|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
NEW: Sen. Lindsey Graham does not rule out the possibility of Trump impeachment and conviction if new evidence emerges
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Coward |
|
Post Content
|
#1 for Quid Pro Quo to be a crime it must benefit Trump financially and personally. (What Joe Biden did not trump)
#2 the US Senate holds Trials for Impeachment, Not the congress, all they can do is an Impeachment Inquiry.
#3 for an Impeachment Inquiry, to be legal it must be voted on and held on the house floor. (which it is not)
Quoting: Jake "#2 the US Senate holds Trials for Impeachment, Not the congress, all they can do is an Impeachment Inquiry." That's a good one. Let me explain something for you: The Congress is bicameral and is composed of two chambers - the House of Representatives and the Senate. The House hears debate on articles of impeachment and then votes on them. The Senates conducts a trial based on those articles and then votes on whether an officer, such as the president, should be convicted and removed. Yes but the House isn't doing that... there is no Impeachment Inquiry on the house floor. It was voted down 3 times by democrats.. What adam schiff is doing in the basement is not legal.. What house rules say, there must be house rules for Impeachment, If no rules are set forth House rules Precedent take hold. Nancy put forth no house rules for Impeachment which means Precedent is set, Meaning she must hold an Impeachment Inquiry on the house floor. Which she isn't. So there is no impeachment. Can you at least make an attempt to write in coherent and at least semi-literate English so that it is easier to understand and reply? I give up on that word salad.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
