God cannot not exist | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78091106 United States 10/21/2019 03:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | A fact. There must be a Creator of everything that exists. Be it matter, physics laws and Spirit. Though, we have different beliefs about His nature, God/Creator is a must-be Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9734441 Thing is, many here in this world and dimension try to confine God to the same linear thinking in terms of time and space and so, that's where many make mistakes in their understanding about God and/or eternity. Look at your computer screen and bring up a 3-D style video game. Then walk to the side of that monitor and play it from an 85-89 degree angle (so that it's truly looking like what it truly is) and immediately, the ILLUSION of 3D disappears and the flat, 2D experience destroys it all in an instance. Now imagine God trying to do the same by relegating down to 3D/4D thinking when God's true existence is in a 5D (or higher) order of being? 5D is REAL TIME. Everything exists and occupies the SAME SINGULAR POINT AND LOCALE IN TIME AND SPACE... Much like our brain, thoughts and memories. Actions we perform and commit happen in 3D/4D reality. Actions we remember or experience while the are happening, are processed in the 5D process in our brain. |
Free Indeed 73 User ID: 3472861 Canada 10/21/2019 03:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Face an early morning rising Sun Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78047891 Breathe slowly and deeply chanting Amen-Ra pituitary secretes DMT, ego dies, you assume the form of God Nonsense, Jesus is Lord, you art thou but dirt. Humbly ask Jesus to show himself to you and watch your life change in an amazing way forever!! Do it, I dare you!! Life is short Death is sure Sin the cause Christ the cure! |
Reilly User ID: 78097796 United States 10/21/2019 03:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: MaybeTrollingUAgain You're confusing the idea of something with the thing itself. "I exist, therefore god exists", is a flawed argument. God is the thing that compels everything, is a claim. Therefore, you must present evidence for it. It is very easy to disprove it. I'm here typing, there is no god making me do it. There, done it. I don't need evidence to prove that "God" is the thing that compels everything, because "God" is a definition of that. How can you disprove a definition? The only thing there that you possibly question is whether or not everything is "compelled". Which I think it's obvious that something is compelling everything to happen, for everything happens. Then you need evidence for that definition. What you're doing is called "god of the gaps". Google it up. By defining 'that which compels everything' as "God".......... I am simply defining something which I don't need evidence for. Does everything happen? Is everything that happens 'compelled'? I don't see how it would be compelled.... or else it wouldn't happen. Or maybe "that which makes things happen" would be better suited to be defined as "God". Simpler. Things happen. You can't disprove that. Something makes things happen, for they do indeed happen. Something makes everything happen. And we simply define that thing which makes everything happen... and "God". You can't disprove a definition of something which we humans created. It's just a definition of something. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77449541 United States 10/21/2019 03:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
MaybeTrollingUAgain User ID: 76840347 Brazil 10/21/2019 03:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: MaybeTrollingUAgain You're confusing the idea of something with the thing itself. "I exist, therefore god exists", is a flawed argument. God is the thing that compels everything, is a claim. Therefore, you must present evidence for it. It is very easy to disprove it. I'm here typing, there is no god making me do it. There, done it. I don't need evidence to prove that "God" is the thing that compels everything, because "God" is a definition of that. How can you disprove a definition? The only thing there that you possibly question is whether or not everything is "compelled". Which I think it's obvious that something is compelling everything to happen, for everything happens. Then you need evidence for that definition. What you're doing is called "god of the gaps". Google it up. By defining 'that which compels everything' as "God".......... I am simply defining something which I don't need evidence for. Does everything happen? Is everything that happens 'compelled'? I don't see how it would be compelled.... or else it wouldn't happen. Aw, yes you need evidence. "God is what compels everything", is a claim. Conclusion without evidence is faith and therefore, irrational. Your personal incredulity doesn't make it real. Everything you claim, must be accompanied by evidence. No evidence, no credibility. MaybeTrollingUAgain |
Reilly User ID: 78097796 United States 10/21/2019 03:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "God" is simply a definition that humans created of 'that which makes everything happen'. You can't disprove "God", because it's just a definition of something (that is real), which humans created. The next question could be.... Is God conscious? Well..... If the definition of 'that which makes everything happen' is "God"...... And we humans are part of everything.... and we are conscious...... Then God is therefore conscious, because we are conscious.... and God makes everything happen.... including us. |
MaybeTrollingUAgain User ID: 76840347 Brazil 10/21/2019 03:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So to summarize - Quoting: Reilly 78097796 "God" is simply a definition that humans created of 'that which makes everything happen'. You can't disprove "God", because it's just a definition of something (that is real), which humans created. The next question could be.... Is God conscious? Well..... If the definition of 'that which makes everything happen' is "God"...... And we humans are part of everything.... and we are conscious...... Then God is therefore conscious, because we are conscious.... and God makes everything happen.... including us. Its amusing how you just can't see the flaw on your twisted logic. MaybeTrollingUAgain |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78047891 United States 10/21/2019 03:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Reilly User ID: 78097796 United States 10/21/2019 03:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Reilly 78097796 I don't need evidence to prove that "God" is the thing that compels everything, because "God" is a definition of that. How can you disprove a definition? The only thing there that you possibly question is whether or not everything is "compelled". Which I think it's obvious that something is compelling everything to happen, for everything happens. Then you need evidence for that definition. What you're doing is called "god of the gaps". Google it up. By defining 'that which compels everything' as "God".......... I am simply defining something which I don't need evidence for. Does everything happen? Is everything that happens 'compelled'? I don't see how it would be compelled.... or else it wouldn't happen. Aw, yes you need evidence. "God is what compels everything", is a claim. Conclusion without evidence is faith and therefore, irrational. Your personal incredulity doesn't make it real. Everything you claim, must be accompanied by evidence. No evidence, no credibility. "God is what compels everything" is not a claim, it's a fact. "God" is merely human definition of "what compels everything". You can not disprove a definition. If I define something previously undefined as "ldskfsldkf".... how can you "disprove" that???? You can't. It's just a definition! And that is exactly what "God" is. A definition of something. You can't disprove a definition of something. "God" is the human definition of "that which makes everything happen". Does everything happen? Yes. And we define that which makes everything happen as "God". You simply can't disprove that, because it's just a definition. |
Reilly User ID: 78097796 United States 10/21/2019 03:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: MaybeTrollingUAgain Then you need evidence for that definition. What you're doing is called "god of the gaps". Google it up. By defining 'that which compels everything' as "God".......... I am simply defining something which I don't need evidence for. Does everything happen? Is everything that happens 'compelled'? I don't see how it would be compelled.... or else it wouldn't happen. Aw, yes you need evidence. "God is what compels everything", is a claim. Conclusion without evidence is faith and therefore, irrational. Your personal incredulity doesn't make it real. Everything you claim, must be accompanied by evidence. No evidence, no credibility. "God is what compels everything" is not a claim, it's a fact. "God" is merely human definition of "what compels everything". You can not disprove a definition. If I define something previously undefined as "ldskfsldkf".... how can you "disprove" that???? You can't. It's just a definition! And that is exactly what "God" is. A definition of something. You can't disprove a definition of something. "God" is the human definition of "that which makes everything happen". Does everything happen? Yes. And we define that which makes everything happen as "God". You simply can't disprove that, because it's just a definition. Do you understand? |
MaybeTrollingUAgain User ID: 76840347 Brazil 10/21/2019 03:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: MaybeTrollingUAgain Then you need evidence for that definition. What you're doing is called "god of the gaps". Google it up. By defining 'that which compels everything' as "God".......... I am simply defining something which I don't need evidence for. Does everything happen? Is everything that happens 'compelled'? I don't see how it would be compelled.... or else it wouldn't happen. Aw, yes you need evidence. "God is what compels everything", is a claim. Conclusion without evidence is faith and therefore, irrational. Your personal incredulity doesn't make it real. Everything you claim, must be accompanied by evidence. No evidence, no credibility. "God is what compels everything" is not a claim, it's a fact. "God" is merely human definition of "what compels everything". You can not disprove a definition. If I define something previously undefined as "ldskfsldkf".... how can you "disprove" that???? You can't. It's just a definition! And that is exactly what "God" is. A definition of something. You can't disprove a definition of something. "God" is the human definition of "that which makes everything happen". Does everything happen? Yes. And we define that which makes everything happen as "God". You simply can't disprove that, because it's just a definition. Sorry to burst your bubble, but "God is what compels everything" is indeed a claim. I'm typing and no "god" compels me. MaybeTrollingUAgain |
MaybeTrollingUAgain User ID: 76840347 Brazil 10/21/2019 03:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Reilly 78097796 By defining 'that which compels everything' as "God".......... I am simply defining something which I don't need evidence for. Does everything happen? Is everything that happens 'compelled'? I don't see how it would be compelled.... or else it wouldn't happen. Aw, yes you need evidence. "God is what compels everything", is a claim. Conclusion without evidence is faith and therefore, irrational. Your personal incredulity doesn't make it real. Everything you claim, must be accompanied by evidence. No evidence, no credibility. "God is what compels everything" is not a claim, it's a fact. "God" is merely human definition of "what compels everything". You can not disprove a definition. If I define something previously undefined as "ldskfsldkf".... how can you "disprove" that???? You can't. It's just a definition! And that is exactly what "God" is. A definition of something. You can't disprove a definition of something. "God" is the human definition of "that which makes everything happen". Does everything happen? Yes. And we define that which makes everything happen as "God". You simply can't disprove that, because it's just a definition. Do you understand? Aw, I'm quite familiar with "the god of the gaps" (flawed)argument. MaybeTrollingUAgain |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74339157 United States 10/21/2019 03:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The fact that anything exists means that God exists. Quoting: Reilly 78097796 A grand consciousness. Consciousness = structure/order/framework Nothing would exist without those things. And the ENTIRE universe is BUILT on those things. And thus.... The entire infinite universe is conscious. <3 And that infinite universe is the consciousness of God. We are part of that infinite universe, and we are conscious.... Universe is finite The Universe is finite but 'potentially' Infinite because God is Infinite and the Universe will continue to grow forever but will never become truly Infinite - it will always be Potentially Infinite... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72946100 United States 10/21/2019 03:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Think of it this way guys.... Quoting: Reilly 78097796 If we are conscious, right? You and me. All of us.... And each of us are merely a part of the universe, right? Then wouldn't that mean that the universe is conscious also?... Because given that we are parts of the universe, and we are consciousness..... then the universe is literally MADE of consciousness. ? If us conscious beings are a mere *component* of the Universe, right?......... Then that would in inherently mean that the Universe is conscious. Simply given that us conscious being are a part of it? *Simply given that us conscious beings are a part of it? So... If the larger Universe is COMPRISED of consciousness (us)..... Then wouldn't that inherently mean that the larger Universe is conscious?... Given that we make up the universe? We are a part of the Universe. You are a part of the universe. As a part, you are also the whole experiencing yourself as a part. There is only one thing in the universe. Experiencing itself in every way possible by the illusion of seperation. You and I seem like different people, and we are from each of our unique perspectives. We are also however, made of the particles created when stars go supernova. So in that sense we are the same thing. Made of the same stuff. In the "beginning" (which is a nonsensical concept at the scale we are talking) the ONE couldn't experience anything. Because it was all there was. It couldn't admire itself or anything because there was nothing to compare to anything else. Just the One. So it split, and in doing that there was now "this", "that", and the space between. By splitting there was now two experiences that could each compare, admire, contrast, and criticize, admire etc. each other. They seemed like two different things, and had two different experiences, or perspectives. But they were both the original ONE. Just agreeing to have the illusion of seperation to enjoy the EXPERIENCE. To gain knowledge and perspective by having the experience of seperation, but it's just an illusion. The two split, and the four split, and it's been going on for however long it has. Be kind to your neighbor, because it IS you, you've only forgotten. You have to forget temporarily to continue to learn and expand (as the universe is, ever faster and faster). The illusion of seperation might seem like a curse or a trick, but it is the only way to have the most expansive experience and appreciate (or not) as much as is possible. I could go on, but I think that is enough to get you started. We thank you. |
Theoferrum User ID: 74339157 United States 10/21/2019 03:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74339157 United States 10/21/2019 03:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78047891 United States 10/21/2019 03:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You exist bound in a little world of imagination and ideas that are not even yours. Such imagination of little wrathful, vengeful gods and scary demons frames you into a very limited field of comprehension, devoid of Self-Actualization. xtianity is the antithesis of Self-Realization |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77996502 Netherlands 10/21/2019 03:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78087995 United Kingdom 10/21/2019 03:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Two worth watching. The Emergent Universe [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Science Has Found Proof of the Existence of God! [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] The newest, The Emergent Universe, is seriously compelling - full of uptodate science and the world's leading physicists. The second video is perhaps easier on the brain. You'll have to watch The Emergent Universe a couple of times to let it all sink in. The conclusions are clear: there MUST be a extra-universal intelligence (which we can only apprehend as God). And guess what? The science fits with biblical descriptions as far as they are articulated. Some 68% of Nobel prize winners in the sciences disclose some sort of belief in God. |
Reilly User ID: 78097796 United States 10/21/2019 03:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77727632 10/21/2019 03:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74339157 United States 10/21/2019 03:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes it is because the Universe can not create itself out of nothing. It had to have had a Creator. Predynastic Egypt called Him Heh and He gave His Name to the fifth letter of the Hebrew Alphabet. He is pictured standing between, and holding, two Spear Leaves which represent Eternity Past and Future... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74339157 United States 10/21/2019 03:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not necessarily. What if the infinite universe (or multiverse as they call the concept now) always existed, and always will exist? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78016545 It was here before us, with us (conception), and will exist after the particles that we consist of are dispersed (our deaths). You are dating yourself. The Multi Universe died an ugly death about 30 years ago - they have now repackaged it and tried to sell it to smucks like you under the "Bubble Universe" Theory but it still gets its ass run over by the first two LAWS of Thermodynamics - the Universe can not be infinitely old or it would have burned out by now... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77992195 United States 10/21/2019 03:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74339157 United States 10/21/2019 03:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
SeveNation User ID: 77827043 United States 10/21/2019 03:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | #2 How did that first form become living? ( It is violating law of Biogenesis ) #3 A fixed set of information well not increase by distorting that information. Mutation will never increase info only decrease and weaken it. |
SeveNation User ID: 77827043 United States 10/21/2019 04:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
MaybeTrollingUAgain User ID: 76840347 Brazil 10/21/2019 04:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | #1 What is assembeling the first life form? ( It is violating the Law of Entropy, things go to chaos/disorder they don't self assemble ) Quoting: SeveNation 77827043 #2 How did that first form become living? ( It is violating law of Biogenesis ) #3 A fixed set of information well not increase by distorting that information. Mutation will never increase info only decrease and weaken it. #1 - It does not. What you refer as "law of entropy" is actually the 2nd law of thermodynamics, which is measured in a closed system, which is not the case of our planet. Energy from the sun comes in ALL THE TIME. #2 - What you refer to as "first form" is studied in another field of science called Abiogenesis(the "A" here makes all the difference). #3 - Replicated DNA mutates, that's a very well known fact. So yes, information does change along time. You're just vomiting the very same old pulpit ignorant arguments. Just another fanatic without a clue and desperate to confirm faith. By definition, you shouldn't make use of anything that you disagree with(including evolution), thus, no medication for you, go pray your cancer away instead. MaybeTrollingUAgain |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77439155 Czechia 10/21/2019 04:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 9734441 Turkey 10/21/2019 04:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |