Some of the top climate stories over the past two years forging a path towards removing the idiocracy of the mainstream anthropogenic global warming narrative claiming “it’s all your fault”.

Princeton was the first major university in the U.S. to come out right and demonstrate that a key foundational flaw pervaded every climate model created by the IPCC. It’s not complicated. It’s what was figured out through observation and lab reproduction back in 1996 in Copenhagen. There’s a major cooling resulting from the cyclic cloud creation cycles induced by an influx of cosmic energy from a weakened magnetosphere. The cloud cycle is Earth’s Sun shade reducing TSI and cooling the planet. The cloud cycle is underappreciated in the climate models by the IPCC. This work has been carried on over the past 3 decades by many different universities and even NASA had to update their briefing page by condemning the certainty with which climate forecasts (anthropogenic global warming) are delivered. As well as condemning the models as being at the very least needing to be 10 times better at ever dreaming of making such conclusions and statements of anthropogenic global warming.

Now while the skies are covered in clouds that shade our planet from receiving TSI, it was Yale who recently kicked off the oceanic uncertainty. They have warned of a cold climate bomb waiting to be unleashed. What they plan on releasing is the freshwater melt that results from the Beaufort Gyre dramatically affects the planet into a cooling phase. What this means is the unlocking of ice at our polar regions breaks down the circulation pattern in the oceans that keep the Northern and Southern Hemisphere temperate. The actual data on ocean temperatures has been under direct question for a long time. The recent publication in Europe with the Met office scientists suggested there were numerous errors that inhibit our ability to make large scale definitive statements regarding the ocean temperatures. Just last week Harvard joined in on the conversation. The 4 scientists that published their research confirmed the extremely poor record of ocean data, and go into detail on how the poor records got that way. They are beginning to paint a very unfriendly picture for the major claims for the anthropogenic global warming narrative.

The IPCC has now let in solar particle forcing in advance of their 2022 major report. It will be their first one to ever contain the impacts of space weather particle forcing on planetary dynamics. Those who already understand this data know it will show a very different story of climate attribution. As the rest of the century progresses, an increase of cosmic ray cloud production will result. The increase of cosmic energy results in large scale volcanic eruptions that increase cloud production and precipitation. The atmosphere cools, and once the oceans temperature catches up with the atmosphere from the ice that continues to be unlocked at the polar regions cooling the oceans, a true cooling phase begins on our planet. Anthropogenic global warming is a comedy show to those who understand the cyclic nature of our universe.

Spotty coverage: Climate models underestimate cooling effect of daily cloud cycle

[link to www.princeton.edu (secure)]

Cloud Climatology - Computer Climate Models

[link to www.giss.nasa.gov (secure)]


How a Wayward Arctic Current Could Cool the Climate in Europe

[link to e360.yale.edu (secure)]


LATE 19TH-CENTURY NAVIGATIONAL UNCERTAINTIES AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON SEA SURFACE TEMPERATURE ESTIMATES

[link to arxiv.org (secure)]

Recommendations for CMIP6 solar forcing dataVersion 3.2 available (final version)

[link to solarisheppa.geomar.de (secure)]