| Users Online Now: 2,082 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 771,111 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,268,650 | Threads Today: 501 | Posts Today: 8,718 |
| 12:59 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,082 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 771,111 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,268,650 | Threads Today: 501 | Posts Today: 8,718 |
| 12:59 PM | ||
Meghan Markle doesn't know how to hold her baby Archie | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 76825730  United States07/11/2019 10:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yeah, she looks awkward but some babies are hard to hold. He wasn't crying or screaming so he was probably ok. No doubt, there was a nanny or baby nurse nearby. Quoting: nitebird 76362614 apparently she currently does not have a nanny. Three nannies have aleady quit. Meghan has lost a lot of staff since she married Pr. Harry. The way she is the holding the baby resembles how a newborn would positioned in a wrap styled carrier. If she doesn’t have a nanny- she could likely be using one of those, and this position would be comfortable to both of them. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 72530568  Canada07/11/2019 10:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Funny isn't it - - she already had 2 other kids from previous relationships. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72530568 You NEVER hear of her other kids - they have disappeared. And with being a mom previously this should be 'old hat' to her by now. The entire wedding/relationship/baby thing is a False Flag waiting to happen. It's all a sham. She has two other children? Yes. This was commonly known prior to and just as she was entering her fake relationship with Prince Harry. But like Obama's foreign born status - the internets have been scrubbed of this. There are many on GLP who know this to be fact. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77681764 United States07/11/2019 10:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77790784 United States07/11/2019 10:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Jingobilova  User ID: 77134407 Canada07/11/2019 10:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Jingobilova User ID: 77134407 Canada07/11/2019 10:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77283375 United States07/11/2019 10:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 46615978 United States07/11/2019 10:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 77685125  Austria07/11/2019 10:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I know nothing about kids...especially babies....but my initial reaction to seeing those pics is that it is NOT her child. There appears to be no intimate connection between that thing and the baby. She's holding it like a sack of potatoes and it is waaaay too large to be 2 months old. I mean, if that kid is 2 month old, then it is on steroids. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 44883436 What a freaking dog & pony show. And people just eat it up. Unreal.  nowadays royals dont make their own babies.They were given babies to show us as their own ones.All those babies are geneticaly modified and created in labs with super sperms from healthy humans |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 75114296  Australia07/11/2019 10:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| ROSICRUCIAN1 User ID: 77804393 Canada07/11/2019 10:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This baby is going to look quite White, because it will be at least 88% White. Markle is 75% White, her husband 100% White. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77405944 Markle is as a result of a White man banging up a Black female.....not a good example to set. not certain about that.. isn't her mother like 100% blak? certainly her mom wasn't 50/50 which she would need to be for Meghan to be 75% or more. |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 77685125 Austria07/11/2019 10:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 51994186 United States07/11/2019 10:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 75554920 United States07/11/2019 10:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Meghan is clearly not related to that baby and she has obviously never held it before. She must be demanding her servants take care of the baby she didn't carry and feels nothing for. That is why so many nannies have quit. That baby is all white. And why does she have a huge baby bump wearing that awning when she didn't have it at Wimbledon? So odd and suspicious. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 51994186 United States07/11/2019 10:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 77685125 Austria07/11/2019 11:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Royals were worried that she could give them black baby.No way they let her to make a baby Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77685125 Hey fuck head, shut the fuck up you IGNORAMOUS YOUR English is fucking PATHETIC CRAWL back into your evil basement hole of a life. What a shame YOU weren't ABORTED English does not matter.Are you a royal ass licker? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 75554920 United States07/11/2019 11:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77631946 United States07/11/2019 11:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| ROSICRUCIAN1 User ID: 77804393 Canada07/11/2019 11:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77225670 United States07/11/2019 11:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| BloodyMary User ID: 77792490  United Kingdom07/11/2019 11:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So, what's the conspiracy? Quoting: Wookiee666 She's really a lizard-person? She's really a he and hes don't know how to carry babies. The baby was swapped out for an older one and she wasn't able to adjust for the weight change? He’s got a big fat white baby I don't believe it's her/his/its baby at all! The fat little baby is white.....she/he/it....is black! That's why the photo looks awkward there is no woman who gave birth there and the poor baby is hanging in the arms of a strange freak! They fuck you up, your mum and dad. They may not mean to, but they do. They fill you with the faults they had And add some extra, just for you. But they were fucked up in their turn By fools in old-style hats and coats, Who half the time were soppy-stern And half at one another’s throats. Man hands on misery to man. It deepens like a coastal shelf. Get out as early as you can, And don’t have any kids yourself. Philip Larkin. |
| ElleMira User ID: 76494359 United States07/11/2019 11:19 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So, what's the conspiracy? Quoting: Wookiee666 She's really a lizard-person? She's really a he and hes don't know how to carry babies. The baby was swapped out for an older one and she wasn't able to adjust for the weight change? Rumor has it, she used to be a "yacht girl" - like so many young, attractive actresses and models. Similar to "Weinstein girls" and Diana Jenkins Room 23 lookbook, and this: [link to www.crazydaysandnights.net (secure)] [link to dianajenkins.com (secure)] It's an interesting CT that she was probably purposefully groomed and set up to meet Harry and infiltrate the monarchy. She obviously doesn't look like she has any experience holding babies - she probably can't wait to get home and had him back over to the nanny. Last Edited by ElleMira on 07/11/2019 11:21 AM |
| Too Dark Park™ Two User ID: 76683902 United States07/11/2019 11:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Of course she doesn't know how to cradle her (FAKE) baby! She has an army of nanny's that do it for her! Bless my fuck "It’s in my interest, in ours perhaps, or maybe the interests of the greater good, for me to smoke a joint, and calm down.” — Hunter S. Thompson "I've got the spirit, but lose the feeling!" :rockon: |
| astratt5757 User ID: 4989581 United States07/11/2019 11:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77651564 Australia07/11/2019 11:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | She doesn't know how to carry her own baby': Meghan Markle is mom-shamed on Instagram by critics claiming she looks like she is about to DROP newborn Archie in photos from their first public outing Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77685125 Meghan, 37, was photographed cradling her newborn son Archie Mountbatten-Windsor at Billingbear Polo Club in Wokingham, Surrey, on Wednesday The Duchess of Sussex and her baby boy joined Kate Middleton and her three children to watch Prince William and Prince Harry at a charity polo match After photos of the two moms were published online, people flocked to Instagram to slam the way Meghan was holding Archie [link to www.dailymail.co.uk (secure)] That kid is way too pink/white for it to be Markles. Definately was a surrogate. Obvioulsy an Anglo one. |
| Serepta Ann User ID: 49418768 United States07/11/2019 11:32 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You have to train your mind to be stronger than your emotions or you will lose yourself every time |
| amicrazy78 User ID: 74921282 United States07/11/2019 11:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Polkahonkus User ID: 7941847 United States07/11/2019 11:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So, what's the conspiracy? Quoting: Wookiee666 She's really a lizard-person? She's really a he and hes don't know how to carry babies. The baby was swapped out for an older one and she wasn't able to adjust for the weight change? You aren’t doing class envy right. The woman doesn’t have a scrawny WIC nourished baby and she doesn’t have a lot of practice holding her baby in public—she has help. Your supposed to call her a bad mother. It soothes your anxiety that rich babies are sometimes tha double the weight of poor babies at birth. |
| Pees and Ques User ID: 75014387 United States07/11/2019 11:47 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Funny isn't it - - she already had 2 other kids from previous relationships. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72530568 You NEVER hear of her other kids - they have disappeared. And with being a mom previously this should be 'old hat' to her by now. The entire wedding/relationship/baby thing is a False Flag waiting to happen. It's all a sham. I can't find any reference to her having other children. She did not have children in her previous marriage that marriage was in 2011. They start dating in 2004. Any other children would have to be 15+ years old. Do you have a link? |
| Serepta Ann User ID: 49418768 United States07/11/2019 11:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Funny isn't it - - she already had 2 other kids from previous relationships. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72530568 You NEVER hear of her other kids - they have disappeared. And with being a mom previously this should be 'old hat' to her by now. The entire wedding/relationship/baby thing is a False Flag waiting to happen. It's all a sham. I can't find any reference to her having other children. She did not have children in her previous marriage that marriage was in 2011. They start dating in 2004. Any other children would have to be 15+ years old. Do you have a link? It's all about Samantha's daughter Noelle, some say she is Meghan's daughter, not her own Last Edited by Serepta Ann on 07/11/2019 11:55 AM You have to train your mind to be stronger than your emotions or you will lose yourself every time |
