|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Jesus is God
|
|
Poster Handle
|
TheLordsServant |
|
Post Content
|
Jesus doesn't speak during OT times.
The Father DOES!
I highlighted some things above that you are severaly overlooking.
Quoting: TheLordsServant Luke 1:32 - are you saying then that David is Jesus’ father or God? Your verse says both. Also, you indicate that the verses which are contained in the New Testament epistles do not carry as much weight scripturally as those verses which contain the words of Jesus in the gospels. Do you not believe all a scripture is inspired by God? Using Jesus’ words then, why do you think Nathaniel was so impressed when Jesus told him he saw him under the fig tree. Do you think it was Jesus ability to see from distance that made him declare Jesus the son of god and king of israel? Also, do you appreciate that ‘greater’ means ‘in position’, merely showing the ranking within the godhead? Do you know that ‘bar’ as son means more than just ‘son of’, if means someone is ‘in the likeness of’. Luke 1:32 - Not "my" verse - it came from the KJV. I believe "father David" is a poor translation. Here's others... [ link to www.biblegateway.com (secure)] ===================================================== "Inspired" scripture isn't "thus saith the Lord". NOR is it the words of Jesus, what was TOLD to Jesus to say by the Father. John 12:49-5049 For I have not spoken of myself; but the Father which sent me, he gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak.
50 And I know that his commandment is life everlasting: whatsoever I speak therefore, even as the Father said unto me, so I speak.===================================================== "Godhead"? Poor translation not found in most modern Bibles. Even if Paul DID use the word, I am sure that he only used it as a way to describe the Father, Son and Holy Spirit to a bunch of pagans who were already familiar with the "concept" as it is in many prominent pagan religions. It is the correct translation, regardless of what your opinion on the matter is. Most of the versions in your link confirm that. It confirms a need to fully understand what the people of the time knew and meant by the term ‘father’. On point 2, as Jesus is God, you are dancing on the head of a pin. Jesus IS the word of God. The bible IS the word of God. Every single bit. The bible is Jesus in print. You can’t take bits out, you can’t add bits in. Point 3, even if Paul was only doing as you said, he was clearly showing that the father, son and Holy Spirit ALL make up what is God. CHURCHIANITY 101. Which "Bible" is "Jesus in print"?   
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
