|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
CA Democrats Introduce LGBTQ Bill that would Protect Pedophiles who Rape Children
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Coward |
|
Post Content
|
[ link to pulpitandpen.org (secure)] State Senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) and Assemblywoman Susan Eggman (D-Stockton) introduced recent legislation “to end blatant discrimination against LGBT young people regarding California’s sex offender registry.” However, under their bill, SB 145, the offenders would not have to automatically register as sex offenders if the offenders are within 10 years of age of the minor. Wiener claims the current law “disproportionately targets LGBT young people for mandatory sex offender registration, since LGBT people usually cannot engage in vaginal intercourse.” Existing law, the Sex Offender Registration Act, amended by Proposition 35 by voters in 2012 (Ban on Human Trafficking and Sex Slavery), requires a person convicted of a certain sex crime to register with law enforcement as a sex offender while residing in California or while attending school or working in California. Wiener says, “Currently, for consensual yet illegal sexual relations between a teenager age 15 and over and a partner within 10 years of age, ‘sexual intercourse’ (i.e., vaginal intercourse) does not require the offender to go onto the sex offender registry; rather, the judge decides based on the facts of the case whether sex offender registration is warranted or unwarranted. By contrast, for other forms of intercourse — specifically, oral and anal intercourse — sex offender registration is mandated under all situations, with no judicial discretion.” More in link If men today were men from the old school, pedophiles would be dead before trial. Period. All of them. Die by my blade or swing by the neck you fucking piece of pedophile shit. All I can see is that they want to align the "judicial discretion" given to vaginal intercourse with oral and anal intercourse. I don't see any particular reason a blowjob should automatically be a sex offender registration when pounding the pussy isn't, do you? Obviously, in these cases, the judge is making a determination as to whether the intercourse was consensual, and dictating registration on the sex offender registry based on that info. Seems reasonable to me. In the old school, a 23 year old impregnating a 15 year old wasn't even uncommon, it was typical. Then when she started to "show" the parents would marry her off. If the state has a 10 year grace period from age of consent, and it appear it does, then there is no reason this should only apply to heterosexual intercourse vs homosexual intercourse. Personally, I think 10 years is a bit, excessive, but it is what it is. I didn't make the law in California. I know that similar laws in other states that showed prejudice against homosexual sex have been held unenforceable by the courts for not showing "equal protection under law" and therefore, unconstitutional. Says the pedophile. I can't wait to watch your eyeballs pop out of their sockets when you hang
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
