Fetzer Has to Pay Pozner 450K

I still think Sandy Hook was fake.

So what will Alex Jones owe?


Guarantee he will be out of business before the next election, at least for the last 6 months anyway.

Hillary wants a clear path to ignominy.

What about Ms. Vabner-Pozner? She recently married and is now Ms. Veronique Vabner Pozner de la Rosa?

Didn't they always live in Boca Raton and if so who/how were they allegedly living in Sandy Hook?

I seem to recall that the pics of the boy alleged to be Noah was actually her nephew and he was a twin and they lived in Washington State? Something like that?
It was posted to grandmother's facebook page with their drawings.

I just remember Veronique was a UN representative at one time supposedly and that is probably how his photo got mixed up in some foreign news story and recycled.

Meghan Kelly is being brought back to Fox to lure soon to be unemployed Alex Jones onto the network.

Jones often mentions how attractive he finds her.

So the CIA austinite will come in from the cold by going mainstream.

Expect Joe Rogan to interview a dishevelled Jones after his bankruptcy, and have a surprise guest, Meghan Kelly who will invite Jones onto Fox.

Wow you're delusional. Alex Jones wouldn't go to fuax news. His audience is 20X bigger. It would be a step down for him.

You really are stupid.

Jim Fetzer was sued by a single Sandy Hook parent.

He lost.

Fetzer has to pay $450,000 in damages.

Alex Jones is being sdued by ALL Sandy Hook parents.

26 victims times $450,000 settlements = @13 Million.

Jones doesn't have that.

That means bankruptcy and the end of Infowars.

But the Rothschild's know he could be a useful tool.
And he is perverted, so easily controlled.

The Pozner's had three kids, twins Noah and Arielle and daughter Sophia. Veronique had two older children with Reuben Vabner.

Here are are all five of the kids Mother's Day 20012:

[link to imgur.com (secure)]

Veronique Pozner is/was a nurse, there was another Veronique Haller that worked at the UN.

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Here is the UN's Veronique's Twitter:

[link to twitter.com (secure)]

One of the many things the Sandy Hook hoaxers got wrong.

Put down the pipe, tard.

Kelly's not going to Fox.

Fox would never in 10 thousand years employ Alex F'n Jones and everybody knows it.

This doesn't tell you anything about sh. But it tells you that the judicial system is part of the system, so to speak. Like you didn't know. Sooner or later you will go to court for something. If you visit this site, you're on the list of people who have rigged trials.

Never will happen.

Of course the only explanation has to be be a corrupt court, can't be that Fetzer was just wrong about his theory.

Kelly is only going on Carlson's show for an interview. Meanwhile CBS is possibly starting up a Conservative news channel and might bring in Kelly for that.

[link to theweek.com (secure)]

Sandy Hook is fake
AJ didn't write the book.
AJ hasn't made money from SH at all.
That is why he is not in this.
He wasn't part of it.

Jones did nothing wrong, so there is that.

AJ states FOX offered him the Beck role years ago to the tunes of 10's of millions.
He said no.

Jones is part of other lawsuits.

Noah Pozner died TWICE and you gun nuts still won't turn in your rifles. Beto will do the right thing for Noah.

Didn't Alex have Fetzer on his program a couple times?

There's strong proof that the judge is corrupt here. The constitution says "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation..."

If you initiate a defamation lawsuit, you basically are saying enough is enough I want justice and I hereby agree to air out my undies. So, that's what LP did. But then, the judge goes against the constitution and wants the trial done in secret so that JF doesn't get his constitutional rights. So, the judge has to a member. This doesn't mean JF isn't. Just that the judge is. Here's a quote from the your article:

"Fetzer last month was found in contempt of court for sharing a confidential deposition of Pozner with fellow Sandy Hook “researchers” and ordered to make attempts to get the document back, as well as to pay the plaintiff’s attorneys $7,000 to cover the cost of bringing the contempt complaint."

Think about it. It's unconstitutional.

How was the trial done in secret? There was a jury for the amount Fetzer had to pay. So fetzer had his chance to sway the jury to his side, but he failed.

Because the Pozner deposition was declared secret, that's part of the trial. The verdict etc. was public, but not the parts that showed that JF is innocent.

Yep.

AJ is another Ponzi useful idiot.

When you are sitting around the table and you can't identify the Ponzi, YOU are the Ponzi.

I remember you couldn't speak his name here before.

Not all depositions are made public. Jones' was in trial, but that is not always the case. Fetzer attended Pozner's deposition, so it was not done in secret.

You are saying all is ok because the accused was able to see the deposition. But that's not what the constitution grants.

The primary question at hand is if the judge is corrupt or not. The constitution grants the right of the public to oversee a trial against you to ensure that the court is not a kangaroo court. You're friends and family are supposed to get to see what's going on. This is designed as a safety net in case the judge is corrupt to allow the public to not re-elect any corrupt judges.

For this to occur, the deposition needed to be accessible to the public. NOT JUST JF. Because it isn't, and is secret, it's unconstitutional.

There may be different trials where a judge might make a deposition secret. Perhaps a child custody case, for instance. It doesn't matter, and this isn't such a trial anyways.

Depositions are not always public record, they can be sealed. So it's not unconstitutional for the public not to see it. Fetzer attended the deposition and the attorney he brought in had access to it as well.

When it turns out that HRC and BLUMENTHAL are behind these bogus cases against Alex Jones, then it is clear this is a trap and that the truth that Sandy Hook is a HOAX is simply more reinforced when we denang dick and HRC hanging around.

You already said that. You're repeating yourself instead of refuting my arguments.

And, what you are basically saying is that because other judges are corrupt, this one isn't. I'd say no it means they are all corrupt.

But it depends on the rationale for why it was sealed. Also you are missing the question of if the jury was allowed to see and consider that deposition. And still ignoring that LP forego any rights of privacy by filing the lawsuit.

Last Edited by confused_but_not_idiot on 10/16/2019 12:28 PM

Some judges are corrupt, some aren't. Just because Fetzer lost this case doesn't make the judge corrupt.

Pozner testified during the jury trial. The article does not whether or not the jury saw the Pozner or any of the depositions. Since Pozner testified before the jury, they may not have been a need for them to see it.

[link to answers.uslegal.com (secure)]