New Analytics Show Trump Might SWEEP With Nearly 400 Electoral Votes In 2020 | |
Interested_1 User ID: 75644492 United States 10/16/2019 09:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Great find! After watching last night's dem 'debate,' I can assure you that no living person with 2 active brain cells would vote for any of those clowns. Of course, retards, dead people and illegals might, but no one in their right mind. Take the red pill now...later it will come as a suppository. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77983873 United States 10/16/2019 09:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Vasily User ID: 76019691 United States 10/16/2019 09:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75875121 United States 10/16/2019 09:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75875121 United States 10/16/2019 09:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77864894 United States 10/16/2019 09:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
KnightsoftheRoundTable User ID: 73575355 United States 10/16/2019 11:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
keybored (OP) User ID: 77443882 Belgium 10/16/2019 11:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not out of bed yet. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78067381 United States 10/16/2019 11:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77917930 United States 10/16/2019 12:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71703239 United States 10/16/2019 01:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
diverdan01 User ID: 61629722 United States 10/16/2019 01:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Umm. The guy's own data shows Trump loses if turnout is big. Turnout will be huge when Trump is not impeached. Democrats don't want him in office. This last election had huge turnout. There's no reason to suspect the same won't happen this time. How can you not see your own data? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77917930 LOL..his own data my ass. Unless if factors in the millions of stolen votes for dems via hacked voting machines and stuff ballots |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2109343 United States 10/16/2019 02:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Q33 User ID: 78072747 Canada 10/16/2019 02:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76809044 United States 10/16/2019 02:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71031258 United States 10/16/2019 02:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
keybored (OP) User ID: 77443882 Belgium 10/16/2019 02:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Umm. The guy's own data shows Trump loses if turnout is big. Turnout will be huge when Trump is not impeached. Democrats don't want him in office. This last election had huge turnout. There's no reason to suspect the same won't happen this time. How can you not see your own data? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77917930 Turnout doesn't just apply to Dems, you know. Many people didn't vote in the last election that weren't Dems because they didn't see the point as they thought Trump wouldn't win but a lot of them will be voting Trump this time. Plus, dead people, illegals and those who vote more than once don't count. |
keybored (OP) User ID: 77443882 Belgium 10/16/2019 02:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 64007833 United States 10/16/2019 02:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
1911 Aficianado User ID: 76815743 United States 10/16/2019 02:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69226408 United States 10/16/2019 02:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5869998 United States 10/16/2019 02:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
alwaysme User ID: 77942092 United States 10/16/2019 02:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Umm. The guy's own data shows Trump loses if turnout is big. Turnout will be huge when Trump is not impeached. Democrats don't want him in office. This last election had huge turnout. There's no reason to suspect the same won't happen this time. How can you not see your own data? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77917930 Turnout doesn't just apply to Dems, you know. Many people didn't vote in the last election that weren't Dems because they didn't see the point as they thought Trump wouldn't win but a lot of them will be voting Trump this time. Plus, dead people, illegals and those who vote more than once don't count. Indeed! Record turnout in Louisiana this past weekend, forced a runoff in the governor's race... thus ensuring the imminent removal of the current Democrat governor! :) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77798626 United States 10/16/2019 02:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Lol...this is the Moody’s analytics model again. Let’s have a look at how they did in the last election. November 1, 2016 A model that has correctly predicted the winner of every U.S. presidential race since Ronald Reagan in 1980 is forecasting a big victory for Hillary Clinton. Clinton is expected to get 332 electoral votes, while Trump is predicted to get just 206, according to the Moody's Analytics model, which is based on three economic and three political factors. [link to money.cnn.com (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77798626 United States 10/16/2019 02:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hillary Clinton will win the 2016 presidential election, defeating Republican Donald Trump easily, by a comfortable if not landslide margin, Moody’s predicts. Moody’s is a key player in the United States economy, providing credit ratings that can shape the value of stocks, bonds and other financial instruments. But the wide-ranging research firm also, every four years since 1980, issues a prediction in the presidential election. The Moody’s prediction is based not on polls, but on economic and historical factors at the national and state levels. Based this year largely on low gas prices nationwide and healthy favorability ratings for outgoing president Barack Obama, Moody’s issued its prediction on Tuesday — calling a Clinton victory with 322 electoral votes. That’s 52 more than the 270 required to take the presidency. The confident Moody’s prediction contrasts with many national polls which have shown the Trump vs. Clinton race growing closer in the final week before the November 8 balloting. [link to heavy.com (secure)] |
JJ Johns J to the 3rd User ID: 78039514 Switzerland 10/16/2019 02:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Great find! Quoting: Interested_1 After watching last night's dem 'debate,' I can assure you that no living person with 2 active brain cells would vote for any of those clowns. Of course, retards, dead people and illegals might, but no one in their right mind. no one in their right mind, in other words, libtard democrats. either way, great news! . . No clotshot, NEVER! . Mad as hell! . |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77134005 United States 10/16/2019 02:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77949174 United States 10/16/2019 02:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Lol...this is the Moody’s analytics model again. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77798626 Let’s have a look at how they did in the last election. November 1, 2016 A model that has correctly predicted the winner of every U.S. presidential race since Ronald Reagan in 1980 is forecasting a big victory for Hillary Clinton. Clinton is expected to get 332 electoral votes, while Trump is predicted to get just 206, according to the Moody's Analytics model, which is based on three economic and three political factors. [link to money.cnn.com (secure)] Nate Silver, the noted polling analyst and statistician, said Monday that on a scale of one to 10, Democrats should panic about the possible results of the presidential election at a level of “five or six.” That would be a high degree of panic — but according to Moody’ Analytics, a financial firm whose presidential prediction model has never missed the mark, Democrats should not panic at all. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77798626 Hillary Clinton will win the 2016 presidential election, defeating Republican Donald Trump easily, by a comfortable if not landslide margin, Moody’s predicts. Moody’s is a key player in the United States economy, providing credit ratings that can shape the value of stocks, bonds and other financial instruments. But the wide-ranging research firm also, every four years since 1980, issues a prediction in the presidential election. The Moody’s prediction is based not on polls, but on economic and historical factors at the national and state levels. Based this year largely on low gas prices nationwide and healthy favorability ratings for outgoing president Barack Obama, Moody’s issued its prediction on Tuesday — calling a Clinton victory with 322 electoral votes. That’s 52 more than the 270 required to take the presidency. The confident Moody’s prediction contrasts with many national polls which have shown the Trump vs. Clinton race growing closer in the final week before the November 8 balloting. [link to heavy.com (secure)] Moody’s election model predicts Clinton will have a landslide victory Moody's Analytics has called the presidential election accurately since 1980. This election season, Moody's says Clinton will win by a landslide. [link to www.businessinsider.com (secure)] |
Brown Chicken Brown Cow User ID: 77197295 United States 10/16/2019 02:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78080738 United States 10/16/2019 02:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |