Prove or disprove FLAT EARTH | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42079668 United States 11/28/2019 11:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Sure. Here you go. [link to en.m.wikipedia.org (secure)] just click formula The demonstrable effect on earth is only possible all over due to us being a globe, otherwise it would only happen in certain spots of a flat spinning disk. The disk doesn't spin neither does the earth. in short the earth's shape or rotation has nothing to do with Coriolis effect. It's likely an electromagnetic affect or force of some kind. And now we have hit the cognitive dissonance wall. Why because I refuse to accept scientific dogma? Tesla did the same thing and look what happened to him. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42079668 United States 11/28/2019 11:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42079668 Ok So then you just admitted it has nothing to do with the shape or roation of the earth and in no way proves a globe earth. It's simply a phenomenon that's caused by a force. It could still be happening on a flat earth too and be caused by electromagnetic forces. Please read what I wrote and now what you wish I wrote. I did NOT say it has nothing to do with the shape or rotation of the Earth. Quite the opposite. I said it had to do with the change of rotation speed. That mentions rotation and is dependent on the shape. Stop trying to put words in my mouth you troll. You're not very good at it. Ok so then why is Coriolis effect being used as a "proof" of a globe earth then? it's a moot point that doesn't prove anything. But if you want to sit and argue semantics go ahead. you're just a troll, aren't you? First, I didn't use it as proof. I just pointed out that you had no clue what it was. Second, as it depends on rotation and varies based on distance from the equator in a manner consistent with a globe surface it DOES point to a globe surface. And pointing out that you were unable to read what was written and tried to put words in my mouth is NOT arguing semantics, it is pointing out you're a liar and a troll. You call me a troll yet you do exactly what I said you would, you use Coriolis effect as a proof of globe earth. You just contradicted yourself about 3 times yet you call me the troll. At least i'm being consistent. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76438478 United States 11/28/2019 11:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76438478 Sure. Here you go. [link to en.m.wikipedia.org (secure)] just click formula The demonstrable effect on earth is only possible all over due to us being a globe, otherwise it would only happen in certain spots of a flat spinning disk. The disk doesn't spin neither does the earth. in short the earth's shape or rotation has nothing to do with Coriolis effect. It's likely an electromagnetic affect or force of some kind. And now we have hit the cognitive dissonance wall. Why because I refuse to accept scientific dogma? Tesla did the same thing and look what happened to him. One dude gets screwed in the AC/DC war, who's public theories were mostly disproven, and he's the martyr for your science is woowoo cause? Coriolis effect is even demostratable when you shoot your turkey, but still not good enough for you. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 64698495 United States 11/28/2019 11:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42079668 United States 11/28/2019 11:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42079668 United States 11/28/2019 11:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42079668 The disk doesn't spin neither does the earth. in short the earth's shape or rotation has nothing to do with Coriolis effect. It's likely an electromagnetic affect or force of some kind. And now we have hit the cognitive dissonance wall. Why because I refuse to accept scientific dogma? Tesla did the same thing and look what happened to him. One dude gets screwed in the AC/DC war, who's public theories were mostly disproven, and he's the martyr for your science is woowoo cause? Coriolis effect is even demostratable when you shoot your turkey, but still not good enough for you. Damn it must be sad to be this brainwashed. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 64698495 United States 11/28/2019 11:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Get in an Airplane and observe the curvature. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 64698495 It is so cool how you have to look DOWN further and further to see the horizon at all. Looking straight out the window at 35,000 feet you see nothing but "outer-space" from either side of the plane. Miles squared X 8 inches one foot = .000189394 miles 1 mile 5.33 ft. .12626 mile 6 miles 24 ft. 10 miles 66.666 ft. .2626 miles 100 miles 6,666.66 ft. 1.626 miles 1000 miles 666,666 ft. 12.2625 miles So on a view of a horizon that stretches dozens of miles in each direction we easily see the Earth curving away and down dozens of feet on both sides. That's why I say we live on a ball! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42079668 United States 11/28/2019 11:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Get in an Airplane and observe the curvature. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 64698495 It is so cool how you have to look DOWN further and further to see the horizon at all. Looking straight out the window at 35,000 feet you see nothing but "outer-space" from either side of the plane. Miles squared X 8 inches one foot = .000189394 miles 1 mile 5.33 ft. .12626 mile 6 miles 24 ft. 10 miles 66.666 ft. .2626 miles 100 miles 6,666.66 ft. 1.626 miles 1000 miles 666,666 ft. 12.2625 miles So on a view of a horizon that stretches dozens of miles in each direction we easily see the Earth curving away and down dozens of feet on both sides. That's why I say we live on a ball! I've been in one. Looks flat as far as I can see and the horizon comes up to eye level, no matter how high up you are. If the earth's surface was curving away then the horizon would be much lower, not at eye level. |
LHP598 User ID: 77436004 United States 11/28/2019 11:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: LHP598 the difference in distance to the Sun is only a few percent. But the amount of sunlight received due to angle of incidence varies a lot more. opinion and speculation, prove this statement in lab experiment. Prove angle of incidence? Are you on crack? It is a known fact. Put a panel perpendicular to an energy source and it receives more than if at an angle. Sorry you never paid attention to the world. Ok so then that means the sun's rays aren't coming in parallel as we are told by erastothenes. That means his calculations were wrong. how does it feel to step into my traps? What trap? As the world is a globe, not all the surface is perpendicular to the sun. Or are you really that stupid? the Sun can not be as close as flatties say it is. It stays the same size throughout the day which should not happen if it were only 3000 miles up as they claim. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42079668 wrong, not only have other people shown it does change size, under a solar filter, it's easily demonstratable yourself. Get a good camera with a solar filter and take picture at different times of the year, you will see it does change size. And I was talking about through the DAY. Please read what it written and not what you wish was written. Ok it will work during the day as well, provided you are at a high enough altitude. Still the fact remains i it changes size AT ALL during the day or year, just disproves the idea it's 93 million miles away, again. Wrong. It does not change size throughout the day. It only changes slightly throughout the year as as already mentioned elsewhere in the post, the Sun is a few percent farther or closer away. It is also known from RADAR and laser reflection as well as trigonometry that the Moon is about 240,000 miles away and the Moon moves in front of the Sun so the Sun has to be farther than that. We've also bounced RADAR off of Venus and Mercury and know that they also pass in front of the sun. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42079668 This is just quoting scientific dogma, let me know when you personally get your own radar and do the experiement yourself, its just like quoting the lunar ranging experiment without having done it yourself I've done the trigonometry for the Moon myself. Still worked. You just have to measure the angle in the sky at the same time as another separated observer and do the math. Still works. And the burden of proof that the RADAR doesn't work is on you. show me one trigonometry formula and your "known" values. Also the burden of proof is on me? So by your logic any woman who claims to have been raped is right by default, it's up to those who say she wasn't raped to prove it? You are either a really bad troll or just extremely stupid. The known values would be the distance between the observers and the angles measured. Since you've proved you are a troll multiple times in this post alone there is no point in digging up the information which you'll just dismiss anyway. And you proved you either don't understand the burden of proof or are still just trolling. In your example the burden of proof would be on the accuser, the woman who claims to have been raped. Just like the burden of proof is on you claiming that RADAR doesn't work. If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law |
syncro User ID: 75835116 United States 11/28/2019 11:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42079668 United States 11/28/2019 11:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
LHP598 User ID: 77436004 United States 11/28/2019 11:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: LHP598 Please read what I wrote and now what you wish I wrote. I did NOT say it has nothing to do with the shape or rotation of the Earth. Quite the opposite. I said it had to do with the change of rotation speed. That mentions rotation and is dependent on the shape. Stop trying to put words in my mouth you troll. You're not very good at it. Ok so then why is Coriolis effect being used as a "proof" of a globe earth then? it's a moot point that doesn't prove anything. But if you want to sit and argue semantics go ahead. you're just a troll, aren't you? First, I didn't use it as proof. I just pointed out that you had no clue what it was. Second, as it depends on rotation and varies based on distance from the equator in a manner consistent with a globe surface it DOES point to a globe surface. And pointing out that you were unable to read what was written and tried to put words in my mouth is NOT arguing semantics, it is pointing out you're a liar and a troll. You call me a troll yet you do exactly what I said you would, you use Coriolis effect as a proof of globe earth. You just contradicted yourself about 3 times yet you call me the troll. At least i'm being consistent. No contradiction. Again, please learn to read. I did NOT use it as proof until that post. And you didn't say I WOULD, you said I had. You can't even troll well. How sad. If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law |
LHP598 User ID: 77436004 United States 11/28/2019 11:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Get in an Airplane and observe the curvature. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 64698495 It is so cool how you have to look DOWN further and further to see the horizon at all. Looking straight out the window at 35,000 feet you see nothing but "outer-space" from either side of the plane. Miles squared X 8 inches one foot = .000189394 miles 1 mile 5.33 ft. .12626 mile 6 miles 24 ft. 10 miles 66.666 ft. .2626 miles 100 miles 6,666.66 ft. 1.626 miles 1000 miles 666,666 ft. 12.2625 miles So on a view of a horizon that stretches dozens of miles in each direction we easily see the Earth curving away and down dozens of feet on both sides. That's why I say we live on a ball! I've been in one. Looks flat as far as I can see and the horizon comes up to eye level, no matter how high up you are. If the earth's surface was curving away then the horizon would be much lower, not at eye level. It is a flattie LIE that the horizon rises to eye level. You can test it yourself but I bet you won't. You could get a theolodite, or a theolodite app, or build your own like this guy But I bet you won't even try. If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76438478 United States 11/28/2019 11:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why because I refuse to accept scientific dogma? Tesla did the same thing and look what happened to him. One dude gets screwed in the AC/DC war, who's public theories were mostly disproven, and he's the martyr for your science is woowoo cause? Coriolis effect is even demostratable when you shoot your turkey, but still not good enough for you. Damn it must be sad to be this brainwashed. Lol just glad I'm not as dumb as you. I can back my shit up, you have conjecture. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42079668 United States 11/28/2019 11:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42079668 Prove angle of incidence? Are you on crack? It is a known fact. Put a panel perpendicular to an energy source and it receives more than if at an angle. Sorry you never paid attention to the world. Ok so then that means the sun's rays aren't coming in parallel as we are told by erastothenes. That means his calculations were wrong. how does it feel to step into my traps? What trap? As the world is a globe, not all the surface is perpendicular to the sun. Or are you really that stupid? but the suns rays are coming in parellel, and from our perspective on ground the earth is flat, the curvature is so sublte that it shouldn't matter. ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42079668 And I was talking about through the DAY. Please read what it written and not what you wish was written. Ok it will work during the day as well, provided you are at a high enough altitude. Still the fact remains i it changes size AT ALL during the day or year, just disproves the idea it's 93 million miles away, again. Wrong. It does not change size throughout the day. It only changes slightly throughout the year as as already mentioned elsewhere in the post, the Sun is a few percent farther or closer away. you are wrong, it's easily demonstrable. Have you gone on top of a mountain and taken pics during the day with a solar filter? No you haven't. ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42079668 I've done the trigonometry for the Moon myself. Still worked. You just have to measure the angle in the sky at the same time as another separated observer and do the math. Still works. And the burden of proof that the RADAR doesn't work is on you. show me one trigonometry formula and your "known" values. Also the burden of proof is on me? So by your logic any woman who claims to have been raped is right by default, it's up to those who say she wasn't raped to prove it? You are either a really bad troll or just extremely stupid. The known values would be the distance between the observers and the angles measured. Since you've proved you are a troll multiple times in this post alone there is no point in digging up the information which you'll just dismiss anyway. And you proved you either don't understand the burden of proof or are still just trolling. In your example the burden of proof would be on the accuser, the woman who claims to have been raped. Just like the burden of proof is on you claiming that RADAR doesn't work. ok so your prerogative is just blindly believe in big science, whatever they say, without question. So cool, that's what you want to do. well I want to question it, and I have good reasons for doing so. So if you are simply going to blindly believe big science why are you sitting here arguing with me. You aren't going to convince me to change my mind so it's beginning to look like you are the troll sir. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77376498 United States 11/28/2019 11:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42079668 United States 11/28/2019 11:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Get in an Airplane and observe the curvature. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 64698495 It is so cool how you have to look DOWN further and further to see the horizon at all. Looking straight out the window at 35,000 feet you see nothing but "outer-space" from either side of the plane. Miles squared X 8 inches one foot = .000189394 miles 1 mile 5.33 ft. .12626 mile 6 miles 24 ft. 10 miles 66.666 ft. .2626 miles 100 miles 6,666.66 ft. 1.626 miles 1000 miles 666,666 ft. 12.2625 miles So on a view of a horizon that stretches dozens of miles in each direction we easily see the Earth curving away and down dozens of feet on both sides. That's why I say we live on a ball! I've been in one. Looks flat as far as I can see and the horizon comes up to eye level, no matter how high up you are. If the earth's surface was curving away then the horizon would be much lower, not at eye level. It is a flattie LIE that the horizon rises to eye level. You can test it yourself but I bet you won't. You could get a theolodite, or a theolodite app, or build your own like this guy But I bet you won't even try. yea how hard is it to slightly lift that device up over the horizon? what a crock. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75000381 United States 11/28/2019 11:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Okay Genius... As proven by cool things like the Hubble Space Telescope and even Space Faring Probes to other Planets in our Solar System. The Earth is a Round Sphere Mars and Jupiter are Round Spherical Masses The Moon is a Round Sphere Orbiting Earth in a Spherical, Orderly, Predictable Path. That is All [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] Check this out and then please stop wasting all these Good Peoples time with your Obtuse and Idiotic Argument. Thanks |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 64698495 United States 11/28/2019 11:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | River prove we live on a ball. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 64698495 You see rivers sometimes run uphill. That's why Dams do not work well. All standing water is convex. People go out and measure the curve in the water. It's so dam cool. The Nile is 30 percent of the Earths diameter and runs 363 miles up hill before it can run down hill. When the water goes on the down hill side it picks up crazy speed. That is why people vacation there to ride the crazy current. People keep saying water finds it level but the Nile River proves the Earth is a Ball. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42079668 United States 11/28/2019 11:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | third time I've posted this :in the interest of educating the flattys. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77376498 this professor lays it out with simple diagrams and simple language and Just repeating the same stuff that we are all brainwashed with. No proof, just more repeating. All those things have been addressed. It's just that people would rather accept scientific dogma rather than question. I guess it's easier to just be brainwashed. |
LHP598 User ID: 77436004 United States 11/28/2019 11:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: LHP598 What trap? As the world is a globe, not all the surface is perpendicular to the sun. Or are you really that stupid? but the suns rays are coming in parellel, and from our perspective on ground the earth is flat, the curvature is so sublte that it shouldn't matter. And what you said has nothing to do with angle of incidence. ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42079668 Wrong. It does not change size throughout the day. It only changes slightly throughout the year as as already mentioned elsewhere in the post, the Sun is a few percent farther or closer away. you are wrong, it's easily demonstrable. Have you gone on top of a mountain and taken pics during the day with a solar filter? No you haven't. Have you? Prove it. ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42079668 You are either a really bad troll or just extremely stupid. The known values would be the distance between the observers and the angles measured. Since you've proved you are a troll multiple times in this post alone there is no point in digging up the information which you'll just dismiss anyway. And you proved you either don't understand the burden of proof or are still just trolling. In your example the burden of proof would be on the accuser, the woman who claims to have been raped. Just like the burden of proof is on you claiming that RADAR doesn't work. ok so your prerogative is just blindly believe in big science, whatever they say, without question. So cool, that's what you want to do. well I want to question it, and I have good reasons for doing so. So if you are simply going to blindly believe big science why are you sitting here arguing with me. You aren't going to convince me to change my mind so it's beginning to look like you are the troll sir. "big science" is repeatable, testable, and consistent. Nothing blind about that. You haven't shown good reasons to question how RADAR works, nor have you shown any understanding. All you've shown is how you don't understand the burden of proof and that you're bad at trolling. If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42079668 United States 11/28/2019 11:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
LHP598 User ID: 77436004 United States 11/28/2019 11:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I've been in one. Looks flat as far as I can see and the horizon comes up to eye level, no matter how high up you are. If the earth's surface was curving away then the horizon would be much lower, not at eye level. It is a flattie LIE that the horizon rises to eye level. You can test it yourself but I bet you won't. You could get a theolodite, or a theolodite app, or build your own like this guy But I bet you won't even try. yea how hard is it to slightly lift that device up over the horizon? what a crock. You really are a moran. If the horizon truly rose to eye level as you claim then it wouldn't matter how much you lifted it. You don't even understand your own lies. Just further proof that flatties don't understand the subject they argue against. Thanks for the humor! Last Edited by LHP598 on 11/28/2019 11:41 AM If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76438478 United States 11/28/2019 11:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42079668 United States 11/28/2019 11:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Please learn to quote correctly. ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42079668 And what you said has nothing to do with angle of incidence. ... Have you? Prove it. ... "big science" is repeatable, testable, and consistent. Nothing blind about that. You haven't shown good reasons to question how RADAR works, nor have you shown any understanding. All you've shown is how you don't understand the burden of proof and that you're bad at trolling. you keep going on about radar but i've provided many other examples to prove my point that are being ignored. Go on repeat the lunar ranging experiment, i'll be back to check to see if you were able to |
Jonesmith User ID: 77158587 United States 11/28/2019 11:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42079668 United States 11/28/2019 11:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 42079668 I've been in one. Looks flat as far as I can see and the horizon comes up to eye level, no matter how high up you are. If the earth's surface was curving away then the horizon would be much lower, not at eye level. It is a flattie LIE that the horizon rises to eye level. You can test it yourself but I bet you won't. You could get a theolodite, or a theolodite app, or build your own like this guy But I bet you won't even try. yea how hard is it to slightly lift that device up over the horizon? what a crock. You really are a moran. If the horizon truly rose to eye level as you claim then it wouldn't matter how much you lifted it. You don't even understand your own lies. Just further proof that flatties don't understand the subject they argue against. Thanks for the humor! it's a tube with liquid. If i was making the video and I wanted to prove my point I would just hold it up a little higher than the horizon. not my fault you are so blinded by your science religion you can't question it |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76438478 United States 11/28/2019 11:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76438478 United States 11/28/2019 11:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: LHP598 It is a flattie LIE that the horizon rises to eye level. You can test it yourself but I bet you won't. You could get a theolodite, or a theolodite app, or build your own like this guy But I bet you won't even try. yea how hard is it to slightly lift that device up over the horizon? what a crock. You really are a moran. If the horizon truly rose to eye level as you claim then it wouldn't matter how much you lifted it. You don't even understand your own lies. Just further proof that flatties don't understand the subject they argue against. Thanks for the humor! it's a tube with liquid. If i was making the video and I wanted to prove my point I would just hold it up a little higher than the horizon. not my fault you are so blinded by your science religion you can't question it You leaving or not? Cause you said you were and this is just proving that you are a liar on top of being a retard. |
LHP598 User ID: 77436004 United States 11/28/2019 11:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: LHP598 It is a flattie LIE that the horizon rises to eye level. You can test it yourself but I bet you won't. You could get a theolodite, or a theolodite app, or build your own like this guy But I bet you won't even try. yea how hard is it to slightly lift that device up over the horizon? what a crock. You really are a moran. If the horizon truly rose to eye level as you claim then it wouldn't matter how much you lifted it. You don't even understand your own lies. Just further proof that flatties don't understand the subject they argue against. Thanks for the humor! it's a tube with liquid. If i was making the video and I wanted to prove my point I would just hold it up a little higher than the horizon. not my fault you are so blinded by your science religion you can't question it I thought you were leaving? If the horizon truly rises to eye level and we can see that the eye is level by looking across the tubes, they it does NOT matter if it is lifted. Not my fault you don't understand your own lies. It proves that the horizon does NOT rise to eye level AND that you don't understand the subject. Thanks for the humor! If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law |