I think that it was darren, not archie. (What parent, royal or no, names a kid "archie"? Sick joke. Especially since it's the nickname/security name? of prince george, wills's firstborn).

What an odd set of pics.

Did that baby even move? Make a sound? For three hours?

And didn't need to be fed or had a diaper change?

Where was the carriage or papoose board?

Where was the sun hat? Why draped in a blanket?

Again, the dangling feet, just like in the pic with diana's fav. flower, the forget-me-not.

Harry looked pissed off, not like a fond husband and father.

This was an IVP/surrogate pregnancy; not "of the body."
No doctor signed off; the godparents are secret.

Connecting the dots, I'd say the royals agreed to this marriage, etc., for the sake of harry wanting a child, especially one that could be presented to the commonwealth as a mixed-race child.

However, me-gain is a very unpleasant human being who has been programmed? to infiltrate and attack the brf and by extension the english themselves.

The right baby hasn't shown up yet, perhaps, which is why harry said that babies change a lot.

No, harry, not that much.

Now the brf are in the thick of the scam.