Oh Ohhh Sci-Fy Cult of Evolution; Abiogenesis, dirt turns into living cells? Lets skip over amino acids, proteins, and explain lipids shall we?

Ohh for fucks sake GET A LIFE, SIR!!! Don't you have anything better to do than spew your crybaby, obsessive, mindless RAGE over a scientific subject about which you know nothing???

You're a psychotic abomination, a despicable little urinal cake in a bus station men's room! Please, you don't have the cognitive capacity to understand the biological laws of evolution, so please leave this subject alone if it enrages you so. See, I'm being kind here; I'm not calling you the diarrheal-headed, crab-crawling horse's ass that I'm sure other people call you. I'm not going to call you the baby-tantrum, insectile, odious, gamma-ray-emitting, aborted goblin-thing other people call you because I'm simply too nice and charitable.

But if you would, sir, PLEASE stop spamming this site with your enraged baby tantrums over evolution and your desire to have a necro relationship with Charles Darwin, it would be much appreciated.

A magnificently emotionally/intellectually/maturely/conceived/articulated expression of scientific defense of the theory of abiogenenis. Mr Spock might not agree, neither would the Ferangee.


Last Edited by DGN on 11/14/2019 11:32 PM

Though scientifically lacking your participation is appreciated.

I'm not watching your retarded video.

What exactly is your psuedoscience claim about lipids?

Well let's just address your title them. First off abiogenesis is a hypothesis with some good evidence, but has not been proven or disproven empirically yet. Abiogenesis has nothing to do with evolution. Evolution does NOT address the origin of life and never has.

Lipids require life to even exist, so really has nothing to do with evolution or abiogenesis either. Amino acids and protiens are also radically different. So any comparison of the is idiotic at best.

If not deliberately intelligently designed and assembled what accounts for their existence and function?

Last Edited by DGN on 11/15/2019 07:08 PM

Of lipids? You already have to have life before you have lipids. It's honestly just a fancy name for an energy storing biomolecule. Which even basic elements can do. No need for intelligent design. Natural progression in any organism for energy storing. Some single celled organism have no lipids at all and use non biological molecules for energy storing.

"Natural progression", explain this. Left to random chance everything naturally decomposes back to dirt, don't you know this?

Last Edited by DGN on 11/15/2019 07:12 PM

Lipids don't form without complex life. They don't just randomly occur then degrade. Single cell organisms without lipids came first. Abiogenesis has nothing to do with lipids or evolution. Relating the two is idiotic and not how the science works.

5 stars for real science!

Science provides zero mechanism in nature accounting for complex living cells precision form and function, beautiful fit and finish. The video well proved turning dirt into living cells requires a Master scientist with bio-molecular intelligence far beyond man's ability to imitate even with living models to copy. Denying discoveries of real science is intellectual contempt for superior intelligence.


Last Edited by DGN on 11/15/2019 07:40 PM

Okay but that is abiogenesis and has nothing to do with lipids or evolution. As I said long before, it is only a hypothesis (1 of over 20 to be honest) and has some good evidence, but have not been proven.

And in reference to the bold part, we have many theorized and proven mechanisms.

It has irrefutable evidence complexity requires deliberate design/assembly and operation.Like the illustration of the watch, even with the advantage of all the gears per-existing in precision form by pure random accident, and all being in a jar at the same time, shaking the jar forever would never result in them assembling into precision function. Just the opposite would happen they would all wear down to dust like everything else without exception.

Last Edited by DGN on 11/15/2019 07:57 PM

No it's not. The first water clock in japan was believed to have been discovered by accident according to japanese myths. And they have proven that these molecules do bond in energized water among other mechanism. Sorry to refute you at every turn, but you need to educate yourself. Youtube isn't good for that.

If a Japanese myth proves the bio-sphere in all it's precision form and function, beautiful fit and finish is NOT deliberately intelligently designed/assembled and operated for man's enjoyment what does, Stanley Miller?

Last Edited by DGN on 11/15/2019 08:29 PM

yeah nah, my sister had liposuction and yeah, she is still a fat pig

so abigenisis is like oh, the eholim brooding over the fucking void...




human monkey


LOVE YOUR CREATORS

do not try to comprehend


serve

pay

rinse

repeat

Give us a single piece of evidence that it was 'deliberately intelligently designed/assembled and operated for man's enjoyment.' You're claiming it was, so the burden of proof is on you.

Darwins evolution is a fraud on Gods creation. We do evolve within our own DNAs limitations. However we do not grow wings because we want to fly.

Start with this, did these atoms spontaneously arise from the earth into this precision form and function or is it deliberately intelligently designed? If you can't get it no point confusing you further.

Ok did you get it?


Last Edited by DGN on 11/22/2019 07:42 PM

Evolution theory has never -at any point- suggested that we grow wings because we want to fly. Things don't evolve because they 'want to'.

You should actually understand evolution theory before you form an opinion on it.

I should understand debunk-able theories?

So birds designed and assembled their own wings because they wanted to fly or, they just lucked out with a free-by?

Don't change the subject, don't ask me questions, don't try and shift the burden of proof. The burden of proof is on you.

Give us a single piece of evidence for your claim.

Yes, you must understand something in order to debunk it. But you can't debunk it. If you could, you'd be famous. You'd get a Nobel prize.

Based on Darwin we came from mud? So Yes. A bird chose to have wings by that thinking process.

That`s actually what God made Adam from and woman was made from his rib.

But apparently this is more believable for some.

Yes, mud pies spontaneously forming into highly complex cells and coming alive because they got shocked by a million volts of lightening.... seems to be lacking scientific explanation, except for the Sci-Fy Cult of Evolution.

I direct your interested eyes to Michael Behe and the impossibly complexity of the flagellum. And I am NOT a bible thumper. I'm more believing that ETs bred some apes and made humans. Might explain the evo gaps? But ultimately something vast created it all. Sorry dude. We are all apart of this incredible creation by something, or things.





Lol.

Last Edited by Cebeij on 11/22/2019 10:08 PM