A person answered: why are people so hostile towards President Donald Trump? | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73364948 United States 07/11/2019 10:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 72791376 United States 07/11/2019 10:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well I don't have the time to address all the points BUT I'll just ask if the list doesn't apply to Hillary? or is she above all on that list? should we hate her more or less than the hatred for Trump? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73364948 It's not a Trump vs. Hillary thing. Would I rather us have a republican candidate who is more qualified? Yes. Absolutely. But, I understand why people did not like or vote Hillary either. I do, however, think that Trump was unfair and took some shots against Hillary that he shouldn't have. Emails? The Trump administration is violating that very thing, and using personal iPhones for sensitive business communication. It's well-documented. Benghazi...she showed up to the congressional hearing and answered questions for hours in spite of that. She didn't try to subvert justice and just not show up like Barr did, for example. I'm not trying to say choose sides here. Just saying...there has to be someone better. And I would much rather have had a republican who is more qualified. A more Reagan-like person, for example. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74846433 United States 07/11/2019 10:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well I don't have the time to address all the points BUT I'll just ask if the list doesn't apply to Hillary? or is she above all on that list? should we hate her more or less than the hatred for Trump? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73364948 It's not a Trump vs. Hillary thing. Would I rather us have a republican candidate who is more qualified? Yes. Absolutely. But, I understand why people did not like or vote Hillary either. I do, however, think that Trump was unfair and took some shots against Hillary that he shouldn't have. Emails? The Trump administration is violating that very thing, and using personal iPhones for sensitive business communication. It's well-documented. Benghazi...she showed up to the congressional hearing and answered questions for hours in spite of that. She didn't try to subvert justice and just not show up like Barr did, for example. I'm not trying to say choose sides here. Just saying...there has to be someone better. And I would much rather have had a republican who is more qualified. A more Reagan-like person, for example. I would look at Andrew Yang, he is without a doubt the best candidate running. Tulsi Gabbard is second. Yang / Gabbard would be good. Both have signed the 'End the Forever Wars' pledge. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 10724289 United States 07/11/2019 10:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nope, none of that. Breaks down into two camps in end times. Globalists or nationalists. One wants unelected officials ruling over you from afar. The other wants local representation for the government. Why flood the nation with socialists from the south? They will vote out native nationalists like they did in California. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 54049328 United States 07/11/2019 10:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well I don't have the time to address all the points BUT I'll just ask if the list doesn't apply to Hillary? or is she above all on that list? should we hate her more or less than the hatred for Trump? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73364948 It's not a Trump vs. Hillary thing. Would I rather us have a republican candidate who is more qualified? Yes. Absolutely. But, I understand why people did not like or vote Hillary either. I do, however, think that Trump was unfair and took some shots against Hillary that he shouldn't have. Emails? The Trump administration is violating that very thing, and using personal iPhones for sensitive business communication. It's well-documented. Benghazi...she showed up to the congressional hearing and answered questions for hours in spite of that. She didn't try to subvert justice and just not show up like Barr did, for example. I'm not trying to say choose sides here. Just saying...there has to be someone better. And I would much rather have had a republican who is more qualified. A more Reagan-like person, for example. Oh yes it was a Trump vs Hillary thing. And its gonna be a Trump vs sumbuddy else thing again apparently, so: Who ya got? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 54049328 United States 07/11/2019 10:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nope, none of that. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 10724289 Breaks down into two camps in end times. Globalists or nationalists. One wants unelected officials ruling over you from afar. The other wants local representation for the government. Why flood the nation with socialists from the south? They will vote out native nationalists like they did in California. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 54049328 United States 07/11/2019 10:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well I don't have the time to address all the points BUT I'll just ask if the list doesn't apply to Hillary? or is she above all on that list? should we hate her more or less than the hatred for Trump? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73364948 It's not a Trump vs. Hillary thing. Would I rather us have a republican candidate who is more qualified? Yes. Absolutely. But, I understand why people did not like or vote Hillary either. I do, however, think that Trump was unfair and took some shots against Hillary that he shouldn't have. Emails? The Trump administration is violating that very thing, and using personal iPhones for sensitive business communication. It's well-documented. Benghazi...she showed up to the congressional hearing and answered questions for hours in spite of that. She didn't try to subvert justice and just not show up like Barr did, for example. I'm not trying to say choose sides here. Just saying...there has to be someone better. And I would much rather have had a republican who is more qualified. A more Reagan-like person, for example. I would look at Andrew Yang, he is without a doubt the best candidate running. Tulsi Gabbard is second. Yang / Gabbard would be good. Both have signed the 'End the Forever Wars' pledge. Neither one will defend the Bill of Rights and US Constitution. Death to Tyrants. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73364948 United States 07/11/2019 10:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well I don't have the time to address all the points BUT I'll just ask if the list doesn't apply to Hillary? or is she above all on that list? should we hate her more or less than the hatred for Trump? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73364948 It's not a Trump vs. Hillary thing. Would I rather us have a republican candidate who is more qualified? Yes. Absolutely. But, I understand why people did not like or vote Hillary either. I do, however, think that Trump was unfair and took some shots against Hillary that he shouldn't have. Emails? The Trump administration is violating that very thing, and using personal iPhones for sensitive business communication. It's well-documented. Benghazi...she showed up to the congressional hearing and answered questions for hours in spite of that. She didn't try to subvert justice and just not show up like Barr did, for example. I'm not trying to say choose sides here. Just saying...there has to be someone better. And I would much rather have had a republican who is more qualified. A more Reagan-like person, for example. I would have loved a Reaganesque candidate HOWEVER Trump and Hillary were the choices....I voted for the one that best represented my beliefs.....had hillary won, I wouldn't have liked it BUT I would have HDS either....I'm a Libertarian btw.... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75815744 United States 07/11/2019 10:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well I don't have the time to address all the points BUT I'll just ask if the list doesn't apply to Hillary? or is she above all on that list? should we hate her more or less than the hatred for Trump? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73364948 It's not a Trump vs. Hillary thing. Would I rather us have a republican candidate who is more qualified? Yes. Absolutely. But, I understand why people did not like or vote Hillary either. I do, however, think that Trump was unfair and took some shots against Hillary that he shouldn't have. Emails? The Trump administration is violating that very thing, and using personal iPhones for sensitive business communication. It's well-documented. Benghazi...she showed up to the congressional hearing and answered questions for hours in spite of that. She didn't try to subvert justice and just not show up like Barr did, for example. I'm not trying to say choose sides here. Just saying...there has to be someone better. And I would much rather have had a republican who is more qualified. A more Reagan-like person, for example. I would look at Andrew Yang, he is without a doubt the best candidate running. Tulsi Gabbard is second. Yang / Gabbard would be good. Both have signed the 'End the Forever Wars' pledge. Neither one will defend the Bill of Rights and US Constitution. Death to Tyrants. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77630778 United States 07/11/2019 10:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77026737 United States 07/11/2019 10:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well I don't have the time to address all the points BUT I'll just ask if the list doesn't apply to Hillary? or is she above all on that list? should we hate her more or less than the hatred for Trump? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73364948 It's not a Trump vs. Hillary thing. Would I rather us have a republican candidate who is more qualified? Yes. Absolutely. But, I understand why people did not like or vote Hillary either. I do, however, think that Trump was unfair and took some shots against Hillary that he shouldn't have. Emails? The Trump administration is violating that very thing, and using personal iPhones for sensitive business communication. It's well-documented. Benghazi...she showed up to the congressional hearing and answered questions for hours in spite of that. She didn't try to subvert justice and just not show up like Barr did, for example. I'm not trying to say choose sides here. Just saying...there has to be someone better. And I would much rather have had a republican who is more qualified. A more Reagan-like person, for example. BS. You are a fraud pretending to be a GLPer. But off you sucky lib. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77026737 United States 07/11/2019 10:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well I don't have the time to address all the points BUT I'll just ask if the list doesn't apply to Hillary? or is she above all on that list? should we hate her more or less than the hatred for Trump? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73364948 It's not a Trump vs. Hillary thing. Would I rather us have a republican candidate who is more qualified? Yes. Absolutely. But, I understand why people did not like or vote Hillary either. I do, however, think that Trump was unfair and took some shots against Hillary that he shouldn't have. Emails? The Trump administration is violating that very thing, and using personal iPhones for sensitive business communication. It's well-documented. Benghazi...she showed up to the congressional hearing and answered questions for hours in spite of that. She didn't try to subvert justice and just not show up like Barr did, for example. I'm not trying to say choose sides here. Just saying...there has to be someone better. And I would much rather have had a republican who is more qualified. A more Reagan-like person, for example. I would look at Andrew Yang, he is without a doubt the best candidate running. Tulsi Gabbard is second. Yang / Gabbard would be good. Both have signed the 'End the Forever Wars' pledge. All the commies are here pretending to be centrists and libertarian. Bunch of mind control bots. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 70805470 United States 07/11/2019 10:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76825730 United States 07/11/2019 10:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I know exactly who I voted for. I’m sorry if that hurts peoples “feelings.” More qualified? Another politician? No thanks. I’ll take an “unqualified” businessman over an experienced politician any day. This country needed a wake up call. We absolutely got it. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77134005 United States 07/11/2019 11:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72237258 United States 07/11/2019 11:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77743250 United States 07/11/2019 11:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72237258 United States 07/11/2019 11:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77447156 United States 07/11/2019 11:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68793616 Canada 07/11/2019 11:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I've read your list and here's THE truth. Almost all your points are completely SUBJECTIVE. You hate the guy so anything he does that you disagree with is a severe character flaw bordering on severe psychosis, racism, misogyny, homophobia, treason etc etc. NOT even one of your points can be backed with actual FACTS or is any way grounded in anything but the fact he's a normal multi -billionaire who responds as most people would given the typical leftist / marxist animus articles and OPINIONS such as your well written load of complete BULLSHIT being thrown at him daily. Not saying he's perfect but to describe or label your rant as THE unfortunate TRUTH is just another reeeking pile pf fly-bait in the middle of a pasture!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22373790 United States 07/11/2019 11:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
MR.GGG User ID: 68793616 Canada 07/11/2019 11:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I signed i. Don't know why when I posted it forgot me ... *********** OP -"" I'm just here for the truth. And here it is."" I've read your list and here's THE truth. Almost all your points are completely SUBJECTIVE. You hate the guy so anything he does that you disagree with is a severe character flaw bordering on severe psychosis, racism, misogyny, homophobia, treason etc etc. NOT even one of your points can be backed with actual FACTS or is any way grounded in anything but the fact he's a normal multi -billionaire who responds as most people would given the typical leftist / marxist animus articles and OPINIONS such as your well written load of complete BULLSHIT being thrown at him daily. Not saying he's perfect but to describe or label your rant as THE unfortunate TRUTH is just another reeeking pile pf fly-bait in the middle of a pasture!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77134005 United States 07/11/2019 11:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77732153 United States 07/11/2019 11:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well I don't have the time to address all the points BUT I'll just ask if the list doesn't apply to Hillary? or is she above all on that list? should we hate her more or less than the hatred for Trump? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73364948 It's not a Trump vs. Hillary thing. Would I rather us have a republican candidate who is more qualified? Yes. Absolutely. But, I understand why people did not like or vote Hillary either. I do, however, think that Trump was unfair and took some shots against Hillary that he shouldn't have. Emails? The Trump administration is violating that very thing, and using personal iPhones for sensitive business communication. It's well-documented. Benghazi...she showed up to the congressional hearing and answered questions for hours in spite of that. She didn't try to subvert justice and just not show up like Barr did, for example. I'm not trying to say choose sides here. Just saying...there has to be someone better. And I would much rather have had a republican who is more qualified. A more Reagan-like person, for example. I would look at Andrew Yang, he is without a doubt the best candidate running. Tulsi Gabbard is second. Yang / Gabbard would be good. Yang/Gabbard would be a disaster for the US. Any of the democrats would. OP: Trump isn’t perfect and he is a bit rough around the edges, but he is exactly the wrecking ball America needed. His court appointees alone have helped slow the 40 year slide into communism. While you may not like his America-first approach the fact is he is getting results, and we have been giving the country away for generations. Stop clutching your pearls on the feinting sofa and get on board. The left is hell-bent to destroy this country and they will accomplish it while people like you stand by and do nothing. By the way: “He lies. A lot.” Really? I mean really??!? Compared to the democrats and their accomplices in the propogandist media he is a paragon of truth. Good grief. Wake up. |
The Semi Shut In User ID: 77809244 United States 07/11/2019 11:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I knew a guy who worked on a trump hotel. His boss told the work crew to put up regular wallboard in tub/showers instead of greenboard. So Trump comes to inspect and sees the chiseling and fires the contractor and refuses to pay as all the rooms that were done had to be redone. I would imagine that was why many contractors were not paid. Last Edited by The Semi Shut In on 07/11/2019 11:36 PM Sometimes I'm in the world but not of it and Sometimes I'm of the world but not in it. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77804873 United States 07/11/2019 11:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well I don't have the time to address all the points BUT I'll just ask if the list doesn't apply to Hillary? or is she above all on that list? should we hate her more or less than the hatred for Trump? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73364948 It's not a Trump vs. Hillary thing. Would I rather us have a republican candidate who is more qualified? Yes. Absolutely. But, I understand why people did not like or vote Hillary either. I do, however, think that Trump was unfair and took some shots against Hillary that he shouldn't have. Emails? The Trump administration is violating that very thing, and using personal iPhones for sensitive business communication. It's well-documented. Benghazi...she showed up to the congressional hearing and answered questions for hours in spite of that. She didn't try to subvert justice and just not show up like Barr did, for example. I'm not trying to say choose sides here. Just saying...there has to be someone better. And I would much rather have had a republican who is more qualified. A more Reagan-like person, for example. Horse shit. Hillary was engaged in pay to play espionage on her private server. You are either too dumb to research or more likely just another self assured, brain dead cock sucker. Fuck you and your thread, biotch. If people like you died of cancer in mass, the world would be a better place. You are the enemy. THE 7 PIECES OF INFO THE DEEP STATE DOES NOT WANT YOU TO KNOW & JEFFREY EPSTEIN |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77804873 United States 07/11/2019 11:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well I don't have the time to address all the points BUT I'll just ask if the list doesn't apply to Hillary? or is she above all on that list? should we hate her more or less than the hatred for Trump? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73364948 It's not a Trump vs. Hillary thing. Would I rather us have a republican candidate who is more qualified? Yes. Absolutely. But, I understand why people did not like or vote Hillary either. I do, however, think that Trump was unfair and took some shots against Hillary that he shouldn't have. Emails? The Trump administration is violating that very thing, and using personal iPhones for sensitive business communication. It's well-documented. Benghazi...she showed up to the congressional hearing and answered questions for hours in spite of that. She didn't try to subvert justice and just not show up like Barr did, for example. I'm not trying to say choose sides here. Just saying...there has to be someone better. And I would much rather have had a republican who is more qualified. A more Reagan-like person, for example. I would look at Andrew Yang, he is without a doubt the best candidate running. Tulsi Gabbard is second. Yang / Gabbard would be good. Both have signed the 'End the Forever Wars' pledge. Horse shit. You delusional fucks still think this country has 4, 8 or 20 years to fuck around on the way to a communist shit hole. Laughing at you, morons. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74661623 United States 07/11/2019 11:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77804873 United States 07/11/2019 11:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 40188677 United States 07/11/2019 11:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |