GRAPHIC: US military officials confirm that the graphic video now circulating is true. In the video, Turkey-backed jihadists are seen massacring

Thank Trump for leaving a Vacuum.

The #Kurds have demanded the #Trump Adminstration to end #Turkey's Military Invasion or they will seek #Russia's Help.
[link to twitter.com (secure)]

Started with the Bush clan.
Most of us like Trump and hate the Bush family.

Check the GLP emoties.

The US leaving the area is totally insane, it will just require ANOTHER War against ISis

Wheres this video at..?

Its all a cluster fuck over there saddam and ghaddifi kept it under wraps.. funny those 2 kept middle east peace.. and usa russia and everyone else cant..

There is no video . It’s absolute bullshit

WARNING.

GRAPHIC

[link to twitter.com (secure)]

Ok Agent Shill

Like you were there

Read between the lines GLP and you too will become fluent in SUBTERFUGE

Furthermore notice how all the media are calling them TURKISH JIHADISTS now knowing damn well that’s ISIS and TURKISH SOLDIERS funded by Obama’s SHADOW GOVERNMENT and always has been

Why is the media providing cover that would destroy this President’s narrative that ISIS has been defeated?

laughable to say the least

with no ISIS, there's no need of USA being there

got the point

Footage of Turkish-backed jihadists executing civilians on M4 highway

[link to mobile.twitter.com (secure)]

f rotten rats

How is the outcome of this President’s policy regarding TURKISH ISIS SOLDIERS any different than what Obama would’ve wanted where now we have ISIS PRISONS being liberated by Turkish soldiers?

No matter how you cult members try and spin it, that just happened

President Obama was only a state senator when ISIS was founded

ISIS, Israeli Secret Intelligence Service

How the West created the Islamic State

Part 1 – OUR TERRORISTS

“This is an organisation that has an apocalyptic, end-of-days strategic vision which will eventually have to be defeated,” Gen Martin Dempsey, chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, told a Pentagon press conference in August.

Military action is necessary to halt the spread of the ISIS “cancer,” said President Obama. Yesterday he called for expanded airstrikes across Iraq and Syria, and new measures to arm and train Iraqi and Kurdish ground forces.

“The only way to defeat [IS] is to stand firm and to send a very straightforward message,” declared Prime Minister Cameron. “A country like ours will not be cowed by these barbaric killers.”

Missing from the chorus of outrage, however, has been any acknowledgement of the integral role of covert US and British regional military intelligence strategy in empowering and even directly sponsoring the very same virulent Islamist militants in Iraq, Syria and beyond, that went on to break away from al-Qaeda and form ‘ISIS’, the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, or now simply, the Islamic State (IS).

Since 2003, Anglo-American power has secretly and openly coordinated direct and indirect support for Islamist terrorist groups linked to al-Qaeda across the Middle East and North Africa. This ill-conceived patchwork geostrategy is a legacy of the persistent influence of neoconservative ideology, motivated by longstanding but often contradictory ambitions to dominate regional oil resources, defend an expansionist Israel, and in pursuit of these, re-draw the map of the Middle East.

Now despite Pentagon denials that there will be boots on the ground – and Obama’s insistence that this would not be another “Iraq war” – local Kurdish military and intelligence sources confirm that US and German special operations forces are already “on the ground here. They are helping to support us in the attack.” US airstrikes on ISIS positions and arms supplies to the Kurds have also been accompanied by British RAF reconnaissance flights over the region and UK weapons shipments to Kurdish peshmerga forces.

Divide and Rule in Iraq

“It’s not that we don’t want the Salafis to throw bombs,” said one US government defense consultant in 2007. “It’s who they throw them at – Hezbollah, Moqtada al-Sadr, Iran, and at the Syrians, if they continue to work with Hezbollah and Iran.”

Early during the 2003 invasion and occupation of Iraq, the US covertly supplied arms to al-Qaeda affiliated insurgents even while ostensibly supporting an emerging Shi’a-dominated administration.

Pakistani defense sources interviewed by Asia Times in February 2005 confirmed that insurgents described as “former Ba’ath party” loyalists – who were being recruited and trained by “al-Qaeda in Iraq” under the leadership of the late Abu Musab Zarqawi – were being supplied Pakistan-manufactured weapons by the US. The arms shipments included rifles, rocket-propelled grenade launchers, ammunition, rockets and other light weaponry. These arms “could not be destined for the Iraqi security forces because US arms would be given to them”, a source told Syed Saleem Shahzad – the Times’ Pakistan bureau chief who, “known for his exposes of the Pakistani military” according to the New Yorker, was murdered in 2011. Rather, the US is playing a double-game to “head off” the threat of a “Shi’ite clergy-driven religious movement,” said the Pakistani defense source.

This was not the only way US strategy aided the rise of Zarqawi, a bin Laden mentee and brainchild of the extremist ideology that would later spawn ‘ISIS.’

According to a little-known November report for the US Joint Special Operations University (JSOU) and Strategic Studies Department, Dividing Our Enemies, post-invasion Iraq was “an interesting case study of fanning discontent among enemies, leading to ‘red-against-red’ [enemy-against-enemy] firefights.”

While counterinsurgency on the one hand requires US forces to “ameliorate harsh or deprived living conditions of the indigenous populations” to publicly win local hearts and minds, “the reverse side of this coin is one less discussed. It involves no effort to win over those caught in the crossfire of insurgent and counterinsurgent warfare, whether by bullet or broadcast. On the contrary, this underside of the counterinsurgency coin is calculated to exploit or create divisions among adversaries for the purpose of fomenting enemy-on-enemy deadly encounters.”

In other words, US forces will pursue public legitimacy through conventional social welfare while simultaneously delegitimising local enemies by escalating intra-insurgent violence, knowing full-well that doing so will in turn escalate the number of innocent civilians “caught in the crossfire.” The idea is that violence covertly calibrated by US special operations will not only weaken enemies through in-fighting but turn the population against them.

In this case, the ‘enemy’ consisted of jihadists, Ba’athists, and peaceful Sufis, who were in a majority but, like the militants, also opposed the US military presence and therefore needed to be influenced. The JSOU report referred to events in late 2004 in Fallujah where “US psychological warfare (PSYOP) specialists” undertook to “set insurgents battling insurgents.” This involved actually promoting Zarqawi’s ideology, ironically, to defeat it: “The PSYOP warriors crafted programs to exploit Zarqawi’s murderous activities – and to disseminate them through meetings, radio and television broadcasts, handouts, newspaper stories, political cartoons, and posters – thereby diminishing his folk-hero image,” and encouraging the different factions to pick each other off. “By tapping into the Fallujans’ revulsion and antagonism to the Zarqawi jihadis the Joint PSYOP Task Force did its ‘best to foster a rift between Sunni groups.’”

Yet as noted by Dahr Jamail, one of the few unembedded investigative reporters in Iraq after the war, the proliferation of propaganda linking the acceleration of suicide bombings to the persona of Zarqawi was not matched by meaningful evidence. His own search to substantiate the myriad claims attributing the insurgency to Zarqawi beyond anonymous US intelligence sources encountered only an “eerie blankness”.

The US military operation in Fallujah, largely justified on the claim that Zarqawi’s militant forces had occupied the city, used white phosphorous, cluster bombs, and indiscriminate air strikes to pulverise 36,000 of Fallujah’s 50,000 homes, killing nearly a thousand civilians, terrorising 300,000 inhabitants to flee, and culminating in a disproportionate increase in birth defects, cancer and infant mortality due to the devastating environmental consequences of the war.

To this day, Fallujah has suffered from being largely cut-off from wider Iraq, its infrastructure largely unworkable with water and sewage systems still in disrepair, and its citizens subject to sectarian discrimination and persecution by Iraqi government backed Shi’a militia and police. “Thousands of bereaved and homeless Falluja families have a new reason to hate the US and its allies,” observed The Guardian in 2005. Thus, did the US occupation plant the seeds from which Zarqawi’s legacy would coalesce into the Frankenstein monster that calls itself “the Islamic State.”

Bankrolling al-Qaeda in Syria

According to former French foreign minister Roland Dumas, Britain had planned covert action in Syria as early as 2009: “I was in England two years before the violence in Syria on other business,” he told French television: “I met with top British officials, who confessed to me that they were preparing something in Syria. This was in Britain not in America. Britain was preparing gunmen to invade Syria.”

Leaked emails from the private intelligence firm Stratfor, including notes from a meeting with Pentagon officials, confirmed that as of 2011, US and UK special forces training of Syrian opposition forces was well underway. The goal was to elicit the “collapse” of Assad’s regime “from within.”

Since then, the role of the Gulf states – namely Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, and Jordan (as well as NATO member Turkey) – in officially and unofficially financing and coordinating the most virulent elements amongst Syria’s rebels under the tutelage of US military intelligence is no secret. Yet the conventional wisdom is that the funneling of support to Islamist extremists in the rebel movement affiliated to al-Qaeda has been a colossal and regrettable error.

The reality is very different. The empowerment of the Islamist factions within the ‘Free Syrian Army’ (FSA) was a foregone conclusion of the strategy.

[link to nena-news.it (secure)]

I don't give a shit about any of those dune coons. Why should I care? Would they come help my family if we were in need? Most of them hate Americans anyway. Waste of money to help them.

Wow

Nobody is stopping you from going down there and filling the vacuum.

Trump has lost a lot of votes and so has America.

Erdogan is very nice man

Thank Obama for starting a huge fucking war in Syria.

Can ANYONE tell me who the fuck is fighting who is northern Syria??? I just read that American forces were getting shelled by Turkish forces ?!?! I think the confusing news stories are intentional.

See this thread...

Thread: US Base comes under attack from Turkish Artillery

Is there ANY country Libs don't think we should be bombing?

One things for sure, they can’t shoot for shit.

someone gets it. we, erdogan, whoever have.. repeat HAVE to keep these medieval fucks fighting each other. because the moment they arent doing that... they will be attacking us. and not pathetic shit liek the 60s but using modern methods aided by our technologically advanced and cash rich enemies and their proxies.

i was listening to a London radio phone-in today and the fucked up shit and hatred between kurds and arabs is palpable even in the west where they are in (permanent) exile. turks and kurds do not mix here and do not talk shop in public. they hate each other and will never quit the struggle. I learned that the kurds living in arab areas were not allowed to speak their language or write it down and they fucking stayed there and accepted that shit. who does that? erdogan does not want 4 million syrian assholes running into in his land. his only option is to create a buffer zone. they are still going to cause him problems but he is in an advantageous position where he is on the way out politically and can crack some heads without too much heat. the kurds are pariahs there for siding with and taking aid from the west and also for their terrorist operations in Turkey which western MSM seems to forget.

fuck em all, i've got a grand prix, a leg of lamb and a few bottles of cab sav to enjoy. wake me up when they become human and stop fighting their great great great great great grandfathers pissing contests.

BREAKING NEWS!!

..it's the same old shit in the middle east regardless of US presence or video documentation.

For real people? This is nothing new and actually one of the tamest videos

Should we believe every vid on twatter unquestionably?

I trust no vid in these days of deep fakes and what not.

Validation is needed.

The UK could have certainly filled that vacuum had they wanted .