Why does every thread about Jesus get an immediate 1 star ?

seems like its almost all threads that get the 1 star treatment.


prolly a chronic bed wetter

Some of us just get bored and would rather discus something other than Jebus. You Xtians really need to learn to read more books.

You do know you aren't obligated to discuss anything that is posted right?

Because the Christians on here are full blown nut jobs.

I do. I don't mind because that's what the pleebs want to discuss.

There's a lot of Satanic, Thelemic, and Chaote assholes in this BBS.

They think it's their duty to...

Well, whatever it is they think they're doing?

Magick, or whatnot?

It actually all works toward the greater good, because retardation and darkness highlights the wisdom and light of Christ.

So, just roll with it. They need to feel they're powerful for the time being.

shareblue satanic atheists

Kind of like you need to feel saved from your horrible past. Shame that you couldn't forgive yourself and try to be a better person. But no worries ... someone else died for your sins ... sounds just!

Thanks.

It is.

Yes, it's so just to have an innocent person die for your shit life. The Mayans did the same thing!

No, the Mayans didn't do the same thing.

They got shit people to die for their shit lives.

God in the flesh died for my shit life.

And he died for your shit life too.

I don't know how he turns lead into goldz but he does.

G-d is not a man. And each man dies for their own sins. He didn't die for my shit life. I'm responsible for me, like an adult.

You need to learn to spell God. God has an o in it, not a subtraction sign.

And God in the flesh did die for your shit life.

You've chosen to remain a piece of shit. And that's your choice.

Be shit, then.

God doesn't take shit.

Numbers 23:19

19 God is not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do it? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good?

Ezekiel 18:20-23

20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.

21 But if the wicked will turn from all his sins that he hath committed, and keep all my statutes, and do that which is lawful and right, he shall surely live, he shall not die.

22 All his transgressions that he hath committed, they shall not be mentioned unto him: in his righteousness that he hath done he shall live.

23 Have I any pleasure at all that the wicked should die? saith the Lord God: and not that he should return from his ways, and live?

-----

And you can continue worshiping a dead man-god, pagan.

Usually an agenda behind a poster who makes bible quotes.

Rarely are any Jesus quotes used on the internet for true good.

Satanists & atheiests will flat out 1* anything with a bible quote & hardliner Christians will also downvote if someone is trying to use a Jesus quote for nefarious reasons.

Just quoting Jesus doesn't get you 5*'s

So big deal they aren't harming you by read and posting.

Nope, but the 1 star lets them know they aren't doing well.

Because Angles do it!! Dua







:TrumpWBabies:

BTW, just in case anyone wonders, the Hebrew Masoretic text is corrupted at Numbers 23:19. The Masoretic is emphatically not the original Hebrew.

If you read the same verse in the much older (and correct) Greek Septuagint, you will see that it preserves the original Hebrew reading.

Numbers 23:19
God is not as man to waver, nor as the son of man to be threatened; shall he say and not perform? shall he speak and not keep to his word?

The Greek word is is used in both cases. Balaam is not indicating here that God cannot exist in human form. He is saying that God's nature is not as man's fallen nature to waver and be intimidated, because that is what Balak is attempting to do to God in this context.

The Masoretic text is a late corruption and carefully manicured text that was begun after the Bar Kokhba revolt. It is untrustworthy in many places and takes every opportunity and license to reword the text with a slant that is anti-Christian.

However, the Septuagint remains a firm witness of the original wording.

The Septuagint that we have to day dates far later, has been changed, and thus isn't a good source.

Again your Messiah is dead and isn't coming back. He claimed he was coming back to his own generation. But I'm guessing you have another version of your book to show that to be wrong as well.

Now please show me your own version of Ezekiel 18:20-23 as to disprove my other point.

I understand that you're upset that the Septuagint exposes your corrupted, biased Masoretic anti-Christian revisionist text.

You aren't the first to be infuriated by that fact and exposed as a fork tongued liar.

That's why the church, since the 1st century, has used the Greek Septuagint. Because we know you for the diabolical, opportunistic lying creeping vermin you are.

OP, this is the reason...

2nd Timothy 3:1-5

1 This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.

2 For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy,

3 Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good,

4 Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God;

5 Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.

I actually really don't care. I would however like you to disprove Ezekiel 18:20-23 where no one can die for anothers sins.

Then I would like you to convince me that the Messiah was to die for your sins without Isiah 53 because if that was the proof text the NT authers would have quoted it.

I would then like you to show me where the Messiah was going to take two times to bring Universal Peace (Jesus said himself he didn't come for that).

Then explain to me without 2 Peter that somehow Jesus wasn't going to return to that generation when the whole of the NT says that he would with the exception of 2 Peter.

Please, convince me of your dead pagan man-god.

Answer me this, snake: How does Isaiah predict that the Righteous Servant would bear the iniquities of the many?

He shall see of the travail of his soul, and shall be satisfied: by his Knowledge shall my Righteous Servant justify the many; for he shall bear their iniquities. - Isaiah 53:11

You literally just did what I told you not to do. The whole of Isaiah 53 speaks of Israel as a nation in the single form. This is proven by reading the rest of the other 3 songs in Isaiah that use the same literary device.

Also, the NT authors never quoted Is. 53. Don't you think they would have considering they misquoted everything else trying to prove a point?

I did exactly what you told me not to do because I hear the voice of the prophets and not snakes like you.

What we see in Isaiah is that a man can and will indeed bear the iniquities of others, but not just any man, the Upright Man, the Servant to come

I also have no idea what you mean that Isaiah 53 is never quoted in the New Testament.

It most certainly is.

Isaiah 53:1 is quoted in John 12:38

Isaiah 53:4 is quoted in Matthew 8:17

The Ethiopian Eunuch is reading Isaiah 53 in Acts 8

Acts 8:32-35
The place of the scripture which he read was this, He was led as a sheep to the slaughter; and like a lamb dumb before his shearer, so opened he not his mouth: In his humiliation his judgment was taken away: and who shall declare his generation? for his life is taken from the earth. And the eunuch answered Philip, and said, I pray you, of whom speaks the prophet this? of himself, or of some other man? Then Philip opened his mouth, and began at the same scripture, and preached unto him Jesus.

Paul quotes Isaiah 53 in Romans 10:16

That's not what that song is about. And if you were to quote the full song you would see how it doesn't line up with Jesus's life.

A man can't die for another man's sins. Ezekiel 18:20-23.

Again if Isaiah 53 was about what Christians claim, don't you think that someone would have quoted it?

I've already destroyed all your lying arguments, little snake.

So, I'm off to eat lunch, now.

I was really just posting this in case others actually swallowed your flimsy lies and wrestling's of Scripture.

I was born and raised Christian,
my parents were Christian

I found myself asking questions throughout my life, many things in the bible made no sense to me. The idea of once saved always saved, sending your son to be sacrificed so that you who are already all powerful can save the souls you created in the first place. The idea that for thousands of years no one around the world other than in the middle east area had even heard about Christianity, or Jesus. We're their souls created for the pits of fiery eternal damnation and hell. The fact that the book itself is written like a chinese finger trap. You stick you head in it and start reading it, next thing you know if you go woah this is kinda crazy, then you are told that you will burn in hell for eternity if you don't believe blindly with no real proof. How genius is that?

So I always had questions, it never made a whole lotta since anyway. Then there are the cherry pickers, those who go around and pick out lines and versus out of dead segments of the bible in order to control others, but they don't live their own lives by the entire books they are quoting, it's horribly two faced.

Then there is the theology and the sausage making of Christianity itself. The books are written as if they are in first person, as if there is a note taker there taking word for word dictation. It's impossible when the books were actually written 60 to 80 years after the death of Christ in some cases. Considering the average lifespan of a human back then was about 30 years, I mean maybe some old guy wrote them, or a few old guys, but they are more than likely a creation after the fact. It would be like me writing stories about the civil war, not only research and accounting of events, but sitting down and word for word telling you what the conversation was between a group of soldiers in a trench. A trench I never was in, a trench that perhaps, perhaps someone from that trench had told me about 60 years later, but this is word for word, biblical, literal text that must be obeyed not because as if it is the gospel, but it is supposidly the gospel of all time. The book. The book that took those eighty year stories a few hundred years later and under a roman emperor the cannon was created, it was the consolidation of all biblical stories. Constantine was the ultimate say in what got put into the bible, and what got you killed for having texts that were not. The dead sea scrolls explain this. So does the fact that there are many different versions of the book of paul, and other biblical stories. There is even a bible in the church in Turkey. It is the oldest consistantly inhabited christian church on the face of the planet. Meaning those bibles have been there for a long long time. In their bibles are different christian stories and books not in our modern bible.

Interpretation is another but not really the biggest concern.

Then there are the people that follow the Christian religion. How do you ever have a conversation with anyone who is convinced you are going to hell? I mean in their minds they've condemned you to a fate worse than death itself. They don't know you, they don't know who you are, they don't know what your beliefs are.

No, as I have gotten older, it has become too large of a leap to jump over.
If Jesus is real and exists and invite him to come visit me. My door is always open to him. I would love to sit down and have a conversation with Jesus.

In a world where I can turn on the television and four different news sites are reporting the exact day of an event the exact same story and everyone of them tell the story differently. I have reached my conclusion on my trust in humans to tell the truth without their own bias. It doesn't exist.

Even on this website, you can have a view on something that 90% on here agree with, the next day post something you personally believe in and get shredded for it. Censored, just like this site has been censored, like everyone is trying to censor everyone else.

It was just as political, and people were just as trust worthy in the times of Christ.

So no, I'm not a big fan of the ancient sumarian stories of Adam and Eve which got put into the bible, or alot of the older stories that are ripped off from history from other religions much older then plagiarized like the flood myth stories, etc. etc.

It's just too much for someone with a mind that questions or thinks for themselves.

Find some brainless people and tell your story with a stoic face and with passion and I'm sure you will recruit them.

I was raised Christian. I now believe in God, but I don't pretend that any man knows what that is.

I don't one star anyone by the way unless it is bashing someone who doesn't need to be picked on.