Was the moon landing faked? Poll

I'm being quite serious..it was quite a moment for me and I remember it like it was yesterday. He was an intense guy..he stared off like a million mile stare..then looked at me and said you wouldn't understand. If you don't want to believe it its cool..Glad I experienced it.

After knocking back a couple more double shots, he got sort of quiet and this intense look in his eye...

Yes, I think I get it.

I don't know what the overall shape of this realm is. However, there is no curve. Just a large misunderstanding of perspective and how the human eye creates a horizon. If water curves off like they say it does, You could measure a minute curve in just a fish tank

Feel free to prove me wrong

I don't think anyone doubting the official moon landing story denies that rockets can be built and go up... landing on the moon and coming home in 1969 is another matter entirely. You go up there with them and witness the moon? ooops try again with your short circuited bad logic.

Glad you could discover the truth from his million mile stare... you should offer your services to others for a fee...

Did they disprove the theory that the moon is made of cheese?

Last Edited by MogwaiHunter PM on 07/09/2019 10:46 AM

Is there a moon in hell?

If the pictures shown on TV were not exactly what Buzz saw, then the pictures were faked.

If you don't trust politicians, how can you trust the moon landing and the 9/11 narrative?

Ha, we are on the moon and the moon is really earth. Oops!

The soviets wouldnt squeal because they knew they would end up looking stupid and desperate doing so.

The US propaganda could not be overcome.


But more importantly, the scam showed them the true key weakness of the US, A GULLIBLE POPULATION that they could exploit and overthrow alot cheaper than via direct war.

U are currently living in the midst of the implementation of the plan.

Cognitive Dissonance bruh.

Not all testimony is created equally.

Kaysing later admitted that he fabricated the Hoax Theory because he was pissed at the US government over the Vietnam War.

No amount of unproven claims tops physical evidence anyway.




Only idiots keep claiming that.
If hoaxies weren't idiots (and actually right) they would have no problem proving their accusation.
So far they have never proven anything.
After fifty years still nothing, only an idiot wouldn't be embarressed about that.


Yet you keep failing at actually proving that it is faked.
"Looks fake to me" coming from some ignorant dimwit on the internet isn't evidence.
It's an ignorance based opinion, and those are useless.

Gatekeepers are tards 50 years of psyop propaganda 0 % scientific based reality the Operation mockingbird tv said it's true , the fake news Wikipedia said it's true , the Masonic turtle club astronauts in a bar who. Was gay flirting with me said it's true , the flight surgeons who have phds in nuclear medicine who can't read dosimeters or Geiger counters said it's true ,It goes on and on

I cannot believe that 30% of GLP'ers believe the moon landing was real.

Kaysing later admitted that he fabricated the Hoax Theory because he was pissed at the US government over the Vietnam War.

Because you say he did? Please show us the video of Kaysing saying that or gtfo. Even if he did say that, they probably made him an offer he couldn't refuse. They do take care of their own. Grissom would agree if only he could.

There are a number of thin gs that have not been addressed (here at least) that should cause anyone with reasonable common sense to question the moon landings.

A quick aside, you will notice the Van Allen strawman pushed quite a bit, when there are far more compelling questions.

First of all, the "simulations".

It is entirely reasonable that NASA would simulate moon missions for the benefit of astronauts and public alike, as a precursor and training device for moon missions. What is not reasonable is that they would pretend they had any degree of reality.

If the simulations had been shown as "training simulations", with technicians present advising the astronauts, and no attempt to make the simulations appear real, then we would not be having a debate about fake/real footage all derived from the same source.

Secondly, and more importantly perhaps, is the use of horizons in the moon footage.

Never did any mission ever go to a point of high elevation to photograph a panorama of receding horizon, the horizon is always the top of a hill or crater. Now, if I wentr to the moon I would want to get some great extended landscape photos, not the inside of a crater.

In fact, there are some things really worth looking at on the moon, for example Copernicus crater. Had they parked on the edge of that crater, they could have sent back some truly awe inspiring photos of an ancient strip, with ancient monuments at the base.

Sadly, everything we have seen is only something that will fit into a good sized movie studio, with horizons that can easily be created by backdrop, front screen projection, which would not depict an extended landscape well enough to fool all these well meaning believers who have been so thoroughly fooled to the point of cognitive dissonance when confronted with scientific and circumstantial evidence.

poor deluded soul or else gov shill

bulls slobber or drool not spit, but the rest of your words ring true

There's a book written by Bill Kaysing, a NASA insider during the Apollo mission. It is called We Never Went to the Moon and can be purchased on Amazon.

"We Never Went to the Moon: America's Thirty Billion Dollar Swindle"

[link to www.amazon.com (secure)]

also. . .

"One Small Step? : The Great Moon Hoax and the Race to Dominate Earth from Space"

[link to www.amazon.com (secure)]

Last Edited by G3 on 07/09/2019 01:23 PM

[link to www.vinnysblogbookcom.com (secure)]

[link to archive.org (secure)]

IOW evidence means what ever you want it to mean.
The lack of evidence means what ever you want it to mean.

How is that not irrational?




Braindead insinuations are also a rather poor substitute for proper evidence and sound reasoning.


Fifty years of nothing.
What a preposterous legacy.

:Nelsonhaha49823:

yeah agreed... 70% no less..LOL

Only dipshits think you actually ever say anything. Please, everyone quit refuting this troll’s insults and blather

There's no admission of fraud in that video, just an attribution of interest.

Now, how ab out you address my post on no extended horizons, just a few posts up from your post?

Got it in ya?