I am a British Intelligence Officer, Ask Me What You Like. | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 276383 United Kingdom 08/02/2007 06:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.holyconservancy.org] Quoting: Lazarus 276019Edward at 22, in 1916 and 2004 See? I'm telling the truth. Well you will be happy to know that i am a Royalist. you will be not happy I am self governing, I am sovereign over my bodies. And I do not consent to the jurisdiction or authority of any King, Queen, or any government, any government political subdivisions and all their agencies and I am not under lawful and/or moral obligation to any of these entities. Still want to know who Kill Diana...? |Lazarus| |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 276389 United States 08/02/2007 06:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I enjoy these forums and of course im thicked skin, like water off a ducks back. It is exactly how you have been conditioned to think, to act, with impunity. There is going to be an event, one that will close a lot of mouths. One that will change the New World forever. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 276383Yeah, it'll close a lot of mouths alright -- permanently. They want to reduce the middle class, educated population. We know this already. We who want to carry on must pray for Deliverance. EEWC |
Lazarus User ID: 276019 Canada 08/02/2007 07:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.holyconservancy.org] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 276383Edward at 22, in 1916 and 2004 See? I'm telling the truth. Well you will be happy to know that i am a Royalist. you will be not happy I am self governing, I am sovereign over my bodies. And I do not consent to the jurisdiction or authority of any King, Queen, or any government, any government political subdivisions and all their agencies and I am not under lawful and/or moral obligation to any of these entities. Still want to know who Kill Diana...? |Lazarus| Your consent is irrelevant. You will sell your soul for them one day. :o) sorry friend know that all the old angels, prophets, and notables of yore are now back in body, including the opposition. and What no one could have ever known, unless you can access the Akashic or WAS THERE, was that Diana was MURDERED BY HER OWN SON, WHO STRANGLED HER, WHILE HAVING SEX WITH HER. see The beast must kill both his parents in the Highest (read sickest) of the incubus rituals - the sex murder of your parents. Diana was murdered, after the arranged accident, by WIlliam, her son. As he penetrated her vagina. Sorry...! So Proceed my friend You always have such meaningful and important information to share with US. |Lazarus| |
Channing User ID: 95473 Germany 08/02/2007 07:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Will you come back to this forum after August/September passes without any spectacular event to explain why? |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 276383 United Kingdom 08/02/2007 07:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Will you come back to this forum after August/September passes without any spectacular event to explain why? Quoting: ChanningYes, i will be here. I am not here warning of an incident. The World has changed and is still changing, we have not come to a halt yet, things thicken up thick and fast. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 276383 United Kingdom 08/02/2007 07:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Shechaiyah User ID: 276389 United States 08/02/2007 07:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Whoa. I'm not going there. To remain with the Covenant is sufficient by me -- And to narrate what I can verify. What I know is the 1689 LAW. And it states a King or Queen Cannot marry a Papist/Catholic due to conflict of interest. My father did NOT marry a Catholic; and he was FORCED to abdicate and live in penury the rest of his life. Charles has married a Catholic woman (whose two children are also Catholic) who can be blackmailed by the Church to wrest compliance out of her husband -- the precise conflict of interest that the Law was written to avoid. But he expects to be King? I don't think so. There are enough citizens of England who will not permit him to flaunt the Law and flaunt Kingly vows to "defend the Faith" by his embracing Occultist practices and Pagan affiliations. It's just not right, what's going on there. My father must be spinning in his grave, who never lied, who never bilked the bank, who always gave his all. Shechaiyah |
Shechaiyah User ID: 276389 United States 08/02/2007 07:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Whoa. I'm not going there. To remain with the Covenant is sufficient by me -- And to narrate what I can verify. What I know is the 1689 LAW. And it states a King or Queen Cannot marry a Papist/Catholic due to conflict of interest. My father did NOT marry a Catholic; and he was FORCED to abdicate and live in penury the rest of his life. Charles has married a Catholic woman (whose two children are also Catholic) who can be blackmailed by the Church to wrest compliance out of her husband -- the precise conflict of interest that the Law was written to avoid. But he expects to be King? I don't think so. There are enough citizens of England who will not permit him to flaunt the Law and flaunt Kingly vows to "defend the Faith" by his embracing Occultist practices and Pagan affiliations. It's just not right, what's going on there. My father must be spinning in his grave, who never lied, who never bilked the bank, who always gave his all. Shechaiyah |
Lazarus User ID: 276019 Canada 08/02/2007 07:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Lazarus,To rise once is a Miracle. Twice you need a good Proxy. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 276383No need of Proxy Officer Just a good Spoffer ;o) remember it, the Etheric WEB RECORDS ALL EVENTS THAT HAPPEN TO IT. F O R E V E R. Anyway ...! |Lazarus| |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 276383 United Kingdom 08/02/2007 07:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Whoa. Quoting: Shechaiyah 276389I'm not going there. To remain with the Covenant is sufficient by me -- And to narrate what I can verify. What I know is the 1689 LAW. And it states a King or Queen Cannot marry a Papist/Catholic due to conflict of interest. My father did NOT marry a Catholic; and he was FORCED to abdicate and live in penury the rest of his life. Charles has married a Catholic woman (whose two children are also Catholic) who can be blackmailed by the Church to wrest compliance out of her husband -- the precise conflict of interest that the Law was written to avoid. But he expects to be King? I don't think so. There are enough citizens of England who will not permit him to flaunt the Law and flaunt Kingly vows to "defend the Faith" by his embracing Occultist practices and Pagan affiliations. It's just not right, what's going on there. My father must be spinning in his grave, who never lied, who never bilked the bank, who always gave his all. Shechaiyah Your Father Sir, if that is who you really are, which i doubt, was a homosexual and Weak. Sometimes the line throws out wondrous miracles of leaders, but every now and again it throws out a rubber duck. |
Shechaiyah User ID: 276389 United States 08/02/2007 07:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | As a child he suffered from failure to thrive because his nanny and father beat him regularly. At the age of 19 he was about 5'4" being completely undernourished. He didn't reach full height (5'7") until he was 25. He parents didn't allow him to move into his own place until he was THIRTY-SIX YEARS OF AGE! He resisted the Fascist Imperialism of George V. He refused to join the Round Table, the CFR, the Knights of Malta. He had no part in the Balfour Declaration that was intended to ship all Jews out of England and into Palestine. He refused to marry the ditsy women his Father brought around, the Italian Princess of Mussolini's or a middle class fishwife-type like someone else who will remain nameless :: double-dealing, two-faced manipulator. He traveled all over the world for 22 years in his father's name and gave nothing but Honor to the Kingdom all those years. He was a gifted public speaker and negotiator. He was known to keep the company of married woman (because marriage was impossible) from about the age of 22 until he was finally "fixed up" with Wallace, at about the age of 38, by one of his married "friends." I forget her name. Where you get this homosexual reputation is quite simply amazing; because there is nothing about it in his auto-biography, nothing about it in the press. What he was known for was being a womanizer like Edward VII. And that was bad enough, in those days. I think you are making things up, officer. Clearly, you are not old enough to have known my father; neither were you ever close enough to glean the truth out of his biographers. Emily |
Shechaiyah User ID: 276389 United States 08/02/2007 07:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 276383 United Kingdom 08/02/2007 07:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Edward was weak, was he? Quoting: Shechaiyah 276389As a child he suffered from failure to thrive because his nanny and father beat him regularly. At the age of 19 he was about 5'4" being completely undernourished. He didn't reach full height (5'7") until he was 25. He parents didn't allow him to move into his own place until he was THIRTY-SIX YEARS OF AGE! He resisted the Fascist Imperialism of George V. He refused to join the Round Table, the CFR, the Knights of Malta. He had no part in the Balfour Declaration that was intended to ship all Jews out of England and into Palestine. He refused to marry the ditsy women his Father brought around, the Italian Princess of Mussolini's or a middle class fishwife-type like someone else who will remain nameless :: double-dealing, two-faced manipulator. He traveled all over the world for 22 years in his father's name and gave nothing but Honor to the Kingdom all those years. He was a gifted public speaker and negotiator. He was known to keep the company of married woman (because marriage was impossible) from about the age of 22 until he was finally "fixed up" with Wallace, at about the age of 38, by one of his married "friends." I forget her name. Where you get this homosexual reputation is quite simply amazing; because there is nothing about it in his auto-biography, nothing about it in the press. What he was known for was being a womanizer like Edward VII. And that was bad enough, in those days. I think you are making things up, officer. Clearly, you are not old enough to have known my father; neither were you ever close enough to glean the truth out of his biographers. Emily [link to www.powells.com] |
Yank User ID: 6122 United States 08/02/2007 08:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 275968 United States 08/02/2007 08:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What is your knowledge of UFO/ETs visiting the UK. Are they friendly? Should we welcome them? Are they landing soon..?!! You think they would prevent a nuclear detonation in the UK? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 276383I have read conflicting material and been privvy to only compartmentalised information. I know that some events get taken a lot more serious than would appear so. I believe most are time travelling humans from the future. I would think of them as unpredictable and with agendas. But they could stop a nuclear detonation, if they wanted to. Baloney! Humans traveling through time is impossible for the reasons of quantum physics, molecular biology and temporal physics. It cannot be done in the current human form, unless it take a very advanced genetic mutation or two for humans to travel through time in a faster-than-speed of light transition. |
Shechaiyah User ID: 276389 United States 08/02/2007 08:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It is quite apparent that all you have read is the title of this book; but you never got the point of it, except to have something to sensationalize. Edward was primarily lonely for sympatico. He had a far-flung ranging intellect that was constantly frustrated by his family's rigidity. They suffered from control-freak disorder. He struggled with his life. If that's not good enough for you, it's good enough for me. He met his royal obligations until the time came when they violated his free will. And then Baldwin saw to it, he had no choices. If you want to believe that's worse than royals today who propagate genocide, bank fraud, money-laundering and secret Satanic rituals, well, I guess you're entitled to your opinion. And I have mine. The mandate for the Throne of England has been left unsatisfied and unfulfilled for three generations. Neither George V, George VI nor Queen Elizabeth were educated to know how to lead people. They have all spoken from cue-cards, donned gaudy finery to make an appearance of leadership and followed dumbly behind whatever the State wanted and directed them to do. Last November 15th, HRM QE2 gave a speech wherein she went through a list of things her government was going to do; and they were ALL THE STRATEGIES AND DECEPTIONS OF NEW WORLD ORDER THINKING. I never once heard her bring up the topic of allowing her subjects to have an opportunity to consent to what they are going to have to endure under this rule. That is not a Sovereign. That is a lackey. |
McKracken User ID: 41594 Germany 08/02/2007 08:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | OP, for recreation purposes and as you might not be allowed to give too specific answers to temporary questions, I have one about the further distant past: Isn''t it curious, that the Star-Spangled Banner looks like a copy of the British East India Trading Company's banner? Any comment on that? |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 276383 United Kingdom 08/02/2007 08:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | OP, for recreation purposes and as you might not be allowed to give too specific answers to temporary questions, I have one about the further distant past: Quoting: McKrackenIsn''t it curious, that the Star-Spangled Banner looks like a copy of the British East India Trading Company's banner? Any comment on that? I have stated before, that independance was BS. Empirical rule. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 251319 United States 08/02/2007 08:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 276383 United Kingdom 08/02/2007 08:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Shechaiyah User ID: 276389 United States 08/02/2007 08:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Further, we have the same thought-controls in place that you have in the UK, AUS, NZ and wherever English-language media can reach. Filth. This is how NOT to establish a long-lived civilized way of living by Rule of Law, by Consensus, by Sharing and Fairness. Despicable parasitism rules. Take your system and shove it, Bloke. The Kingdom of God, validated by Jacob's Stone and the Throne of David, it is NOT! EEWC |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 276383 United Kingdom 08/02/2007 08:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So, OP. Just what are we supposed to do? Be good little sheep led to the slaughter? Quoting: Yank 6122Are you looking forward to the NWO? How do you live with the lie? Not everyones plans for the future are Evil, many groups struggling for control of reality behind the scenes. Few people can control the game of reality to close to whatever they please I suggest looking at the Rapture hoax in the US,Fatima Prophecies hoax. All reductionalism agendas. I live with not a lie, but with a future of truth and fulfilment of potential. |
Shech-- User ID: 276389 United States 08/02/2007 08:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 276383 United Kingdom 08/02/2007 08:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It does not have to be that way, you have to see through the smokescreen and be a futurist instead of dwelling in the past, times are changing, do you want to be at the front shaping that change or do you want to rebel at everything and achieve nothing? Embrace the future and do it your way. |
Shechaiyah User ID: 276389 United States 08/02/2007 08:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 276517 United States 08/02/2007 08:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 251319 United States 08/02/2007 09:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It does not have to be that way, you have to see through the smokescreen and be a futurist instead of dwelling in the past, times are changing, do you want to be at the front shaping that change or do you want to rebel at everything and achieve nothing? Embrace the future and do it your way. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 276383Ron Paul is my way, and a whole lot of other aware Americans too. we're aware of this evil bullshit, and are making a political stand now. if more shady things keep happening, it'll bring much more to light. do your masters want armed revolution in the US? this ain't gonna stop now. the snowball is rolling. now it's knocking down trees. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 276383 United Kingdom 08/02/2007 09:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here's one for you--did the Social Security Act sell the US out to England or was our "independence" merely a sham all along? Quoting: GTI dont think the values were a lie, the idea was good. I just believe the US to be an extension of the states, we are always allies now, on everything. Made me laugh about TB being GWB's lapdog, i dont think anything could be further from the truth, both are the guys in office, but long term plans and operations are already set in place. We are one and the same, but we are the heart. And, who really killed JFK?(sorry, had to ask). People who could, did. Also shady unofficial operatives , Patsies and disposable culprits, some Mob involvement. He was a threat to TPTB and he was not allowed to continue. CIA are extremely Patriotic. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 276383 United Kingdom 08/02/2007 09:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It does not have to be that way, you have to see through the smokescreen and be a futurist instead of dwelling in the past, times are changing, do you want to be at the front shaping that change or do you want to rebel at everything and achieve nothing? Embrace the future and do it your way. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 251319Ron Paul is my way, and a whole lot of other aware Americans too. we're aware of this evil bullshit, and are making a political stand now. if more shady things keep happening, it'll bring much more to light. do your masters want armed revolution in the US? this ain't gonna stop now. the snowball is rolling. now it's knocking down trees. Your right, but not with RP. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74018 United States 08/02/2007 09:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |