Shocking Video Update 3: Massive NASA UFO videos Leak !! | |
Astroshill Senior Forum Moderator 11/14/2019 07:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Btw, 230km long spaceship is nothing if you just look at Quoting: HeartSutra The planet sized motherships near the sun There aren't any such motherships. If you are referring to coronal cavities, I have photographed those as well during a total eclipse and they are not spaceships. You seem to deny everything, are you a govt shill? Activities of giant UFOs around the sun are so common that it's undeniable, i can post a lot of youtube clips from different sources and your still gonna say fake. . Wrong, it is very deniable. I'm sure you can post a lot of YouTube videos of coronal cavities and filament channels. It's a natural phenomenon. |
HeartSutra (OP) User ID: 78162897 Taiwan 11/14/2019 12:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Update 3 : SHOCKING VIDEO !! see FIRST VIDEO IN FIRST POST .. Last Edited by HeartSutra on 11/14/2019 12:29 PM |
HeartSutra (OP) User ID: 78162897 Taiwan 11/14/2019 12:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Btw, 230km long spaceship is nothing if you just look at Quoting: HeartSutra The planet sized motherships near the sun There aren't any such motherships. If you are referring to coronal cavities, I have photographed those as well during a total eclipse and they are not spaceships. You seem to deny everything, are you a govt shill? Activities of giant UFOs around the sun are so common that it's undeniable, i can post a lot of youtube clips from different sources and your still gonna say fake. . Wrong, it is very deniable. I'm sure you can post a lot of YouTube videos of coronal cavities and filament channels. It's a natural phenomenon. Go see for yourself.. Update 3 : SHOCKING VIDEO !! Go See FIRST VIDEO IN FIRST POST .. |
Astroshill Senior Forum Moderator 11/14/2019 12:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Astroshill There aren't any such motherships. If you are referring to coronal cavities, I have photographed those as well during a total eclipse and they are not spaceships. You seem to deny everything, are you a govt shill? Activities of giant UFOs around the sun are so common that it's undeniable, i can post a lot of youtube clips from different sources and your still gonna say fake. . Wrong, it is very deniable. I'm sure you can post a lot of YouTube videos of coronal cavities and filament channels. It's a natural phenomenon. Go see for yourself.. Update 3 : SHOCKING VIDEO !! Go See FIRST VIDEO IN FIRST POST .. I see more obvious CGI hoaxes from turdphase, known UFO hoaxers. They are damaging to the credibility of UFO believers and anyone who reports anything unusual. I really wish they'd fuck off. |
HeartSutra (OP) User ID: 78162897 Taiwan 11/14/2019 12:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Dose this seem fake to you ? Are you F...ing B.... ? . Last Edited by HeartSutra on 11/14/2019 12:43 PM |
Click Here Again User ID: 77160280 United States 11/14/2019 12:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Damn. Idk what to think of that. I have always wondered something though. Why do these craft always seem to float/rotate aimlessly? Were it not for the unidentifiable shapes, I'd assume it was simply space junk. Idk... If it is fake, it's freaking awesome & they're underpaid & underappreciated. |
Foreverwatching User ID: 70854901 United States 11/14/2019 01:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
HeartSutra (OP) User ID: 78162897 Taiwan 11/14/2019 01:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Foreverwatching User ID: 75679753 United States 11/14/2019 01:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That is the most convincing footage I’ve ever seen. Wow. This video needs to be pinned Quoting: Foreverwatching Expect more coming up, it's going to be fun.. . You should post this video by itself. It is jaw dropping. I’m wondering if this is the next phase of disclosure. Foreverwatching |
Astroshill Senior Forum Moderator 11/14/2019 02:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes, very fake. CGI models over static images or video panning around to give the illusion of motion, random out of focus and film grain layers added, and a separate element of a window frame added to give the illusion of reality. This trick isn't new. It's basic after effects and 3d models. Do you realize that in order for the perspective of Saturn's rings to change as much as they do at 9-15 seconds in the video that the spacecraft would need to be traveling FAR above Saturnian escape velocity? In fact I bet it would even have to be well above solar escape velocity. This is how much shift a real spacecraft orbiting Saturn, Cassini, saw in 3 days. Days. Not seconds, minutes or even hours: [link to solarsystem.nasa.gov (secure)] [link to solarsystem.nasa.gov (secure)] It's not plausible even on the face of it, and I bet you anything it was ripped off of an existing time lapse from the Cassini mission. I'm betting that to you, none of this matters, you don't care whether it's plausible, you so badly want to believe it that you'll handwave away any amount of ridiculousness by saying "secret tech, secret tech" no matter how much of physics it breaks. What is not only plausible but quite obvious is that they took images like these that were taken by Cassini and transmitted back to earth over days of time and made a short time lapse out of it a few seconds long which portrays the motion of the spacecraft relative to Saturn and used that as their background plate. The raw images are freely available: [link to solarsystem.nasa.gov (secure)] Looks like they used images far from the Saturnian equinox for that series, based on the ring shadow on the planet, probably from early in the mission circa 2004. |
Astroshill Senior Forum Moderator 11/14/2019 02:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No I don't. I already proved it's fake. ... Quoting: Astroshill Go fuck yourself. Stop calling me out you pathetic sacks of shit. This is bullshit. You don't see stars in high magnification video tracking ISS like that. I've been filming ISS for 15 years with my telescope. I change the exposure on ISS throughout that video. When the habitat sections start to merge together with the radiators from being overexposed, the solar array are still not over exposed. Different sections of the station have different reflectivity, not like the fake video where it's homogenous. And even when the habitat sections are completely over exposed and bleeding together in my video you still can't see a single background star. The camera is perfectly capable of seeing stars in that telescope, but ISS itself is way too bright. A night vision eyepiece or camera wouldn't help that. If cranked up enough to show background stars, ISS would not be a discernable shape, it would be one large over exposed ball of light. Stop promoting a proven hoaxer. You are damaging the credibility of anyone who reports a UFO. astronut is one of the most biased sources on glp and you are falling for your confirmation bias. Bahahaha! Says the idiot who is falling for a blatant hoax channel. You don't even know what confirmation bias is, which is why you keep ignoring all the evidence that this shit is from a hoaxer. You are literally engaging in confirmation bias yourself. |
Click Here Again User ID: 77160280 United States 11/14/2019 02:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes, very fake. CGI models over static images or video panning around to give the illusion of motion, random out of focus and film grain layers added, and a separate element of a window frame added to give the illusion of reality. This trick isn't new. It's basic after effects and 3d models. Do you realize that in order for the perspective of Saturn's rings to change as much as they do at 9-15 seconds in the video that the spacecraft would need to be traveling FAR above Saturnian escape velocity? In fact I bet it would even have to be well above solar escape velocity. This is how much shift a real spacecraft orbiting Saturn, Cassini, saw in 3 days. Days. Not seconds, minutes or even hours: [link to solarsystem.nasa.gov (secure)] [link to solarsystem.nasa.gov (secure)] It's not plausible even on the face of it, and I bet you anything it was ripped off of an existing time lapse from the Cassini mission. I'm betting that to you, none of this matters, you don't care whether it's plausible, you so badly want to believe it that you'll handwave away any amount of ridiculousness by saying "secret tech, secret tech" no matter how much of physics it breaks. What is not only plausible but quite obvious is that they took images like these that were taken by Cassini and transmitted back to earth over days of time and made a short time lapse out of it a few seconds long which portrays the motion of the spacecraft relative to Saturn and used that as their background plate. The raw images are freely available: [link to solarsystem.nasa.gov (secure)] Looks like they used images far from the Saturnian equinox for that series, based on the ring shadow on the planet, probably from early in the mission circa 2004. Bahaha, they even repeated the same effects shot twice that I've seen so far. 9 seconds and 2:44 are the same shot! Whoops, editing mistake there geniuses, and none of you caught it. Darn. This is why I like you Astro. As much as I wanted that one to be authentic, logic overrides desire. Hey I was wondering if you could clear something up for me. What ARE the objects? Toy models? Completely CGI? |
Foreverwatching User ID: 75679753 United States 11/14/2019 02:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The shots of Saturn look fake and almost dramatized but many of the other shots look real. It’s hard to really get excited about things when Misinformation could so easily be added to some real content and then everything is considered fake. I don’t know Foreverwatching |
Astroshill Senior Forum Moderator 11/14/2019 03:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes, very fake. CGI models over static images or video panning around to give the illusion of motion, random out of focus and film grain layers added, and a separate element of a window frame added to give the illusion of reality. This trick isn't new. It's basic after effects and 3d models. Do you realize that in order for the perspective of Saturn's rings to change as much as they do at 9-15 seconds in the video that the spacecraft would need to be traveling FAR above Saturnian escape velocity? In fact I bet it would even have to be well above solar escape velocity. This is how much shift a real spacecraft orbiting Saturn, Cassini, saw in 3 days. Days. Not seconds, minutes or even hours: [link to solarsystem.nasa.gov (secure)] [link to solarsystem.nasa.gov (secure)] It's not plausible even on the face of it, and I bet you anything it was ripped off of an existing time lapse from the Cassini mission. I'm betting that to you, none of this matters, you don't care whether it's plausible, you so badly want to believe it that you'll handwave away any amount of ridiculousness by saying "secret tech, secret tech" no matter how much of physics it breaks. What is not only plausible but quite obvious is that they took images like these that were taken by Cassini and transmitted back to earth over days of time and made a short time lapse out of it a few seconds long which portrays the motion of the spacecraft relative to Saturn and used that as their background plate. The raw images are freely available: [link to solarsystem.nasa.gov (secure)] Looks like they used images far from the Saturnian equinox for that series, based on the ring shadow on the planet, probably from early in the mission circa 2004. Bahaha, they even repeated the same effects shot twice that I've seen so far. 9 seconds and 2:44 are the same shot! Whoops, editing mistake there geniuses, and none of you caught it. Darn. This is why I like you Astro. As much as I wanted that one to be authentic, logic overrides desire. Hey I was wondering if you could clear something up for me. What ARE the objects? Toy models? Completely CGI? Looks like complete CGI to me, they are noticeably sharper than the rest of the scene. |
Click Here Again User ID: 77160280 United States 11/14/2019 03:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Astroshill Yes, very fake. CGI models over static images or video panning around to give the illusion of motion, random out of focus and film grain layers added, and a separate element of a window frame added to give the illusion of reality. This trick isn't new. It's basic after effects and 3d models. Do you realize that in order for the perspective of Saturn's rings to change as much as they do at 9-15 seconds in the video that the spacecraft would need to be traveling FAR above Saturnian escape velocity? In fact I bet it would even have to be well above solar escape velocity. This is how much shift a real spacecraft orbiting Saturn, Cassini, saw in 3 days. Days. Not seconds, minutes or even hours: [link to solarsystem.nasa.gov (secure)] [link to solarsystem.nasa.gov (secure)] It's not plausible even on the face of it, and I bet you anything it was ripped off of an existing time lapse from the Cassini mission. I'm betting that to you, none of this matters, you don't care whether it's plausible, you so badly want to believe it that you'll handwave away any amount of ridiculousness by saying "secret tech, secret tech" no matter how much of physics it breaks. What is not only plausible but quite obvious is that they took images like these that were taken by Cassini and transmitted back to earth over days of time and made a short time lapse out of it a few seconds long which portrays the motion of the spacecraft relative to Saturn and used that as their background plate. The raw images are freely available: [link to solarsystem.nasa.gov (secure)] Looks like they used images far from the Saturnian equinox for that series, based on the ring shadow on the planet, probably from early in the mission circa 2004. Bahaha, they even repeated the same effects shot twice that I've seen so far. 9 seconds and 2:44 are the same shot! Whoops, editing mistake there geniuses, and none of you caught it. Darn. This is why I like you Astro. As much as I wanted that one to be authentic, logic overrides desire. Hey I was wondering if you could clear something up for me. What ARE the objects? Toy models? Completely CGI? Looks like complete CGI to me, they are noticeably sharper than the rest of the scene. Awesome thank you. I'm going to snag some frames & check them out in Photoshop & see if I notice anything. I'll update if I see anything worth mentioning. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 50542952 United States 11/14/2019 03:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78075976 United States 11/14/2019 04:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Updated: 20 More Clips: [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] And some more: [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] somebody pin this! . hahahahha trudphase |
HeartSutra (OP) User ID: 78162897 Taiwan 11/14/2019 06:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Talk is cheap, try making one video even remotely like these. You can try to debunk this all you can but where's your proof? Just because it can be faked doen't nesessarily mean it's a fake, doubters will debunk nasa videos too. And use your common sense, nobody with this kind of skill, would spend so much time making fake videos so real that he could be making millions in hollywood. In fact, if fake, then the videos are way above hollywood standard. . |
HeartSutra (OP) User ID: 78162897 Taiwan 11/14/2019 06:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Talk is cheap, try making one video even remotely like these. You can try to debunk this all you can but where's your proof ? Just because it can be faked doen't nesessarily mean it's a fake, doubters will debunk nasa videos too. btw, you can't use our current knowledge to debunk alien technology, what you think impossible is nothing to them. you are making logical mistakes. And use your common sense, nobody with this kind of skill, would spend so much time making fake videos so real that he could be making millions in hollywood. In fact, if fake, then the videos are way above hollywood standard. . Last Edited by HeartSutra on 11/14/2019 06:26 PM |
Astroshill Senior Forum Moderator 11/14/2019 06:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Astroshill Senior Forum Moderator 11/14/2019 06:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Talk is cheap, try making one video even remotely like these. Quoting: HeartSutra Just because it can be faked doen't nesessarily mean it's a fake, doubters will debunk nasa videos too. which is it? Do you want me to produce more of these videos to ram down your throat or do you want to immediately turn around and talk out of both sides of your ass and say that you will ignore any such videos because you refuse to accept that it's fake even if it can be fake. you won't even accept the possibility that it's fake even if I produce those videos myself, you just admitted it. You can't make a single post without contradicting yourself. And yes it matters that the video completely breaks physics. it's called implausibility. Get it through your head. You don't get to hand wave to magical technology without proof. Especially when it is easier to explain it by simply pointing out that they stole images from the cassini spacecraft. I linked you to those images. it's a lot easier to come to the conclusion that they simply fake to the video by using a time lapse than the idea that they filmed it from a human spacecraft that is traveling above galactic escape velocity swinging by Saturn. You make UFO believers look like idiots. I hate people like you. You damage the community with your ridiculous unsupported claims. |
Astroshill Senior Forum Moderator 11/14/2019 06:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76983957 United Kingdom 11/14/2019 07:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The ones filmed gliding by the ISS and various STS are known by certain people within NASA as 'Aquapulses' - I know they actually have a more scientific name, which I am not aware of (I know it was something long beginning with 'S' - I saw it written down), but Aquapulses is they're generally referred to internally. They are enormous high-altitude, intelligent and sentient, biological entities that drift in and out of our oceans, mostly the Pacific, and mostly at night - for whatever reason. They descend periodically from our low orbit into our oceans - it's not yet fully understood for what purpose, but it's thought likely it's to feed. They then ascend back into low-orbit before sunrise, and can do so at fairly high-speed. Think high-altitude jellyfish. They are highly translucent, and will glisten if sunlight catches them, which is why they're colloquially termed internally as 'Aquapulses', plus as ever, the scientific name is something crazy long. There's been a small team within NASA observing and monitoring these things for the best part of nearly 40 years now, they were discovered on a very early STS mission, and were known to follow the orbiters at a close distance with great curiosity, and yes public feeds were cut multiple times when these entities got a little too close. At least three STS mission were focussed almost exclusively on the observation and interaction with these entities under the guise of another assignment, where two-way communications were conducted. And many many more missions had undocumented encounters, observations, tests / experiments in relation to these entities. These entities still remain in our low-orbit to my knowledge, but it's understood within NASA, with absolute clarity from excercises conducted, that their origin is without doubt not of our world. Unfortunately, I can't go into any further specifics. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76983957 United Kingdom 11/14/2019 07:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The ones filmed gliding by the ISS and various STS are known by certain people within NASA as 'Aquapulses' - I know they actually have a more scientific name, which I am not aware of (I know it was something long beginning with 'S' - I saw it written down), but Aquapulses is they're generally referred to internally. They are enormous high-altitude, intelligent and sentient, biological entities that drift in and out of our oceans, mostly the Pacific, and mostly at night - for whatever reason. They descend periodically from our low orbit into our oceans - it's not yet fully understood for what purpose, but it's thought likely it's to feed. They then ascend back into low-orbit before sunrise, and can do so at fairly high-speed. Think high-altitude jellyfish. They are highly translucent, and will glisten if sunlight catches them, which is why they're colloquially termed internally as 'Aquapulses', plus as ever, the scientific name is something crazy long. There's been a small team within NASA observing and monitoring these things for the best part of nearly 40 years now, they were discovered on a very early STS mission, and were known to follow the orbiters at a close distance with great curiosity, and yes public feeds were cut multiple times when these entities got a little too close. At least three STS mission were focussed almost exclusively on the observation and interaction with these entities under the guise of another assignment, where two-way communications were conducted. And many many more missions had undocumented encounters, observations, tests / experiments in relation to these entities. These entities still remain in our low-orbit to my knowledge, but it's understood within NASA, with absolute clarity from excercises conducted, that their origin is without doubt not of our world. Unfortunately, I can't go into any further specifics. |
HeartSutra (OP) User ID: 78162897 Taiwan 11/14/2019 07:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Doubters will always doubt, does anti-gravity techologies defy the laws of physics to you ? However the first 20 sec may look dubious, the planet does not move when the camera/window shakes, could be a fake window moving. Or is he sitting on a stabilized seat? could well be.. just wait and see, more videos will come out, I'm going to enjoy it. This could be prelude to great revelation. And some people will have to stop being so anal. . Last Edited by HeartSutra on 11/14/2019 09:13 PM |
Pelledan User ID: 32751542 United States 11/14/2019 07:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Updated: 20 More Clips: [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] And some more: [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] somebody pin this! . & pin attempt Smithenhouser, The Living Librarian |
HeartSutra (OP) User ID: 78162897 Taiwan 11/14/2019 08:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This could well be a human, as a guest, inside an alien spacecraft filming the videos, i don't believe the us govt owns techolohies so advanced, space force is too far fatched. Cooperations with aliens is the most likely scenario. However the first 20 sec may look dubious, the planet does not move when the camera/window shakes, could be a fake window moving. Or is he sitting on a stabilized seat? could well be.. . Last Edited by HeartSutra on 11/14/2019 09:08 PM |
the path User ID: 78161952 Indonesia 11/15/2019 02:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This could well be a human, as a guest, inside an alien spacecraft filming the videos, Quoting: HeartSutra i don't believe the us govt owns techolohies so advanced, space force is too far fatched. Cooperations with aliens is the most likely scenario. However the first 20 sec may look dubious, the planet does not move when the camera/window shakes, could be a fake window moving. Or is he sitting on a stabilized seat? could well be.. . good thinking whether it is fake or not at least trying to think the possibility Last Edited by the path on 11/15/2019 03:05 AM blue is violet, 4 7 is still 7 4 too Gold(69) Silver(47) bridge Green Need lots of rain (not hot/cold) Cancer (also 47) Cygnus (also Swan) License for Celestial Navi the cross of 69 and 47 produce the 13, 6+7 or 9+4 |
Astroshill Senior Forum Moderator 11/15/2019 07:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76954307 United Kingdom 11/15/2019 08:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |