China Warns of Countermeasures if U.S. Puts Missiles on Its 'Doorstep'

Our nuclear subs put missiles in their bed let alone doorstep

It's like they're derpy.
US nuke subs would make the entire population belt positively glowing.

And all this because some greedy midget chinese didn't want a level trading field.

Chicoms just installed nukes in Venezuela.

I believe they're pissed.

China Devalued its money again. In retaliation for trade. So China is again worth nothing even more, Heres the thing that is going to work. They devalue themselves, with no trade for value. They are taken out of the game.

They are doing what they think worked in the past. Its not going to work when theres not much trade.

The idea would be to make trade at cheaper value. If there is no trade then there is no value. I think India and Pakistan have a lot of people that would love to have manufacturing jobs.

Last Edited by SoloTrashyCrowd on 08/06/2019 03:39 AM

Hey China, get fucked.

Let's just enforce the Monroe Doctrine already. Not sure what we're waiting for.

Enforce the Monroe Doctrine? We have a President who cannot get a cabinet confirmed. How is he going to enforce the Monroe Doctrine? This country is falling apart. That needs to be addressed, fuck the bs Monroe Doctrine.

This is not the start of another missile crisis fiasco like 1962, is it?

People always seem to forget China has nuke subs too. And they are likely permanently rotating on the american coastlines.

There is no possible defence. No possibility of interception.

But certain death of humanity as we know it.

That is the game trump is playing and you can bet your ass China also has a first strike option.

China is not Iraq. China can destroy you.

So in this reality we can be 99% sure nothing serious will happen. After all, we have a stable genius at the helm, surrounded by peaceloving advisors.

what
like some kind of BLOCKADE or a FAILED INVASION PLAN then .....

While that's true, they also shouldn't be devalue currency to skew the trade imbalance either

Well, beyond just the fair trade situation with China artificially pegging its Yuan/RMB currency over the years, then you have the fact that China built those artificial islands in key global shipping lanes within international waters of the South China Sea, promising the whole time not to militarize them and then guess what....they militarized them.

Look at the maps that China claims for its borders. They currently claim territories reaching right into their neighbors' territorial waters and exclusive economic zones, completing ignoring the 200 nautical miles rule.

China has ongoing border disputes with Bhutan, Brunei, India, Indonesia, Inner Mongolia, Japan, Malaysia, North Korea, Philippines, South Korea, Taiwan, Tajikistan, Vietnam.

China's actions tell much more than their words.

Well, beyond just the fair trade situation with China artificially pegging its Yuan/RMB currency over the years, then you have the fact that China built those artificial islands in key global shipping lanes within international waters of the South China Sea, promising the whole time not to militarize them and then guess what....they militarized them.

Look at the maps that China claims for its borders. They currently claim territories reaching right into their neighbors' territorial waters and exclusive economic zones, completely ignoring the 200 nautical miles rule.

China has ongoing border disputes with Bhutan, Brunei, India, Indonesia, Inner Mongolia, Japan, Malaysia, North Korea, Philippines, South Korea, Taiwan, Tajikistan, Vietnam.

China's actions tell much more than their words.

Now THIS should be pined instead of the Trump Comedy Show distractions.

would China install missiles on the USA's doorstep if they could?

What....no flied rice or fortune cookies?

Hot off the press -

China to hold fresh military exercises in disputed South China Sea
August 06, 2019 Jesse Johnson - Japan Times
[link to americanmilitarynews.com (secure)]

Excerpts -

Both notices warned that entrance is “prohibited” but gave no other details.

Beijing claims much of the South China Sea, though the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Taiwan and Brunei have overlapping claims in the waters, where the Chinese, U.S., Japanese and some Southeast Asian navies routinely operate.

Neither Japan nor the U.S. have claims in the waters, but both allies have routinely stated their commitment to a “free and open Indo-Pacific.”
. ADVERTISEMENT .

Washington has lambasted Beijing for its moves in the South China Sea, including the construction of man-made islands — such as those in the Paracels and further south in the Spratly chain — some of which are home to military-grade airfields and advanced weaponry.

If this video is true about directed energy weapons, missiles are not necessary to destroy infrastructure.

You're waiting for Congress to fund your free shit

Back when I was an aerospace engineer, I worked in SDI (Strategic Defense Initiative, aka, Star Wars).

Part of that was coming up with boost phase interception of missiles at sea.

Either a surface ship or one of our subs can shadow any Chicom boomers near enough to launch. Upon detecting a launch of an SLBM by the sub, they can launch anti-missile interceptors. A surface ship would be optimal in this role.

Most people think subs are not detectable when deep underwater. That is NOT NECESSARILY SO.

Also, any boomer can be taken out pretty quickly, possibly before it can launch all of it's payloads.

BTW, I do NOT advocate war with China. Prez T is using economic pressure to pursue a level field in trade.

We don't need intermediate range missiles in Asia. We have a secure second strike capability with current assets.

The advantage of IRBMs is very fast time on target and accuracy measure (perhaps) of less than one meter. At that level, you can drop a warhead down an air shaft into an underground bunker.

The most likely flash point for war would be an attempted invasion of Taiwan. Taiwan should consider a counter threat of asymmetrical warfare such as smart sea mines cutting off all sea access by China.

See, UK bots don't say anything

They rub thier bloody vagina on the carpet

yeah that's what I don't understand, what is the difference between these conventional missiles on it's doorstep, vs. when we already have Nuclear Missiles from untraceable Submarines in their oceans ??? can somone explain why this makes them mad when we already have subs in the region when they said these were conventional missiles ?? I'm curious

Depending on the type of guidance system, a IRBM (Intermediate Range Ballistic Missile) has greater accuracy.

I am talking accuracy sufficient to put a nuke down an air shaft at a deep bunker.

I think IRBMs are also cheaper to produce and maintain than SLBMs.