| Users Online Now: 2,287 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 829,909 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,372,396 | Threads Today: 566 | Posts Today: 9,595 |
| 01:58 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,287 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 829,909 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,372,396 | Threads Today: 566 | Posts Today: 9,595 |
| 01:58 PM | ||
Email from Prince Andrew seems to show he does remember Virginia Giuffre | |
Rufus Juice  User ID: 77413848  United States12/02/2019 08:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | i think she recruited other girls along the way too ~ but not her fault ~ she was brought into a fucked up world ran by people that remain untouchable - unless we do the modern equivalent of torches and pitchforks, and call these people out. will we? we havent yet. the media seems to be slow playing this on Andrew. "When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will know peace" Jimi Hendrix |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78211981 United States12/02/2019 08:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | New details surfaced Monday that could challenge Prince Andrew’s claims about his alleged relationship with former Jeffrey Epstein “sex slave” Virginia Roberts Giuffre. Quoting: keybored The royal has insisted he doesn’t remember ever meeting Giuffre, who says she was sex-trafficked to Andrew by his sick pal, Epstein, in 2001. An email from the prince shows Giuffre was at least on Andrew’s mind four years ago, the BBC said. The UK broadcaster said it had a copy of an email sent “From: Duke of York” to pedophile Epstein’s socialite sidekick, Ghislaine Maxwell, in 2015. That’s the year Giuffre sued Maxwell for defamation amid Giuffre’s claims that Epstein raped and trafficked her. “Let me know when we can talk. Got some specific questions to ask you about Virginia Roberts,” the prince allegedly wrote Maxwell. Maxwell responded, “Have some info. Call me when you have a moment,” the BBC said. Prince Andrew said of Giuffre in an interview last month, “I have no recollection of meeting her.” The UK broadcaster revealed the email during its aired interview with Giuffre, in which she called Andrew’s claims “ridiculous.” [link to nypost.com (secure)] Oops! I'm no player, but I've had my time. AND I CAN ASSURE YCU, when I was 50 or so, IF I had a teene begging to be hanging off my dick, I WOULD HAVE REMEMBERED THAT for the REST OF MY LIFE. Its just the way it is, even for a spoilt royal. If he had many teens it would go towards why he doesn't remember her in particularly. Would you remember who was who if you had many 'hanging off your dick' (you have a way with words,lol) over a period of time? . Well, lets review the monarchy. For most of history monarchs enjoyed privilieges not meant for the mortals. The royals had life and death powers, where free to indulge their sexual whims without reproach from public scrutiny, even went so far as to get first crack at the bride before the groom, even in merry old England. Royals who, incidently like to trace their fictional heritage back to kings David or Solomon( who curiously cannot be proven to have ever existed in any objective fashion.} Royalty is a nioe name for organized criminality and should be recognized as such. Too bad few are capable of putting up any resistance to thugs in ermine and crowns, stolen from the sweat and blood of their captives who struggled and died in what what essentially a slave labor nation run by malignant narcissists. Royals are criminals, which is why criminality always feeds back to them. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78211981 United States12/02/2019 08:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If they were, which belief system would make it reasonable to get rid of the evidence of their excessis in accordance with their official if not always clearly understood doctrine? Go ahead, make a guess, the clues are all around you. |
| abrock User ID: 77817863 United States12/02/2019 09:28 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Have a feeling the posters blaming the victim would feel differently if the girl was Chelsea Horseface Clinton and instead of Andrew, it was Giuliani. They'd be screaming "RAPE- hang that bastard. He was mature and she was just a child!" You people are disgusting and so obvious. |
| Jungleboogie User ID: 76648271  Canada12/02/2019 09:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | “Let me know when we can talk. Got some specific questions to ask you about Virginia Roberts,” the prince allegedly wrote Maxwell. Quoting: nutmeg If you see that a person by the name of Virginia Roberts is suing you/accusing you, and if you don't remember anything about her, couldn't you have specific questions about her? What am I missing? That might be an appropriate email if it was to his lawyer and not to the madam.  Embrace the cognitive dissonance. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77884098 United States12/02/2019 09:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78214877  Australia12/02/2019 09:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78211981 I'm no player, but I've had my time. AND I CAN ASSURE YCU, when I was 50 or so, IF I had a teene begging to be hanging off my dick, I WOULD HAVE REMEMBERED THAT for the REST OF MY LIFE. Its just the way it is, even for a spoilt royal. He was 50 or so? He's 59 now. She's 36. I still don't understand it all. When I was 16 and 17, I didn't do anything I didn't want to. I knew right from wrong long before that. No one could have "forced" me to travel to England or to some island in the Caribbean to entertain men for several years. I think people are missing the much bigger point which is that he was probably involved in sex trafficking. Who's to say she and the other girls weren't drugged? You seriously think he came across as forthright in that interview?? The email was sent in 2015. We're not talking 20 years ago here. Does he have memory issues? You think he hasn't searched his emails over the past year? He LIED in that interview. Aww sweetie, still naive are yeh? Sex trafficing? You think thats all? All the bullshit, lies, mystery money, improbable history. Part time prison, semite club highjinks and 'lapses' nobody eles gets, not to mention evasion of taxes in transfer of dozens of millions in wealth without compensation or contribution to the community chest, like the rest of us must do? It was SUBVERSION OF THE WESTERN GOVERNMENT for a foreign Theocratic spy and blackmail system. It was a theocratic control op, making you all their bitch. THATS why they allow this peripubescent sex circus go go to the fore, so long that NOBODY mentions that the entire episode is about compromising the western worlds movers and shakers to be blackmailed into supporting a parasite state whos very underpinnings are rooted in antigentilism that can never fade. In you I am disappoint. This. Notice MSM never mentions blackmail. Focusses on the salacious sexual details to divert the inquiry. Just a limited hangout. Andrew serves that purpose well, even if he doesn't like it. |
| Jungleboogie User ID: 76648271 Canada12/02/2019 10:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: nutmeg He was 50 or so? He's 59 now. She's 36. I still don't understand it all. When I was 16 and 17, I didn't do anything I didn't want to. I knew right from wrong long before that. No one could have "forced" me to travel to England or to some island in the Caribbean to entertain men for several years. I think people are missing the much bigger point which is that he was probably involved in sex trafficking. Who's to say she and the other girls weren't drugged? You seriously think he came across as forthright in that interview?? The email was sent in 2015. We're not talking 20 years ago here. Does he have memory issues? You think he hasn't searched his emails over the past year? He LIED in that interview. Aww sweetie, still naive are yeh? Sex trafficing? You think thats all? All the bullshit, lies, mystery money, improbable history. Part time prison, semite club highjinks and 'lapses' nobody eles gets, not to mention evasion of taxes in transfer of dozens of millions in wealth without compensation or contribution to the community chest, like the rest of us must do? It was SUBVERSION OF THE WESTERN GOVERNMENT for a foreign Theocratic spy and blackmail system. It was a theocratic control op, making you all their bitch. THATS why they allow this peripubescent sex circus go go to the fore, so long that NOBODY mentions that the entire episode is about compromising the western worlds movers and shakers to be blackmailed into supporting a parasite state whos very underpinnings are rooted in antigentilism that can never fade. In you I am disappoint. This. Notice MSM never mentions blackmail. Focusses on the salacious sexual details to divert the inquiry. Just a limited hangout. Andrew serves that purpose well, even if he doesn't like it. Embrace the cognitive dissonance. |
| Randy Nacho User ID: 73222125 United States12/02/2019 10:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Radar Radar User ID: 73222125 United States12/02/2019 10:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| rahijo3 User ID: 78217597 United States12/02/2019 10:30 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77795222 United States12/02/2019 10:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| nutmeg User ID: 76388104 United States12/02/2019 10:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I read something on Drudge Report today that a woman claimed to be 17 at the time when she was first trafficked to the Prince. I thought the age of consent was 16 in the UK. Quoting: rahijo3 You're correct. I mentioned that once also, then somebody told me that they might be trying to nail Andrew because the woman was a prostitute. Remember, now she's claiming she was "forced" although she looks happy to be with him in any of the photographs we see. Prostitution in the United Kingdom In Great Britain (England, Wales and Scotland), prostitution itself (the exchange of sexual services for money) is legal. Although the age of consent is 16 throughout the United Kingdom, it is illegal to buy sex from a person younger than 18. In England and Wales, it is an offence to pay for sex with a prostitute who has been "subjected to force" and this is a strict liability offence (clients can be prosecuted even if they did not know the prostitute was forced). [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] Last Edited by nutmeg on 12/03/2019 12:00 AM |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77569959 United States12/02/2019 10:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Jungleboogie User ID: 76648271 Canada12/02/2019 10:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I read something on Drudge Report today that a woman claimed to be 17 at the time when she was first trafficked to the Prince. I thought the age of consent was 16 in the UK. Quoting: rahijo3 You're correct. I mentioned that once also, then somebody told me that they might be trying to nail Andrew because the woman was a prostitute. Now I see this. Remember, now she's claiming she was "forced" although she looks happy to be with him in any of the photographs we see. Prostitution in the United Kingdom In Great Britain (England, Wales and Scotland), prostitution itself (the exchange of sexual services for money) is legal. Although the age of consent is 16 throughout the United Kingdom, it is illegal to buy sex from a person younger than 18. In England and Wales, it is an offence to pay for sex with a prostitute who has been "subjected to force" and this is a strict liability offence (clients can be prosecuted even if they did not know the prostitute was forced). [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] Customers Soliciting someone for the purpose of obtaining their sexual services as a prostitute is an offence if the soliciting takes place in a street or public place (whether in a vehicle or not). This is a broader restriction than the 1985 ban on kerb-crawling. It is now also an offence to make or promise payment for the sexual services of a prostitute if the prostitute has been subjected to "exploitative conduct" (force, threats or deception) to bring about such an arrangement for gain. This is a strict liability offence (clients can be prosecuted even if they did not know the prostitute was forced).[66] Additionally there exists an offence of paying for sexual services of a child (anyone under 18). From your own link. Embrace the cognitive dissonance. |
| Psychonaut SN7 User ID: 76355711 United States12/02/2019 11:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | He seems half retarded. When are they gonna charge this bitch jizzstain maxunwell? Quoting: Miss Bunny Swan There not she’s a handler for Mossad... "The syntactical nature of reality, the real secret of magic, is that the world is made of words. And if you know the words that the world is made of, you can make of it whatever you wish." ~ Terence McKenna |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77506855 United States12/02/2019 11:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 11376882 United States12/02/2019 11:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Simple27 User ID: 40488826 United States12/03/2019 12:19 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | New details surfaced Monday that could challenge Prince Andrew’s claims about his alleged relationship with former Jeffrey Epstein “sex slave” Virginia Roberts Giuffre. Quoting: keybored The royal has insisted he doesn’t remember ever meeting Giuffre, who says she was sex-trafficked to Andrew by his sick pal, Epstein, in 2001. An email from the prince shows Giuffre was at least on Andrew’s mind four years ago, the BBC said. The UK broadcaster said it had a copy of an email sent “From: Duke of York” to pedophile Epstein’s socialite sidekick, Ghislaine Maxwell, in 2015. That’s the year Giuffre sued Maxwell for defamation amid Giuffre’s claims that Epstein raped and trafficked her. “Let me know when we can talk. Got some specific questions to ask you about Virginia Roberts,” the prince allegedly wrote Maxwell. Maxwell responded, “Have some info. Call me when you have a moment,” the BBC said. Prince Andrew said of Giuffre in an interview last month, “I have no recollection of meeting her.” The UK broadcaster revealed the email during its aired interview with Giuffre, in which she called Andrew’s claims “ridiculous.” [link to nypost.com (secure)] Oops! How is that stepping in it? Roberts named Prince Andrew in her first go round with the lawsuit. He wants to know who she is, he emails his "friend" to ask?  ~*Ride the Wave*~ |
| Jungleboogie User ID: 76648271 Canada12/03/2019 12:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | New details surfaced Monday that could challenge Prince Andrew’s claims about his alleged relationship with former Jeffrey Epstein “sex slave” Virginia Roberts Giuffre. Quoting: keybored The royal has insisted he doesn’t remember ever meeting Giuffre, who says she was sex-trafficked to Andrew by his sick pal, Epstein, in 2001. An email from the prince shows Giuffre was at least on Andrew’s mind four years ago, the BBC said. The UK broadcaster said it had a copy of an email sent “From: Duke of York” to pedophile Epstein’s socialite sidekick, Ghislaine Maxwell, in 2015. That’s the year Giuffre sued Maxwell for defamation amid Giuffre’s claims that Epstein raped and trafficked her. “Let me know when we can talk. Got some specific questions to ask you about Virginia Roberts,” the prince allegedly wrote Maxwell. Maxwell responded, “Have some info. Call me when you have a moment,” the BBC said. Prince Andrew said of Giuffre in an interview last month, “I have no recollection of meeting her.” The UK broadcaster revealed the email during its aired interview with Giuffre, in which she called Andrew’s claims “ridiculous.” [link to nypost.com (secure)] Oops! How is that stepping in it? Roberts named Prince Andrew in her first go round with the lawsuit. He wants to know who she is, he emails his "friend" to ask?  Embrace the cognitive dissonance. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 74453562 United States12/03/2019 01:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Louis in Richmond That is my arm now; broken for 7 months User ID: 72823842 United States12/03/2019 01:11 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | New details surfaced Monday that could challenge Prince Andrew’s claims about his alleged relationship with former Jeffrey Epstein “sex slave” Virginia Roberts Giuffre. Quoting: keybored The royal has insisted he doesn’t remember ever meeting Giuffre, who says she was sex-trafficked to Andrew by his sick pal, Epstein, in 2001. An email from the prince shows Giuffre was at least on Andrew’s mind four years ago, the BBC said. The UK broadcaster said it had a copy of an email sent “From: Duke of York” to pedophile Epstein’s socialite sidekick, Ghislaine Maxwell, in 2015. That’s the year Giuffre sued Maxwell for defamation amid Giuffre’s claims that Epstein raped and trafficked her. “Let me know when we can talk. Got some specific questions to ask you about Virginia Roberts,” the prince allegedly wrote Maxwell. Maxwell responded, “Have some info. Call me when you have a moment,” the BBC said. Prince Andrew said of Giuffre in an interview last month, “I have no recollection of meeting her.” The UK broadcaster revealed the email during its aired interview with Giuffre, in which she called Andrew’s claims “ridiculous.” [link to nypost.com (secure)] Oops! How is that stepping in it? Roberts named Prince Andrew in her first go round with the lawsuit. He wants to know who she is, he emails his "friend" to ask? It's frightening to realize how easy it is to spot the pedophile enablers / supporters on the forum. Until your military service has required you neutralize enemy combatants and invaders in the defense of your country, don't presume to tell us that have defended you that you don't support every shot we fired to eliminate that enemy. |
| SEVENTH HEAD User ID: 74996941  France12/03/2019 02:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well, lets review the monarchy. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78211981 For most of history monarchs enjoyed privilieges not meant for the mortals. The royals had life and death powers, where free to indulge their sexual whims without reproach from public scrutiny, even went so far as to get first crack at the bride before the groom, even in merry old England. Royals who, incidently like to trace their fictional heritage back to kings David or Solomon( who curiously cannot be proven to have ever existed in any objective fashion.} Royalty is a nioe name for organized criminality and should be recognized as such. Too bad few are capable of putting up any resistance to thugs in ermine and crowns, stolen from the sweat and blood of their captives who struggled and died in what what essentially a slave labor nation run by malignant narcissists. Royals are criminals, which is why criminality always feeds back to them. You got the wrong glasses to see it that way: Thread: WARNING: Will You Accept Prince George As Your Lord And His Parents As The Two Witnesses? SEVENTH HEAD |
| Dork of York User ID: 78099421 Australia12/03/2019 02:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The fact that he has been stood down from duties is an admission in my book. If he were telling the truth (can't remember a hot young screw) then why is he stood down. Could it be to get him out of the limelight and hope it all goes away? He will be subpoenaed to court and whether he appears or not will speak volumes. |
| Blue State Rebel User ID: 73724632 United States12/03/2019 02:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78217626 Australia12/03/2019 03:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Funny, when they get caught steeping in shit, they can't remember anything. Quoting: tibetbill 77798507 I just take it as a woman of that name claimed what she did at the time .. he emailed to ask re It..as we all would. Bottom line is she chose to be a prostitute ... sex slaves are not grinning at the cash and having a BF they head home to. She was a teenage prostitute by choice, nothing more. Now shes a bullshite artist wanting cash and showing her kids mumma was teen trash. |
| keybored (OP) User ID: 77443882  Belgium12/03/2019 04:47 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| keybored (OP) User ID: 77443882 Belgium12/03/2019 04:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here's another thought nugget for ya OP! Quoting: Jungleboogie WHY IS ABC STILL SITTING ON EPSTEIN STORY AND VIRGINIA ROBERTS INTERVIEW? Corroboration ALL OVER the place now. THEY ARE STILL SITTING ON THE STORY AND INTERVIEW!!!!!!!!!!!!! Someone should mass twitter Amy Rorbach, ABC and Ronan Farrow. Do we really need to answer that question, lol? It's blatantly obvious to anyone that isn't braindead. Even half-witted liberals can figure out they are STILL assisting in covering it up, but their saying nothing condones their actions. |
| keybored (OP) User ID: 77443882 Belgium12/03/2019 04:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation |  |
| keybored (OP) User ID: 77443882 Belgium12/03/2019 04:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | New details surfaced Monday that could challenge Prince Andrew’s claims about his alleged relationship with former Jeffrey Epstein “sex slave” Virginia Roberts Giuffre. Quoting: keybored The royal has insisted he doesn’t remember ever meeting Giuffre, who says she was sex-trafficked to Andrew by his sick pal, Epstein, in 2001. An email from the prince shows Giuffre was at least on Andrew’s mind four years ago, the BBC said. The UK broadcaster said it had a copy of an email sent “From: Duke of York” to pedophile Epstein’s socialite sidekick, Ghislaine Maxwell, in 2015. That’s the year Giuffre sued Maxwell for defamation amid Giuffre’s claims that Epstein raped and trafficked her. “Let me know when we can talk. Got some specific questions to ask you about Virginia Roberts,” the prince allegedly wrote Maxwell. Maxwell responded, “Have some info. Call me when you have a moment,” the BBC said. Prince Andrew said of Giuffre in an interview last month, “I have no recollection of meeting her.” The UK broadcaster revealed the email during its aired interview with Giuffre, in which she called Andrew’s claims “ridiculous.” [link to nypost.com (secure)] Oops! I'm no player, but I've had my time. AND I CAN ASSURE YCU, when I was 50 or so, IF I had a teene begging to be hanging off my dick, I WOULD HAVE REMEMBERED THAT for the REST OF MY LIFE. Its just the way it is, even for a spoilt royal. He was 50 or so? He's 59 now. She's 36. I still don't understand it all. When I was 16 and 17, I didn't do anything I didn't want to. I knew right from wrong long before that. No one could have "forced" me to travel to England or to some island in the Caribbean to entertain men for several years. I think people are missing the much bigger point which is that he was probably involved in sex trafficking. Who's to say she and the other girls weren't drugged? You seriously think he came across as forthright in that interview?? The email was sent in 2015. We're not talking 20 years ago here. Does he have memory issues? You think he hasn't searched his emails over the past year? He LIED in that interview. There is no 'probably' here because there is already proof that they were trafficking underage girls. |
