FATHER BOULAD: MY POSITION IS TO ENCOURAGE ALL THOSE WHO HAVE THE COURAGE TO RESIST THE ISLAMIZATION OF EUROPE



Is not the treatment of the migration crisis in Hungary contradicting the gospel that says you have to welcome the foreigner?
We have the duty to welcome the foreigner and to give him the maximum of possibilities to integrate, so that he builds the country at the same time as himself. But I think there is a threshold of tolerance to the reception.
We can not welcome everyone, all the misery of the world, when this threatens your inner balance, that of your homeland, your family, your environment, your culture, your heritage, and your values.
My point of view is that there are limits to the duty of hospitality. For example, if a boat that can take twenty people takes two hundred, every two hundred will sink. So I have the duty to limit. I can maybe take ten or fifteen, but from a moment, I have to say stop. It's not inhumanity, it's just common sense .
Especially if they do not want to integrate in Europe. I think Victor Orban is very courageous in his strong position to save the legacy of his country and Europe in the face of this crazy immigration to Europe, a position he holds despite all the criticism and the media campaign against him. I salute his courage and sincerity.
Is true Islam not moderate?
Islam is by definition political and radical, it has defined itself like that for 14 centuries . All those who wanted to modernize and reform Islam faced a wall, a refusal, and persecution. As Mahmoud Mohammed Taha, a large Sudanese leader who wanted to reform Islam rightly highlighting the Meccan verses, which are tolerant and open, unlike the Medina verses that have been favored by the thinkers of Islam in the X th century under the principle of "repeal". This Muslim leader was hanged on the main square of Khartoum in July 1985 for wanting to reform Islam. So for me Islamism, which we call extremist, radical, or political Islam , is Islam in its purity , Islam to discover . J I have written on this subject two very clear pages, available in several languages . Islamism is Islam.
So, let me not be told about a moderate Islam that exists only in the minds of Western intellectuals, in the "wishful thinking" of moderate Muslims who are not at all in the line of Islam advocated by al-Azhar University in Cairo, which until today trains tens of thousands of preachers around the world in the strictest, most rigorous, most radical, and most intolerant line of the Islam, despite repeated calls from Egyptian President Sissi to ask them to change their speech.
In other words, to imagine that moderate Islam will prevail is an illusion. The problem is not in the interpretations of Islam - moderate Islam, Sufi Islam - but the problem is in Islam itself, that is to say in the founding texts themselves. Any interpretation, especially from Westerners, is "wishful thinking": we want something, but the reality is different. Moreover, there is in Islam a principle called "taqiya" under which deception is justified in order to advance Islam: when one can not be right of the adversary because one is in a position of inferiority, one must enter into lies and duplicity. This is what is happening now: we believe their speeches are in French, but they say exactly the opposite in Arabic an hour later at the mosque. There are recordings that prove that. Europe must cling to its identity, that the Church also clings to its identity. No compromise, no lie, no hypocrisy .
The West and the Church are therefore in the illusion of their vision of Islam capable of reform.
What do you think of the dialogue with Islam? Let's be what we are. I ask for a frank, open dialogue, confronted with the story and the reality of the facts. We can not escape the truth. When I give you arguments and your only answer is to slaughter me, it is because we are no longer on the same ground. Currently, it is the answer of Islam . The Church currently refuses confrontation on the pretext of peace, but it is a false peace! Psalm 85 says " love and truth


Last week, in Alexandria, a Muslim convert to Christianity came to me saying: I converted 15 years ago, I recently married a Muslim, his father wants to kill me or report me to the police. The police will put me in jail, torture me until I say that I became Muslim again. So if the only answer is threat and violence, put things on the table, do not continue this dialogue in the lie!

e meet, justice and peace embrace each other ". Love without the truth? No. The truth without love? No. Justice without peace, or peace without justice? No. It takes a dialogue in the truth, not just by tapping one's shoulder, thinking that we are friends, drinking a good coffee together, it does not come to anything! Promoters of dialogue do not want to listen to those who have fourteen centuries of experience with Islam. My family emigrated from Damascus in 1860 following the massacre of 20,000 Christians. This, Europe does not want to understand, although they have also known this in their history, but they do not want to read their story. Except the Hungarians who are the only ones to have understood a little, because they knew 150 years of Ottoman oppression relatively recently. For the others, it is more distant,