| Users Online Now: 2,142 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,528,857 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,218,446 | Threads Today: 609 | Posts Today: 12,271 |
| 05:59 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,142 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,528,857 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,218,446 | Threads Today: 609 | Posts Today: 12,271 |
| 05:59 PM | ||
CA Democrats Introduce LGBTQ Bill that would Protect Pedophiles who Rape Children | |
| Uncle Fuck Stick Offer Upgrade  User ID: 56341861  United States08/30/2019 09:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| bigD111 User ID: 65945302 United States08/30/2019 09:35 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| TBKNY User ID: 47077712 United States08/30/2019 09:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to pulpitandpen.org (secure)] Quoting: Uncle Fuck Stick State Senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) and Assemblywoman Susan Eggman (D-Stockton) introduced recent legislation “to end blatant discrimination against LGBT young people regarding California’s sex offender registry.” However, under their bill, SB 145, the offenders would not have to automatically register as sex offenders if the offenders are within 10 years of age of the minor. Wiener claims the current law “disproportionately targets LGBT young people for mandatory sex offender registration, since LGBT people usually cannot engage in vaginal intercourse.” Existing law, the Sex Offender Registration Act, amended by Proposition 35 by voters in 2012 (Ban on Human Trafficking and Sex Slavery), requires a person convicted of a certain sex crime to register with law enforcement as a sex offender while residing in California or while attending school or working in California. Wiener says, “Currently, for consensual yet illegal sexual relations between a teenager age 15 and over and a partner within 10 years of age, ‘sexual intercourse’ (i.e., vaginal intercourse) does not require the offender to go onto the sex offender registry; rather, the judge decides based on the facts of the case whether sex offender registration is warranted or unwarranted. By contrast, for other forms of intercourse — specifically, oral and anal intercourse — sex offender registration is mandated under all situations, with no judicial discretion.” More in link If men today were men from the old school, pedophiles would be dead before trial. Period. All of them. Die by my blade or swing by the neck you fucking piece of pedophile shit. |
| Sikhed User ID: 5898996 United States08/30/2019 09:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77637574 United States08/30/2019 09:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77938471 United States08/30/2019 09:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| bigD111 User ID: 65945302 United States08/30/2019 09:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77867810 United States08/30/2019 09:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to pulpitandpen.org (secure)] Quoting: Uncle Fuck Stick State Senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) and Assemblywoman Susan Eggman (D-Stockton) introduced recent legislation “to end blatant discrimination against LGBT young people regarding California’s sex offender registry.” However, under their bill, SB 145, the offenders would not have to automatically register as sex offenders if the offenders are within 10 years of age of the minor. Wiener claims the current law “disproportionately targets LGBT young people for mandatory sex offender registration, since LGBT people usually cannot engage in vaginal intercourse.” Existing law, the Sex Offender Registration Act, amended by Proposition 35 by voters in 2012 (Ban on Human Trafficking and Sex Slavery), requires a person convicted of a certain sex crime to register with law enforcement as a sex offender while residing in California or while attending school or working in California. Wiener says, “Currently, for consensual yet illegal sexual relations between a teenager age 15 and over and a partner within 10 years of age, ‘sexual intercourse’ (i.e., vaginal intercourse) does not require the offender to go onto the sex offender registry; rather, the judge decides based on the facts of the case whether sex offender registration is warranted or unwarranted. By contrast, for other forms of intercourse — specifically, oral and anal intercourse — sex offender registration is mandated under all situations, with no judicial discretion.” More in link If men today were men from the old school, pedophiles would be dead before trial. Period. All of them. Die by my blade or swing by the neck you fucking piece of pedophile shit. Commiefornia. Land of idiots. Let them all die. |
| thinking... User ID: 8919838 United States08/30/2019 09:46 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And very Democrap. Degenerate is the operative word. All liberals are degenerates. In his poem Human Pride, Marx admits that his aim is not to improve the world, reform or revolutionize it, but simply to ruin it and enjoy it being ruined: With disdain I will throw my gauntlet full in the face of the world, And see the collapse of this pygmy giant whose fall will not stifle my ardor. Then will I wander godlike and victorious through the ruins of the world And, giving my words an active force, I will feel equal to the Creator. “Looking for consciousness in the brain is like looking in the radio for the announcer.” – Nasseim Haramein, Director of Research for the Resonance Project |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 43199023 United States08/30/2019 09:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| ElleMira User ID: 76494359 United States08/30/2019 09:48 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77004061 United States08/30/2019 09:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77004061 United States08/30/2019 09:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 71088931 United States08/30/2019 09:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| xenophon User ID: 75856757  Australia08/30/2019 09:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77004061 United States08/30/2019 09:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to pulpitandpen.org (secure)] Quoting: Uncle Fuck Stick State Senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) and Assemblywoman Susan Eggman (D-Stockton) introduced recent legislation “to end blatant discrimination against LGBT young people regarding California’s sex offender registry.” However, under their bill, SB 145, the offenders would not have to automatically register as sex offenders if the offenders are within 10 years of age of the minor. Wiener claims the current law “disproportionately targets LGBT young people for mandatory sex offender registration, since LGBT people usually cannot engage in vaginal intercourse.” Existing law, the Sex Offender Registration Act, amended by Proposition 35 by voters in 2012 (Ban on Human Trafficking and Sex Slavery), requires a person convicted of a certain sex crime to register with law enforcement as a sex offender while residing in California or while attending school or working in California. Wiener says, “Currently, for consensual yet illegal sexual relations between a teenager age 15 and over and a partner within 10 years of age, ‘sexual intercourse’ (i.e., vaginal intercourse) does not require the offender to go onto the sex offender registry; rather, the judge decides based on the facts of the case whether sex offender registration is warranted or unwarranted. By contrast, for other forms of intercourse — specifically, oral and anal intercourse — sex offender registration is mandated under all situations, with no judicial discretion.” More in link defund california and let it rot in hell |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 31729382 United States08/30/2019 10:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28925333 United States08/30/2019 10:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to pulpitandpen.org (secure)] Quoting: Uncle Fuck Stick State Senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) and Assemblywoman Susan Eggman (D-Stockton) introduced recent legislation “to end blatant discrimination against LGBT young people regarding California’s sex offender registry.” However, under their bill, SB 145, the offenders would not have to automatically register as sex offenders if the offenders are within 10 years of age of the minor. Wiener claims the current law “disproportionately targets LGBT young people for mandatory sex offender registration, since LGBT people usually cannot engage in vaginal intercourse.” Existing law, the Sex Offender Registration Act, amended by Proposition 35 by voters in 2012 (Ban on Human Trafficking and Sex Slavery), requires a person convicted of a certain sex crime to register with law enforcement as a sex offender while residing in California or while attending school or working in California. Wiener says, “Currently, for consensual yet illegal sexual relations between a teenager age 15 and over and a partner within 10 years of age, ‘sexual intercourse’ (i.e., vaginal intercourse) does not require the offender to go onto the sex offender registry; rather, the judge decides based on the facts of the case whether sex offender registration is warranted or unwarranted. By contrast, for other forms of intercourse — specifically, oral and anal intercourse — sex offender registration is mandated under all situations, with no judicial discretion.” More in link If men today were men from the old school, pedophiles would be dead before trial. Period. All of them. Die by my blade or swing by the neck you fucking piece of pedophile shit. All I can see is that they want to align the "judicial discretion" given to vaginal intercourse with oral and anal intercourse. I don't see any particular reason a blowjob should automatically be a sex offender registration when pounding the pussy isn't, do you? Obviously, in these cases, the judge is making a determination as to whether the intercourse was consensual, and dictating registration on the sex offender registry based on that info. Seems reasonable to me. In the old school, a 23 year old impregnating a 15 year old wasn't even uncommon, it was typical. Then when she started to "show" the parents would marry her off. If the state has a 10 year grace period from age of consent, and it appear it does, then there is no reason this should only apply to heterosexual intercourse vs homosexual intercourse. Personally, I think 10 years is a bit, excessive, but it is what it is. I didn't make the law in California. I know that similar laws in other states that showed prejudice against homosexual sex have been held unenforceable by the courts for not showing "equal protection under law" and therefore, unconstitutional. |
| Ninbit User ID: 76723511 United States08/30/2019 10:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 76313497 United States08/30/2019 10:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Oh well , the pussy Patriots of Cali have sat by and let this happen for the last 40 years I have no fucks left to give. 25% of the State will be gone in a few weeks anyway by the 9.0 that's imminent. All the Sodomite areas will be crushed. Bye fruit cakes!! Everything west of I-5 will be gone . Yay!! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 72988617 United States08/30/2019 10:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77602834 United States08/30/2019 10:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to pulpitandpen.org (secure)] Quoting: Uncle Fuck Stick State Senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) and Assemblywoman Susan Eggman (D-Stockton) introduced recent legislation “to end blatant discrimination against LGBT young people regarding California’s sex offender registry.” However, under their bill, SB 145, the offenders would not have to automatically register as sex offenders if the offenders are within 10 years of age of the minor. Wiener claims the current law “disproportionately targets LGBT young people for mandatory sex offender registration, since LGBT people usually cannot engage in vaginal intercourse.” Existing law, the Sex Offender Registration Act, amended by Proposition 35 by voters in 2012 (Ban on Human Trafficking and Sex Slavery), requires a person convicted of a certain sex crime to register with law enforcement as a sex offender while residing in California or while attending school or working in California. Wiener says, “Currently, for consensual yet illegal sexual relations between a teenager age 15 and over and a partner within 10 years of age, ‘sexual intercourse’ (i.e., vaginal intercourse) does not require the offender to go onto the sex offender registry; rather, the judge decides based on the facts of the case whether sex offender registration is warranted or unwarranted. By contrast, for other forms of intercourse — specifically, oral and anal intercourse — sex offender registration is mandated under all situations, with no judicial discretion.” More in link If men today were men from the old school, pedophiles would be dead before trial. Period. All of them. Die by my blade or swing by the neck you fucking piece of pedophile shit. All I can see is that they want to align the "judicial discretion" given to vaginal intercourse with oral and anal intercourse. I don't see any particular reason a blowjob should automatically be a sex offender registration when pounding the pussy isn't, do you? Obviously, in these cases, the judge is making a determination as to whether the intercourse was consensual, and dictating registration on the sex offender registry based on that info. Seems reasonable to me. In the old school, a 23 year old impregnating a 15 year old wasn't even uncommon, it was typical. Then when she started to "show" the parents would marry her off. If the state has a 10 year grace period from age of consent, and it appear it does, then there is no reason this should only apply to heterosexual intercourse vs homosexual intercourse. Personally, I think 10 years is a bit, excessive, but it is what it is. I didn't make the law in California. I know that similar laws in other states that showed prejudice against homosexual sex have been held unenforceable by the courts for not showing "equal protection under law" and therefore, unconstitutional. Says the pedophile. I can't wait to watch your eyeballs pop out of their sockets when you hang |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 4812794 United States08/30/2019 10:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to pulpitandpen.org (secure)] Quoting: Uncle Fuck Stick State Senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) and Assemblywoman Susan Eggman (D-Stockton) introduced recent legislation “to end blatant discrimination against LGBT young people regarding California’s sex offender registry.” TOTAL bullshit. Minor changes to a law that has been around for over 60 years. . |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77962728 United States08/30/2019 10:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to pulpitandpen.org (secure)] Quoting: Uncle Fuck Stick State Senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) and Assemblywoman Susan Eggman (D-Stockton) introduced recent legislation “to end blatant discrimination against LGBT young people regarding California’s sex offender registry.” However, under their bill, SB 145, the offenders would not have to automatically register as sex offenders if the offenders are within 10 years of age of the minor. Wiener claims the current law “disproportionately targets LGBT young people for mandatory sex offender registration, since LGBT people usually cannot engage in vaginal intercourse.” Existing law, the Sex Offender Registration Act, amended by Proposition 35 by voters in 2012 (Ban on Human Trafficking and Sex Slavery), requires a person convicted of a certain sex crime to register with law enforcement as a sex offender while residing in California or while attending school or working in California. Wiener says, “Currently, for consensual yet illegal sexual relations between a teenager age 15 and over and a partner within 10 years of age, ‘sexual intercourse’ (i.e., vaginal intercourse) does not require the offender to go onto the sex offender registry; rather, the judge decides based on the facts of the case whether sex offender registration is warranted or unwarranted. By contrast, for other forms of intercourse — specifically, oral and anal intercourse — sex offender registration is mandated under all situations, with no judicial discretion.” More in link holy crap, sexual confusion is THE KEY to befuddling the human race is it not |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 73186423 United States08/30/2019 10:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Miss Bunny Swan User ID: 77759132 Australia08/30/2019 10:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 35053329 United States08/30/2019 10:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| TheLordsServant User ID: 77965572 United States08/30/2019 10:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77962728 United States08/30/2019 10:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to pulpitandpen.org (secure)] Quoting: Uncle Fuck Stick State Senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) and Assemblywoman Susan Eggman (D-Stockton) introduced recent legislation “to end blatant discrimination against LGBT young people regarding California’s sex offender registry.” However, under their bill, SB 145, the offenders would not have to automatically register as sex offenders if the offenders are within 10 years of age of the minor. Wiener claims the current law “disproportionately targets LGBT young people for mandatory sex offender registration, since LGBT people usually cannot engage in vaginal intercourse.” Existing law, the Sex Offender Registration Act, amended by Proposition 35 by voters in 2012 (Ban on Human Trafficking and Sex Slavery), requires a person convicted of a certain sex crime to register with law enforcement as a sex offender while residing in California or while attending school or working in California. Wiener says, “Currently, for consensual yet illegal sexual relations between a teenager age 15 and over and a partner within 10 years of age, ‘sexual intercourse’ (i.e., vaginal intercourse) does not require the offender to go onto the sex offender registry; rather, the judge decides based on the facts of the case whether sex offender registration is warranted or unwarranted. By contrast, for other forms of intercourse — specifically, oral and anal intercourse — sex offender registration is mandated under all situations, with no judicial discretion.” More in link If men today were men from the old school, pedophiles would be dead before trial. Period. All of them. Die by my blade or swing by the neck you fucking piece of pedophile shit. that's not even true, it was a pretty common thing back in the old days, men were men and not scared to death of sex. it's ALWAYS people like you who scream about nuking entire countries, indiscrimiately murdering ALL The children in a nuclear inferno. and of course, this is because you LOOOVE children soo much |
| St. Ranger User ID: 45513182 United States08/30/2019 10:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 60177665 United States08/30/2019 10:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Romans 1:22-32 received text new testament 22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, 23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things. 24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: 25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. 26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: 27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet. 28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; 29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, 30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful: 32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them. |
