Lost you, or led you? ;] Please, recognize that my brief lines on the logic of semilanguages leads us to one possible conclusion: the semilanguages must be subsumed by one metalanguage M. Your body is structurally supported in the object-level semilanguage Lo; your psyche is dynamically stratified across sectors of the relational semilanguage Ls. But we know that every distinction, be it between ants, galaxies, or semilanguages, must converge on a "medium" which itself produces the programmatic opportunity for a psyche to perceive a stable distinction. This medium must serve as a metalanguage to the psyche distinguishing its body from external objects. Distinctions are variables of syntactic rules, which relate the variables, thereby logically dissolving any absolute distinction between the variables. Right? So these semilanguages are programmatically potentializing through the metalanguage M. The only rules forced by M lie in logical syntax. M is God. Some prefer Source. Personally, I prefer to say...Reality. Our souls are the autoprogrammatic (self-deterministic) mappings *between* Lo object-states and Ls psychical-relations.

If M is the metalanguage according to which all semilanguages must operate, then God is Reality. Deny this truth, and you simultaneously deny the very stability and intelligibility of the cognitive production of your question. It's as simple as that.

The existence of God is proven, perceptually, by the utter stability of your vicinity. The vicinity's stability entails that at least this reality exists in some sense. Period. Deny this incessant facial fact, and you are deludedly, contradictorily denying your expression's very reality.

So yes, we are here to help God evolve. This sentence translates to: humans are on Earth to help Reality evolve. And by the way, this is the best possible scenario.