Meghan Markle doesn't know how to hold her baby Archie | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77199578 United Kingdom 07/11/2019 12:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72430464 United States 07/11/2019 12:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72999675 United States 07/11/2019 12:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think that it was darren, not archie. (What parent, royal or no, names a kid "archie"? Sick joke. Especially since it's the nickname/security name? of prince george, wills's firstborn). What an odd set of pics. Did that baby even move? Make a sound? For three hours? And didn't need to be fed or had a diaper change? Where was the carriage or papoose board? Where was the sun hat? Why draped in a blanket? Again, the dangling feet, just like in the pic with diana's fav. flower, the forget-me-not. Harry looked pissed off, not like a fond husband and father. This was an IVP/surrogate pregnancy; not "of the body." No doctor signed off; the godparents are secret. Connecting the dots, I'd say the royals agreed to this marriage, etc., for the sake of harry wanting a child, especially one that could be presented to the commonwealth as a mixed-race child. However, me-gain is a very unpleasant human being who has been programmed? to infiltrate and attack the brf and by extension the english themselves. The right baby hasn't shown up yet, perhaps, which is why harry said that babies change a lot. No, harry, not that much. Now the brf are in the thick of the scam. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73944184 Hungary 07/11/2019 12:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think that it was darren, not archie. (What parent, royal or no, names a kid "archie"? Sick joke. Especially since it's the nickname/security name? of prince george, wills's firstborn). Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72999675 What an odd set of pics. Did that baby even move? Make a sound? For three hours? And didn't need to be fed or had a diaper change? Where was the carriage or papoose board? Where was the sun hat? Why draped in a blanket? Again, the dangling feet, just like in the pic with diana's fav. flower, the forget-me-not. Harry looked pissed off, not like a fond husband and father. This was an IVP/surrogate pregnancy; not "of the body." No doctor signed off; the godparents are secret. Connecting the dots, I'd say the royals agreed to this marriage, etc., for the sake of harry wanting a child, especially one that could be presented to the commonwealth as a mixed-race child. However, me-gain is a very unpleasant human being who has been programmed? to infiltrate and attack the brf and by extension the english themselves. The right baby hasn't shown up yet, perhaps, which is why harry said that babies change a lot. No, harry, not that much. Now the brf are in the thick of the scam. Archie Harrison Bounel Windsor. |
White Gloves User ID: 77026737 United States 07/11/2019 01:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This baby is going to look quite White, because it will be at least 88% White. Markle is 75% White, her husband 100% White. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77405944 Markle is as a result of a White man banging up a Black female.....not a good example to set. How do you compute markle at 75% white when her Dad is white and her mother totally black? That makes her a 'half-breed', meaning 50% black and 50% white. But, for the first time, I am suspecting something IS wrong with this situation because that child is NOT a recent born. He is way too big. More BS from the elites. Slop it up slaves. . |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 55303780 United States 07/11/2019 01:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77777635 Canada 07/11/2019 01:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
anonymous User ID: 77745296 United States 07/11/2019 01:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77310877 United States 07/11/2019 01:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77512264 United States 07/11/2019 01:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76562670 United States 07/11/2019 01:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And why is she wearing the fake baby bump still?? That's so odd. Nothing is right with her. She would have lost her baby weight by now even if she really DID have a baby! She never even wore lose dresses when she was pregnant. Why now? Is she really pregnant now and the baby is a loaner? I wish we knew but sadly we will never know. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75839896 United States 07/11/2019 02:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75839896 United States 07/11/2019 02:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Deplorable Mary User ID: 73231618 United States 07/11/2019 02:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No way that's a 2 month old baby. He looks 4 months at least. I think this was an attempt at damage control from her Wimbledon shenanigans. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 70309345 Wimbledon shenanigans? Tell me more please! She booked 40+ seats for herself and a couple of fat white chicks to see Serena Williams play. A couple of people were taking pictures of the match and some selfies. Meg's security approached the people and told them to stop taking pictures of her as she was there in private. The 2 people were NOT taking pictures of her an in fact didn't even realise she was even there. Supposedly the security dude was embarrassed afterwards. Also she could not sit in the royal seating area because jeans are not allowed. |
Cryptnotic User ID: 77801145 United States 07/11/2019 02:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Funny isn't it - - she already had 2 other kids from previous relationships. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72530568 You NEVER hear of her other kids - they have disappeared. And with being a mom previously this should be 'old hat' to her by now. The entire wedding/relationship/baby thing is a False Flag waiting to happen. It's all a sham. I can't find any reference to her having other children. She did not have children in her previous marriage that marriage was in 2011. They start dating in 2004. Any other children would have to be 15+ years old. Do you have a link? It's all about Samantha's daughter Noelle, some say she is Meghan's daughter, not her own Just for the sake of consistency, you all have to decide if she was a man - who can't carry children - or a woman who is pretending to never have had children. So which is it? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76993955 United States 07/11/2019 02:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This baby is going to look quite White, because it will be at least 88% White. Markle is 75% White, her husband 100% White. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77405944 Markle is as a result of a White man banging up a Black female.....not a good example to set. How do you compute markle at 75% white when her Dad is white and her mother totally black? That makes her a 'half-breed', meaning 50% black and 50% white. But, for the first time, I am suspecting something IS wrong with this situation because that child is NOT a recent born. He is way too big. More BS from the elites. Slop it up slaves. . Because African-Americans are already around 25% White, due to White slave owners screwing Black female slaves for 400 years. And Markles mother is a lighter looking African-American women, meaning she has even more White genes. |
Deplorable Mary User ID: 73231618 United States 07/11/2019 02:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76908609 United States 07/11/2019 02:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This baby is going to look quite White, because it will be at least 88% White. Markle is 75% White, her husband 100% White. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77405944 Markle is as a result of a White man banging up a Black female.....not a good example to set. How do you compute markle at 75% white when her Dad is white and her mother totally black? That makes her a 'half-breed', meaning 50% black and 50% white. But, for the first time, I am suspecting something IS wrong with this situation because that child is NOT a recent born. He is way too big. More BS from the elites. Slop it up slaves. . Because African-Americans are already around 25% White, due to White slave owners screwing Black female slaves for 400 years. And Markles mother is a lighter looking African-American women, meaning she has even more White genes. [link to vignette.wikia.nocookie.net (secure)] Doria's family look like black Africans you could find in Africa. There's probably very little white if any. Archie is not related to Meghan. That seems apparent. |
Polkahonkus User ID: 7941847 United States 07/11/2019 02:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think that it was darren, not archie. (What parent, royal or no, names a kid "archie"? Sick joke. Especially since it's the nickname/security name? of prince george, wills's firstborn). Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72999675 What an odd set of pics. Did that baby even move? Make a sound? For three hours? And didn't need to be fed or had a diaper change? Where was the carriage or papoose board? Where was the sun hat? Why draped in a blanket? Again, the dangling feet, just like in the pic with diana's fav. flower, the forget-me-not. Harry looked pissed off, not like a fond husband and father. This was an IVP/surrogate pregnancy; not "of the body." No doctor signed off; the godparents are secret. Connecting the dots, I'd say the royals agreed to this marriage, etc., for the sake of harry wanting a child, especially one that could be presented to the commonwealth as a mixed-race child. However, me-gain is a very unpleasant human being who has been programmed? to infiltrate and attack the brf and by extension the english themselves. The right baby hasn't shown up yet, perhaps, which is why harry said that babies change a lot. No, harry, not that much. Now the brf are in the thick of the scam. You think they use a body double baby outings? I would. Especially if I had no mother in law like that |
Deplorable Mary User ID: 73231618 United States 07/11/2019 02:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | She looks like she's pregnant again and trying to hold her belly up with the baby so the fake belly doesn't pop out. ;p Quoting: Diabolical. Just what I was thinking! lol And what's up with that outfit she's wearing?! Definitely not fashion-forward imo. What bloody nightmare all the way 'round! Good lord, she does look pregnant again, except even if she were, no way she'd be that pregnant. And definitely not something she would wear. In fact as snooty as she is, I can't imagine her wearing something like that to work in the garden, not that she'd get dirty or anything... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76809166 United States 07/11/2019 03:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I know nothing about kids...especially babies....but my initial reaction to seeing those pics is that it is NOT her child. There appears to be no intimate connection between that thing and the baby. She's holding it like a sack of potatoes and it is waaaay too large to be 2 months old. I mean, if that kid is 2 month old, then it is on steroids. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 44883436 What a freaking dog & pony show. And people just eat it up. Unreal. Yeah, if it's your kid, the holding part comes instinctively. Definitely doesn't seem like hers. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76908609 United States 07/11/2019 03:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74827762 United States 07/11/2019 03:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73240859 United States 07/11/2019 03:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I know nothing about kids...especially babies....but my initial reaction to seeing those pics is that it is NOT her child. There appears to be no intimate connection between that thing and the baby. She's holding it like a sack of potatoes and it is waaaay too large to be 2 months old. I mean, if that kid is 2 month old, then it is on steroids. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 44883436 What a freaking dog & pony show. And people just eat it up. Unreal. Dude my friends baby was just born at 11 pounds and is massive When it's 2 it's easily gonna be that big |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 9983835 United States 07/11/2019 03:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76908609 United States 07/11/2019 03:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76908609 United States 07/11/2019 03:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
alwaysme User ID: 40728818 United States 07/11/2019 03:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | . Haha, I thought maybe you guys were just being dramatic... but she clearly does not look comfortable holding that baby. It's really awkward looking. You know what else is weird... Kate's youngest child (Louis, is it?) looks EXACTLY like the older child (George)!!! I mean, they're identical! They really look like clones or some kind laboratory created twins. How weird is that! . |
anonymousJoker User ID: 75783843 United States 07/11/2019 03:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 77685125 Austria 07/11/2019 03:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |