|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Prove or disprove FLAT EARTH
|
|
Poster Handle
|
LHP598 |
|
Post Content
|
...
the difference in distance to the Sun is only a few percent. But the amount of sunlight received due to angle of incidence varies a lot more.
opinion and speculation, prove this statement in lab experiment. Quoting: LHP598 Prove angle of incidence? Are you on crack? It is a known fact. Put a panel perpendicular to an energy source and it receives more than if at an angle. Sorry you never paid attention to the world. Ok so then that means the sun's rays aren't coming in parallel as we are told by erastothenes. That means his calculations were wrong. how does it feel to step into my traps?What trap? As the world is a globe, not all the surface is perpendicular to the sun. Or are you really that stupid? the Sun can not be as close as flatties say it is. It stays the same size throughout the day which should not happen if it were only 3000 miles up as they claim.
wrong, not only have other people shown it does change size, under a solar filter, it's easily demonstratable yourself. Get a good camera with a solar filter and take picture at different times of the year, you will see it does change size. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42079668 And I was talking about through the DAY. Please read what it written and not what you wish was written. Ok it will work during the day as well, provided you are at a high enough altitude. Still the fact remains i it changes size AT ALL during the day or year, just disproves the idea it's 93 million miles away, again.Wrong. It does not change size throughout the day. It only changes slightly throughout the year as as already mentioned elsewhere in the post, the Sun is a few percent farther or closer away. It is also known from RADAR and laser reflection as well as trigonometry that the Moon is about 240,000 miles away and the Moon moves in front of the Sun so the Sun has to be farther than that. We've also bounced RADAR off of Venus and Mercury and know that they also pass in front of the sun.
This is just quoting scientific dogma, let me know when you personally get your own radar and do the experiement yourself, its just like quoting the lunar ranging experiment without having done it yourself
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42079668 I've done the trigonometry for the Moon myself. Still worked. You just have to measure the angle in the sky at the same time as another separated observer and do the math. Still works. And the burden of proof that the RADAR doesn't work is on you. show me one trigonometry formula and your "known" values. Also the burden of proof is on me? So by your logic any woman who claims to have been raped is right by default, it's up to those who say she wasn't raped to prove it?You are either a really bad troll or just extremely stupid. The known values would be the distance between the observers and the angles measured. Since you've proved you are a troll multiple times in this post alone there is no point in digging up the information which you'll just dismiss anyway. And you proved you either don't understand the burden of proof or are still just trolling. In your example the burden of proof would be on the accuser, the woman who claims to have been raped. Just like the burden of proof is on you claiming that RADAR doesn't work.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
