent MIB on 07/09/2019 06:53 AM You are born with the truth, then taught a lie. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76708078 Canada 07/09/2019 07:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It is a fact that rockets cannot work in the vacuum of space. Read through the thread. Not a shred of evidence if rockets going into spaceship Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76708078 Thread: Now that we have realized that rockets don’t work in space, what’s next on the bucket list? Idiot...... You still can’t prove that rockets work in space. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75703785 New Zealand 07/09/2019 07:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Or, how about BATTERIES. We all remember battery technology was terrible back then. How did the ROVER and LUNAR MODULE run on BATTERIES in sub-zero temperatures? The Batteries would be responsible to produce HEAT inside the LUNAR MODULE which would drain them in a couple minutes; BUT, somehow, they kept everyone warm and the ROVER was able to travel many, many miles on batteries that were frozen on the Moon. What Gives? Hmm wondered about those batteries, they must have had hundreds of them, to run all the cooling, environmental setup, lights etc, pumps , communications, and they must have weighed a ton cause there was no lithium batts in 1969. still im no fang dangle nasa scientist. The word is FUEL CELLS, not batteries. They used their LOX and LH2 for powering the command module. WRONG. Power was provided by two 36-volt silver-zinc potassium hydroxide non-rechargeable batteries with a capacity of 121 A·h each (a total of 242 A·h), yielding a range of 57 miles (92 km).[14] These were used to power the drive and steering motors and also a 36-volt utility outlet mounted on the front of the LRV to power the communications relay unit or the TV camera. LRV batteries and electronics were passively cooled, using change-of-phase wax thermal capacitor packages and reflective, upward-facing radiating surfaces. While driving, radiators were covered with mylar blankets to minimize dust accumulation. When stopped, the astronauts would open the blankets, and manually remove excess dust from the cooling surfaces with hand brushes. [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75703785 New Zealand 07/09/2019 07:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: morcomanifes Or, how about BATTERIES. We all remember battery technology was terrible back then. How did the ROVER and LUNAR MODULE run on BATTERIES in sub-zero temperatures? The Batteries would be responsible to produce HEAT inside the LUNAR MODULE which would drain them in a couple minutes; BUT, somehow, they kept everyone warm and the ROVER was able to travel many, many miles on batteries that were frozen on the Moon. What Gives? Hmm wondered about those batteries, they must have had hundreds of them, to run all the cooling, environmental setup, lights etc, pumps , communications, and they must have weighed a ton cause there was no lithium batts in 1969. still im no fang dangle nasa scientist. The word is FUEL CELLS, not batteries. They used their LOX and LH2 for powering the command module. WRONG. Power was provided by two 36-volt silver-zinc potassium hydroxide non-rechargeable batteries with a capacity of 121 A·h each (a total of 242 A·h), yielding a range of 57 miles (92 km).[14] These were used to power the drive and steering motors and also a 36-volt utility outlet mounted on the front of the LRV to power the communications relay unit or the TV camera. LRV batteries and electronics were passively cooled, using change-of-phase wax thermal capacitor packages and reflective, upward-facing radiating surfaces. While driving, radiators were covered with mylar blankets to minimize dust accumulation. When stopped, the astronauts would open the blankets, and manually remove excess dust from the cooling surfaces with hand brushes. [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] above BATTERIES powered rover. WRONG lunar lander Power Instead, the Lunar Lander is powered by solar arrays which are wrapped around the body tube. Once landed, the vehicles axis of symmetry will be almost perpendicular to the direction of the Sun ensuring continuously good illumination of the solar cells as the lander rotates with respect to the Sun (due to the rotation of the Moon). Batteries are used to bridge short periods without solar power. Solar power is unavailable in LLO when the lander goes into lunar eclipse and on the ground, when mountain peaks at the horizon cover the Sun. Landing operations will also be conducted relying solely on battery power. [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75703785 New Zealand 07/09/2019 07:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75703785 Hmm wondered about those batteries, they must have had hundreds of them, to run all the cooling, environmental setup, lights etc, pumps , communications, and they must have weighed a ton cause there was no lithium batts in 1969. still im no fang dangle nasa scientist. The word is FUEL CELLS, not batteries. They used their LOX and LH2 for powering the command module. WRONG. Power was provided by two 36-volt silver-zinc potassium hydroxide non-rechargeable batteries with a capacity of 121 A·h each (a total of 242 A·h), yielding a range of 57 miles (92 km).[14] These were used to power the drive and steering motors and also a 36-volt utility outlet mounted on the front of the LRV to power the communications relay unit or the TV camera. LRV batteries and electronics were passively cooled, using change-of-phase wax thermal capacitor packages and reflective, upward-facing radiating surfaces. While driving, radiators were covered with mylar blankets to minimize dust accumulation. When stopped, the astronauts would open the blankets, and manually remove excess dust from the cooling surfaces with hand brushes. [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] above BATTERIES powered rover. WRONG lunar lander Power Instead, the Lunar Lander is powered by solar arrays which are wrapped around the body tube. Once landed, the vehicles axis of symmetry will be almost perpendicular to the direction of the Sun ensuring continuously good illumination of the solar cells as the lander rotates with respect to the Sun (due to the rotation of the Moon). Batteries are used to bridge short periods without solar power. Solar power is unavailable in LLO when the lander goes into lunar eclipse and on the ground, when mountain peaks at the horizon cover the Sun. Landing operations will also be conducted relying solely on battery power. [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] U SAID, They used their LOX and LH2 for powering the command module. IE FLYING THE THING NOT POWERING ON THE FLIPPIN MOON. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75703785 New Zealand 07/09/2019 07:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thats not infact correct, i believe at that time the USSR population was starving, the usa supplied them with huge amount of wheat round about 1969 i believe. Quoting: Kiwi Coward 75703785 We need facts, not believes. In fact, the USSR had record grain harvests in the late 60s. Later they wanted to increase their beef production so they bought fodder on the international market. Also Chhina and japan would have noticed the lander leg base thingy still on the moon, and those rovers,.so usa must have gone there. Quoting: Kiwi Coward 75703785 "lander leg base thingy"? I can tell you're very knowledgeable about Apollo. They only would have noticed them if they went looking with equipment capable of seeing them. Both Japanese and Indian probes detected disturbances on the right site. JAXA confirmed that the local topology as recorded by Apollo 15 does indeed exist on that site. Nope. A rock, which never was one of the rocks, turned out not being one of the rocks, Well, duh. Thousands of scientific paper have been published on the Moon samples. NONE OF THEM casts any doubt on them being from the Moon. haven't started on you yet, but i suggest you recheck your facts, cause im about to discredit your FACTS. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 49312587 United States 07/09/2019 08:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
LHP598 User ID: 77436004 United States 07/09/2019 08:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Before I vote answer me this. How did the tin cans go through the Van Allen radiation belt when we cannot do that today? Quoting: Mukk1234 they went AROUND them dummy. like going around an eggshell belts are spheres moron What kind of belts are you wearing? If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law |
LHP598 User ID: 77436004 United States 07/09/2019 08:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Before I vote answer me this. How did the tin cans go through the Van Allen radiation belt when we cannot do that today? Quoting: Mukk1234 How could they go through the radiation belts but not through the Chernobyl open core? Because different types of radiation are different If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law |
LHP598 User ID: 77436004 United States 07/09/2019 08:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Does Reynolds make that gold colored aluminum foil? I gotta get me some of that. I want to make a kite out of it. I wonder if it would hold? You know, not tear in the wind. What wind is a spacecraft that only ever operates in the vacuum of space going to be exposed to? If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law |
MogwaiHunter PM User ID: 74501514 United States 07/09/2019 08:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | At least in my lifetime they were able to smash something into the moon. Perhaps one day we can recreate this fine achievement. Its very cool that by doing this they discovered water on the moon. Too bad the guys walking on it couldn't figure that out. lol liars. Last Edited by MogwaiHunter PM on 07/09/2019 08:47 AM |
Halcyon Dayz, FCD User ID: 76260827 Netherlands 07/09/2019 08:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thats not infact correct, i believe at that time the USSR population was starving, the usa supplied them with huge amount of wheat round about 1969 i believe. Quoting: Kiwi Coward 75703785 We need facts, not believes. In fact, the USSR had record grain harvests in the late 60s. Later they wanted to increase their beef production so they bought fodder on the international market. Also Chhina and japan would have noticed the lander leg base thingy still on the moon, and those rovers,.so usa must have gone there. Quoting: Kiwi Coward 75703785 "lander leg base thingy"? I can tell you're very knowledgeable about Apollo. They only would have noticed them if they went looking with equipment capable of seeing them. Both Japanese and Indian probes detected disturbances on the right site. JAXA confirmed that the local topology as recorded by Apollo 15 does indeed exist on that site. Nope. A rock, which never was one of the rocks, turned out not being one of the rocks, Well, duh. Thousands of scientific paper have been published on the Moon samples. NONE OF THEM casts any doubt on them being from the Moon. haven't started on you yet, but i suggest you recheck your facts, cause im about to discredit your FACTS. Your a hoaxie. Hoaxies don't have facts. All they have are disinfo, lies, confabulations, and brainfarts. My evidence: every single hoax thread on the internet and the rather blatant fact that they haven't been able to prove ANYTHING of relevance EVER. Scratch a hoaxie, find a scientifically illiterate disinfo victim. Reaching for the sky makes you taller. Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77773332 United States 07/09/2019 09:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The ignorance is mind-numbing. Only someone who wasn't here to witness the actual events from ground level would be leave that it wasn't true. So ask yourself was I there in Florida to watch the Saturn V launch and all of the news coverage? If your answer is no then it it is possible that you don't believe it. I must say that I feel rather dumb even responding to this idiocy and with that I say goodnight. Quoting: scimitar were you there?? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77549776 United States 07/09/2019 09:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Only NASA telescopes can see these images, but no other ones on earth? Really? "As you're well aware, no telescope on Earth can see the leftover descent stages of the Apollo Lunar Modules or anything else Apollo-related. Not even the Hubble Space Telescope can discern evidence of the Apollo landings. The laws of optics define its limits." |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77773332 United States 07/09/2019 10:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77086513 Okay, genius. Tell us why? I'm in the mood to entertain you moontards with facts, evidence, math, and science. Give me something I can tear apart bit by bit to expose your utter stupidity. Are you patriotic? You mean do I love my country? Of course. Do I go to country music concerts in a 10-gallon hat, drink Bud Light, and have a "Don't Tread On Me" bumper sticker on my Ford pickup? Fuck no. Are you pride when the US bombs another overseas country? Are American "Great Accomplishments" important to you? do not lump us all together please many americans want no war do not want to be hated. I think MNAY/Most are against abortion and so many other things portrayed as "American" these days. Wish we could turn back time but then it seems so much of yesteryear was a lie just like today |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77773332 United States 07/09/2019 10:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77076486 Canada 07/09/2019 10:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The lie begins with desire to create a world government. In order to do that, they have to unite humanity. All humans of the world shall have one religion, language, set common morals and most importantly, one single sovereign. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76708078 To perpetuate this, the lie of a extraterrestrial threat is required. Planet of the apes was an attempt to make monkeys the enemy of humanity but this would obviously not work. Therefore, an extra terrestrial species that can pose a real threat to the human species is needed to be fabricated. To make people believe in extra terrestrials, they needed to invent space and other planet in which aliens are from and come to earth to invade. Tot make people believe in space they needed to fake space travel. Space travel is impossible as rockets do not work in low atmosphere. They lied about rocket science stating that the rocket “pushes the exhaust out” (obvious lie as gas moves out of the rocket due to pressure gradient) like standing on a cart and throwing a ball. However, rockets only tend to go up only 70000 feet at most. People wouldn’t see the rocket going straight up and out of sight. It would be obvious that the rocket didn’t enter space. Thus the ball earth lie was promulgated. The rocket would start moving sideways in order to enter “orbit” as it is the most “efficient” way to get to space. The rockets disappeared out of sight moving horizontally (possible) rather than vertically (impossible) as it went to space. The sub standard and dumbed down populace ate it all up and now we are here today. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77773332 United States 07/09/2019 10:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Bart Sibrel's unedited, never before broadcast, interview with, now deceased, original moon landing hoax proponent and former contractor to NASA during the Apollo moon missions, Billy Kaysing. The interview was edited out of Sibrel's "A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon" at the request of Fox Television to make the film fit into a one hour time slot. Mr. Kaysing discusses his first hand account of the incredible atmosphere of engineering ineptitude, on-the-job drunkenness, and endless insurmountable schedule slippages that were rampant in the program, dooming it to failure. "The only way to make it, was to fake it", he said was the underground motto of the staff. Never before in all of recorded aviation has a flying machine worked on its first attempt, much less the most complicated one ever imagined, landing on another heavenly body on its maiden voyage, and returning roundtrip with a crew that lived to tell, all with 1960's technology. (More computing power today is found in a $10 watch). According Kaysing, a classified interdepartmental memo rated the odds of a successful and survivable manned lunar landing on its first attempt at one in ten thousand. That is why the returning men of the mission looked so dejected rather than triumphant at their press conference, as they were blackmailed into lying about the alleged greatest accomplishment of mankind, to the detriment of their own souls. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77800585 Belgium 07/09/2019 10:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You mean do I love my country? Of course. Do I go to country music concerts in a 10-gallon hat, drink Bud Light, and have a "Don't Tread On Me" bumper sticker on my Ford pickup? Fuck no. Are you pride when the US bombs another overseas country? Are American "Great Accomplishments" important to you? do not lump us all together please many americans want no war do not want to be hated. I think MNAY/Most are against abortion and so many other things portrayed as "American" these days. Wish we could turn back time but then it seems so much of yesteryear was a lie just like today I'm not. I have met a lot of nice people from the USA. I needed to ask these questions to get a better picture of him / her. Got my answer when he/she said 9/11 was committed by terrorists... Then it suddenly makes sense that this person will believe the moon landing hoax. Actually, I believe knowing that 9/11 was a lie and the moon landing was faked, should be requirements to enter this site. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 9233880 United States 07/09/2019 10:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77773332 United States 07/09/2019 10:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77524782 Are you pride when the US bombs another overseas country? Are American "Great Accomplishments" important to you? "Great Accomplishments" by America is not on my list of things I care about. And no, I'm no happy when America bombs other countries. Those answers are surprising... What's your opinion on 9/11's official story? I think some terrorists hijacked some planes and crashed them successfully into three buildings. Are you creating a profile here, or what? It was the US Government that DID 9/11 it was our own country oh btw some of it was just simulated on tv. No the building fell (IMPLOSION by set explosives BEFOREHAND not a plane) Wakey wakey |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77800585 Belgium 07/09/2019 10:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77086513 "Great Accomplishments" by America is not on my list of things I care about. And no, I'm no happy when America bombs other countries. Those answers are surprising... What's your opinion on 9/11's official story? I think some terrorists hijacked some planes and crashed them successfully into three buildings. Are you creating a profile here, or what? It was the US Government that DID 9/11 it was our own country oh btw some of it was just simulated on tv. No the building fell (IMPLOSION by set explosives BEFOREHAND not a plane) Wakey wakey I've tried to reason with that person. There is no hope. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77773332 United States 07/09/2019 10:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you believe we landed on the moon in those "vehicles" in 1969, you need to have your head examined. Quoting: Deplorable Doomfan45 i know right, but look at it this way, they are either makin tree fiddy , or there grey mater isnt programmed for rational thought.or they may do some common sense research and may , and i mean MAY figure it out all by themselves, till then just humor them Hey do not give people hell for still believing I think EVERYONE is at some point in discovering what all we have been lied to about, the folks who love their country the most are the ones who want to hold onto what we were brought up believing or told to us by those who we are told to put our trust in at a young age. Perhaps the people who serve in our armed forces have the hardest time. Also each of us learn have our eyes opened at different times. Sometimes I feel more sorry for us who seek out the truth. If they want to wrap themselves in delusion for a short while longer do not be too harsh on "em |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77773332 United States 07/09/2019 10:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77773332 United States 07/09/2019 10:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Can't really blame the Globers for not taking it beyond and thinking for themselves. They simply, can't. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77299565 Like the liberals, socialists, communists, cults, and all brainwashed. They've been indoctrinated to the point they're like zombies. Why do you think they put a globe in each and every first grade classroom? so you are a flat earther? what is the number one video or argument you have to feel that way? I ask because in this upside down world I still cannot think anything is above doubt (sadly) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77773332 United States 07/09/2019 10:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77773332 United States 07/09/2019 10:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77086513 "Great Accomplishments" by America is not on my list of things I care about. And no, I'm no happy when America bombs other countries. Those answers are surprising... What's your opinion on 9/11's official story? I think some terrorists hijacked some planes and crashed them successfully into three buildings. Are you creating a profile here, or what? Yes, now I understand you better. Those questions were a necessity. You're not going to like this...... But you are the majority, you are the yes-nodding, government-trusting sheep who believes anything the media give you to swallow, whether they are naughty Arabic terrorists who couldn't fly a small plane, armed with box cutters and unburnable passports or Christian astronauts who refuse to swear on the Bible that they went on the moon, in a spacecraft that had less technology than my mobile. It's the TRUTH, because you saw it on TV. It's the TV that tells you what to think. Critical thinking is your TV's job. Moreover, you're that type of extreme sheep, who will defend the elite's lie, like a programmed robot. I feel sorry for you and I hope you will cure one day. tell us something some of us may not know yet |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77773332 United States 07/09/2019 10:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I've met and spent a little time with Buzz Aldrin..I highly doubt we didn't go or he's the worlds best actor. Odd guy but I was left with the feeling we did indeed go and he saw things he was unwilling to talk about Quoting: diverdan01 Things he can't talk about... like the truth? I asked him what it was like up there. On the moon..he got sort of an quiet and this intense look in his eye..like he was reliving it..and stared at me and replied.."you wouldn't understand if I told you". I would have understood a lie..he was saying he saw way more than he was willing to talk about IMHO..but hey.this is a conspiracy site so think what you will. No skin in the game for me..just some first hand quality time and convo with the 2nd man to set foot on the moon (in my belief). what you say he said above could also apply to not having gone to the moon you do realize that |