UKRAINE BIDEN EXPLAINED

And all the Democrats are implicated

Rudy gives a bunch more info on how big the scope of this is expanding into......plus a lot more

Listen to some common sense.......



[link to youtu.be (secure)]

Thanks, all help needed.

The dirt goes pretty deep here!

It does, and very quickly.

There are so many connections to so many people— it’s like is was open season for corruption

I think the Lou Dobbs has some very very damming accusations from Mr Mayor Rudy

Looks like colonel Saunders giving a speech on KFCs supply chain.

Thank you


George Webb!!!

When does exercise of legitimate presidential power become impeachable abuse?

Defenders of this (and previous) presidents commonly ask how a president can be impeached for exercising a power he undeniably possesses. This question not only ignores history, but turns the constitutional function of impeachment on its head by ignoring the crucial issue – the manner in which the power was exercised and for what purpose.

The founders included impeachment in the Constitution primarily to respond to misuse by the president of express or implied powers given him elsewhere in the document. To the founders, the main point of impeachment was that there must be a remedy when a president perverts the powers of his office, either for personal or political self-aggrandizement or when the president’s acts threaten the proper distribution of authority among the coordinate branches or otherwise offend the law or fundamental governing norms.

That said, any abuse of power case requires that we distinguish between legitimate and illegitimate uses of presidential power. The most common illegitimate purpose is self-interest. Our constitution confers power on government officials to be employed for the public good, not to advance the private interests of the official.

Although this principle is plain, its application can be difficult in the case of elected officials. When, for example, a president pursues a policy that is popular with voters, he furthers not only a policy objective but his personal interest in reelection. Most of the time, that is entirely appropriate. Indeed, it is an inescapable — and essential — feature of representative government. Presidents and other elected officers are to use their own judgment, but should also always bear in mind the wishes of their constituents.

Because public and personal interests are inevitably commingled in almost any exercise of presidential authority, whenever an impeachable abuse of power is alleged we must consider three points: first, whether the challenged action serves the president’s private interests; second, whether the president’s behavior can be justified by plausibly legitimate reasons of state; and third, whether, even if a plausible public purpose is suggested, the private interest so far outweighs the public one that the president’s action should be deemed a pretext, and thus an abuse of power.

The Ukrainian incident appears to be an impeachable abuse of power

In his dealings with Ukraine, Mr. Trump may have misused at least three baskets of executive authority: supervision of domestic law enforcement and national security agencies, the commander-in-chief power, and the conduct of foreign policy.

[link to www.justsecurity.org (secure)]

Ukrainian chicken?

Thread: Ukraine and Israel

Thanks Bodi. Glenn may have gotten temporarily side tracked, but the man is brilliantly spot on...

Last Edited by President Penny Peppers on 10/07/2019 12:04 PM

Actually Glenn Beck gave a stellar description of the whole timeline of corruption in Ukraine despite looking like Colonel Sanders.

Sadly because Beck has exposed it, no one is going to do anything about it.

You are correct. Presidential power, in some cases, place the President above the law. Such as launching US nuclear arsenal would be illegal for most people. The President holds sole authority over such use of American arsenal.

In some cases, the POTUS is the law maker. Only acts of congress can remove Presidential Power as defined in the Constitution.

Last Edited by Xeven on 10/07/2019 12:20 PM

WY HE LOS HIS JOB E JOB

Watched that earlier was a goo video.

I got a hankerin' for Beck Fried Chicken now.

Just kidding...

Glen Beck is pretty good at these things and everyone should watch and learn.

Carry on.

Beck did a good job getting the word out but some wish he would’ve gone there with the Republican involvement.
Both parties pounced on the vulnerabilities of Ukraine.
That’s why the people voted in a Nationalist (of sorts). Appears he wants to clean up the mess of foreign influence. He won 75% to 25%. This is the election Cindy McCain traveled the globe to oversee...bwahahahaha.

Good post Bod.

Beck actually started my “waking up”.

At 20 minutes in “...no one can do a chalkboard without this guy showing up”

Lee Stranahan did a segment on AJ show.
I usually can’t follow him but did a very good breakdown as well...

[link to 2ubii.com (secure)]

Focus on the message

TYSM for posting that!

He leaves one pertinent fact out .,.they used blackwater/academi to dress up as eastern Ukraine police to shoot the western "Ukraine" students protesting the George Soros ngo put their in the first place...most of them weren't even Ukrainian

the country is important to me. A relative of mine was there this past year. VERY odd experience.

VERY ODD

told a neighbor about it, the first thing out of her mouth was "child trafficking"

He's not spot on, he's spreading untrue foreign propaganda, and so are you.

THREAD Beeches

Got anything to back that up, or did you pull it out of thin air?

People who say "IMO" make mass shootings funny

Soooooooooo sad, congress is wasting tax money on protecting UK salves

You cry when punched in the face

Go fight Iran in combat, pussy