I'm sure many people here researched the hell out of 9/11, right?

1993 1st WTC bombing, bling sheik.
2001 2nd WTC bombing after hudna.

Understand dar ul Islam.
Conspiracy theories came out of Egypt as part of a bigger plot that has brought us to today to gain sympathy for Islam.

Be prepared for bigger attacks soon.

The only thing bigger than 911 would be chemical then nuclear.

Scary thought.

Recruitment campaign carried out by the u.s military (military industrial complex) on u.s citizens.

Pods on the FIRST plane? No. You’re thinking of the second plane — allegedly United #175, the 767 that hit the South Tower.

There WAS video of the first plane hitting the North Tower. It was taken by the “Frenchman” Jules Naudet. The KOSHER videographer. Being born in France does not a Frenchman make.

Jules and Gideon Naudet. Guess what day of the week they worship on?

Wow. Just...wow.

It all makes sense. Reality is scripted.

God makes jokes too.

Last Edited by niphtrique on 07/21/2019 03:03 PM

BBC predicted collapse of building 7 more than 30 minutes in advance.

Knowing it’s an inside job, yet you probably still like republicans and hate illhan because she said some people. Yeah some people did it. Muslims that were not.

You know this, yet support Israel and hate the Muslims: why? Because they are brown?

EVERY major node in the story is virtually impossible.
They want to line up a hundred nodes, each virtually impossible then claim that thats how it happened, one impossibility after the other.

Physics and chemistry isnt plastic and moldable, it is rigid and cannot change from day to day.
You cannot heat a physical mass to 2000 degrees with an 800 degree heat source, even if you ignore radiant and conductive heat losses.

Dont speak for me, for you'd be wrong in your premises.

And so did FOX and CBS.

But they didnt PREDICT it,
They EACH said it had already happened, with the erect building 7 still standing in the background, no less..

And the thing is that certain cabal of people claiming to be experts in their field, LIED about what happened and INTENTIONALLY misled a generally ignorant public.

The facts are obvious.
They were just obscured and heavily lied about by people that know better.

Just like the lie that CO2 is an insulating gas, when it is no more significantly insulating than any other gas.

dumbass. Because they're mooslimbs. Iranians aren't brown, but they get included BECAUSE they're mooslimbs.

See for yourself who lies and who benefits and if the ones who make war by deceiving everyone else about them in the past, present and future are not accociated with this event then they would be blameless.

BUT if they are....

The real question remains how 3 independent could announce almost simultaneously on TV that the bld 7 had collapsed and do it WITH THE goddam BUILDING 7 still standing behind them?

Yes quite a bit.


I'll wager I know more about the engineering and architecture of building 7 than 100% of the "freefall speeders".

Those pods are only found on military aircraft.

The pods can launch missiles, provide targeting systems AND THE ABILITY TO REMOTELY FLY THE PLANE!

Go figure.

That would make two of us, not to mention procurement, aircraft, chemistry, physics and demolit6ion.

I WONDER HOO has the patents or applications experience in multiengine drone tech.
And would they have any association with the ultimately benefitting party, or, country?
The rabi hole goes deep indeed.

I'd say about 80% of the people i talk to don't know how many buildings fell into their own footprints.

they all think it's 2.

Yes, I remember the pics and discussions.
That's SOP, in order to keep the charade going they have to remove all evidence to the contrary.

and the pentagon - no plane.

I know, thats the first thing I ask to check for signs of intelligent life.

Do you remember that time at the other place where truthers were insisting there is no such thing as monocoat and that I was crazy saying that hi-rise buildings have sprayed on firecoating (I have years in commercial construction), then I realized I was spelling it wrong and it's called monokote, oh boy you never saw a bunch of internet nerds backpedal and disappear so fast. Those were fun times, quite the hoot.

Sadly, the misdirection that capitalizes on the ignorance of basic physics shown by "truthers", even those with PhD's has been remarkably effective at preventing them from asking the real questions about 911.

I am against anyone that wants to "Fundamentally Change" our great Country! Race is irrelevant

Hole for the fuselage but no holes for the 2 ton engine turbine shafts which would be gyroscopically stabilized and leave their own holes on either side,

When in fact it was only building 7, the debris radius of all the others is clear.

this is what i also think. building 7 is the easiest part of 911 to show how the whole thing was a false flag.

then, from there, you can look into the drills running on that day... and then everything else falls into place. if it wasn't for building 7 not getting hit by a plane, larry "pullit" silverstein, and it free falling into it's own footprint, as well as being reported about before it actually fell, the whole 911 fairytale would be a lot harder to dissect. with wtc 7, it is obviously a false flag.

I don't remember anything to do with 'pods' there were some that showed a missile being shot. Just the same, I hope you find the one you're looking for. In the mean time, this one is still epic :)

2 planes went into 2 building s. No question