|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
BIGFOOT: Experts* Are Theorising That The ‘Bear’ That Saved A Lost Child Was Bigfoot
|
|
Poster Handle
|
BilloutWest |
|
Post Content
|
As bear researcher Chris Servheen from the University of Montana unambiguously told The Guardian, “I’ve never known such a thing to happen, bears don’t do that.” We can all agree that it is surely miraculous that little Casey survived, but we must also all agree that it is pretty unlikely that it was the friendship of a bear that allowed him to survive. Luckily, there is a very simple, very plausible explanation for how he managed to survive: Bigfoot. [ link to www.pedestrian.tv (secure)] He is right. Bears don't do that. Bigfoot doesn't either. We have firm evidence that Bigfoot doesn't even exist. The supposed Bigfoot DNA found has been shown to be bear DNA. This story comes full circle and actually helps prove that there is no Bigfoot or Yeti. ====== Of the nine “yeti” samples, eight turned out to be from bears native to the area, the researchers report today in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B. The other sample came from a dog. Similar studies of hair samples supposedly related to North America’s big hairy hominid, the sasquatch (aka Bigfoot), have revealed that those fibers came from bears, horses, dogs, and a variety of other creatures—even a human. No Bigfoot. Liar(or full of shit). There have been a number of samples tested that came back as "Part Human and Part Primate". Many hair samples too that came back as undocumented species! Countless stories of Military run-inns with the Sasquatch. Army bases in Pacific NW even have official protocols on what to do if/when you encounter one. The Government knows all about them but for their own reasons it all gets covered up. Of course this is nothing new, all Native American tribes have stories about them that go back centuries(They viewed them as another tribe). Too many people are hard headed, arrogant and this just continues the ignorance. Let me tell you, there are far worse(Dangerous) things in the woods than a Sasquatch. Arrogance abounds without evidence. No DNA no Bigfoot.
Eat it: Study finds that 'yeti' DNA belongs to bears: [ link to www.sciencemag.org (secure)] (But science has not borne this out so far. Previous genetic analyses of a couple of hair samples collected in India and Bhutan suggested that one small stretch of their mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)—the genetic material in a cell’s power-generating machinery that’s passed down only by females—resembled that of polar bears. That finding hinted that a previously unknown type of bear, possibly a hybrid between polar bears and brown bears, could be roaming the Himalayas, says Charlotte Lindqvist, an evolutionary biologist at the State University of New York in Buffalo.) Meanwhile people want there to be a bigfoot so much they spout off without any evidence at all.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
