Why are they lying? The deadly truth behind the geomagnetic reversal

What would happen during a pole reversal?

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

I really liked this vid...op posted on previous page

oh it happens. and it is happening.

2nd link came from a book I've seen people pay over $1,000 for. It's quite hard to get your hands on.... hmmm. I wonder why?

I have the book and so does Ben from the suspicious0bserver channel. The difference is, I shared mine online and he won't.

[link to ia803109.us. (secure)]

archive dot org

/22/items/worldinperiltheorigin/World%20in%20Peril%20The%20Or​igin.pdf


that took me 2 minutes

It shows. The link doesn't work.

So, most of you know by now that Earth's protection against harmful radiation is getting weaker, as our magnetic field diminishes. What would be really interesting is if someone could get their hands on independently measured data of the magnetic field strength, and then we could compare them to official data. The modern publicly available data I can find, range from late 1990s to 2019. Some media report it having decreased by 10-20%. Some say it's now at a rate of 5% weaker every decade. One talks about it being 3.5% weakened in some latitudes, while strengthened by 2% in other areas since the 1990s. In 2003 NASA claimed it had weakened by 10% since the 1800s. If you combine all data, the higher 20% seems to be the likely formally measured decrease as of the end of 2019, because official authorities and most media have visibly done their part to downplay the danger we're in. The weakening magnetic field and the excursion or reversal are evidently now both exponential phenomena. Many scientists call them "unpredictable" and say they don't really know what the consequences will be, contradicting themselves. What should we expect?

None of this really makes sense. It's as if effort has been taken to make it as hard as possible to find the true facts, since most sources contradict each other. There is clearly incongruity between what is happening and what is reported. Sources say that the magnetic field is weakening 10 times faster compared to some earlier time, but how can they make that calculation now amidst this chaos of contradictions, when the movement of the magnetic pole excursion/reversal has been exponential since the early 1900s? By logic, the weakening of the magnetic field must then be exponential too. I have also found news claiming that the sun's magnetic field is ten times stronger than previously thought. That doesn't sound correct when the planet is so affected by what happens with the sun. Why can our magnetic field diminish and radiation levels go up (like cancerous UVB and UVC rays), if the sun's magnetic field is so strong? And shouldn't the sun's heliosphere also hinder some of this? Isn't there some symbiotic coherence to it?

If anyone has answers, new data or speculations, you're welcome to post in this thread.
I suck at research, but below follows the sources that I've found for now.

Please post yours if you've got anything interesting.


[link to www.zerohedge.com (secure)]

[link to www.poleshiftnews.com]

[link to www.scientificamerican.com (secure)]

[link to phys.org (secure)]

[link to www.livescience.com (secure)]

[link to planet-earth-2017.com (secure)]

[link to www.sciencealert.com (secure)]

[link to www.newsweek.com (secure)]

[link to www.todayifoundout.com]

[link to www.ndtv.com (secure)]


A paper on the consequences of the last magnetic excursion:

[link to agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com (secure)]

Additional papers linking extinctions and excursions/reversals:

[link to www.sciencedirect.com (secure)]

[link to www.cnr.it (secure)]

I don't believe in this theory of magnetic pole reversal. I'm not saying it's a hoax - the academics proposing it truly believe it & with good cause: you can find hematite stone everywhere around volcanoes that show a discernable polarity in the direction of magnetic pull. This in turn creates increasing layers of magnetic iron filaments in the stones which show this noticeable shift in direction across vast lengths of time.

I have my own theory, & here it is. (NOTE: I've never heard anyone else propose this but it jives with everything I believe to be true).

I believe our sun is part of a binary star system (meaning 2 suns that revolve around each other). The sister star around which our solar jewel orbits is Sirius (the Dog Star). This theory of mine is premised on a belief in the electric universe theory proposed by Walt Thornhil & supported by the Thunderbolts Project. It stands to reason that the rules which govern plasma physics should also hold true in the universe & our solar system. If our star is in a 24-26,000 year orbital cycle around Sirius, then that explains these shifts in magnetic direction in geologic formations. There is a halfway point in this orbit every 12K years approximately marked by alternating catastrophic occurences on our world when the 2 stars pass (when Sirius is inbound, Earth is burnt by fire... 12,000 years later, Earth is flooded). This is borne out in the Vedas & explains quite nicely the Yuga cycles imho. It stands to reason that this would also account for the shift in magnetic pull found in hematite (& not because the magentic poles of our planet reverse polarity). I find that theory implausible.

Every ancient religion & culture supports the notion of a second sun periodically appearing & wreaking havoc in our world. The Sanskrit Vedas (the oldest written texts on Earth, believed by Hindu scholars to be 100,000+ years old- though not accepted by Western Academia) support this theory. Nearly all ancient temples in Greece, Egypt, Turkey, India, & dozens of other countries as well as Celtic monuments such as Stonehenge are directionally oriented to the rising of Sirius in the East during the summer equinox. In fact, Egyptian civilization revolved around this all-important astronomical event (it heralded the flooding of the Nile & thus signalled the need to begin planting crops). Schwaller de Lubicz wrote a book "Temple of Man" where he meticulously detailed these findings over a 20-year period excavating & mapping an Egyptian Temple (the main one at Dendera I think but I forget- was a few years back when I studied these things).

The ancients from 100s of long-dead civilizations seem to all tell us the same thing. Our solar system (& hence our world) undergoes catastrophic periods every 12K years as we pass nearby our sister star Sirius in the halfway point of an elliptical orbit round each other.

The Academic Orthodoxy will never even consider ideas like these. Anything that challenges their dogma is suppressed, & professors are stripped of tenure & blackballed for daring to even mention it. Colleges are the place where the search for truth goes to die. I personally believe it to be true, & the historical evidence in favor of it is undeniable so far as I'm concerned.

My 2 cents.

[link to www.researchgate.net (secure)]

^Read this paper. Multiple other scientists are rechecking his equations and agreeing right on the site. Theres over FORTY research papers referenced. I'm not even going to bother taking the tomato plants in. Gotten fatten up the bug supply. Looks like we're fucked.

Angelo De Santis
National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology | INGV · Section of Geomagnetism, Aeronomy and Environmental Geophysics | Professor in charge
Solid Earth Physics (1999-2004) Geophysics (2004- present)

"The “critical time” tc would be 2034 ± 3 yr, where the curve will have a singularity, i.e., where the curve is tangent to the vertical dashed line drawn at the
critical time in the smaller picture. Our interpretation is that this time will represent the time
of no return for a great change of the geomagnetic field, possibly going toward a reversal or
excursion."

"When we compare the couples of the same fitting parameters with each other, the agreement is astonishing for
most of them: in particular, the critical time tc is practically the same (around 2034±3 yr
and 2033 ± 11 yr, for SAA and GSL, respectively; please note that the indicated errors5
are only statistical because they could be up to two times greater, Gross and Rundle,
1998); when the fit is applied to GUFM1-G and GUFM1-F the results change a little,
with a critical time ranging from 2014 to 2027; however, in both cases a critical process
is still compatible with model data. This means that the overall trend that is underlying
both quantities (SAA and GSL) is something real and not an artefact."

"Now one might ask why we are able to predict the point of no return from just a few
hundred years of a phenomenon that usually lasts several thousand years (Jacobs,
1994; but see also Nowaczyk et al., 2012, where the Laschamp excursion seems to
change the geomagnetic polarity in a few hundred years), i.e. with some analysis based
on data taken over a temporal window much shorter than the typical time scales of the
reversal or excursion process. A simple answer is that we are analysing a sufficient
(although short) time before the eventual critical transition: we believe that the recent
acceleration of both SAA and GSL is nothing casual but probably uncovers important
physical information regarding the evolution of our planet in the near future, such as
a possible precursor to the eventual close critical transition of the geomagnetic field."

Well for this cycle is Sirius inbound or outbound?
I'm fearing inbound... because we already had the flood.
But I would like to know