Why Sexual Morality May be Far More Important than You Ever Thought

Unwin examines the data from 86 societies and civilizations to see if there is a relationship between sexual freedom and the flourishing of cultures. What makes the book especially interesting is that we in the West underwent a sexual revolution in the late 1960’s, 70’s, and 80’s and are now in a position to test the conclusions he arrived at more than 40 years earlier.

So what did he find?

I have prepared a 26-page collection of quotes from his book that summarize his findings; but even that would leave you with a significant under-appreciation of the rigour and fascinating details revealed in data from 86 cultures. Here are a few of his most significant findings:

Effect of sexual constraints: Increased sexual constraints, either pre or post-nuptial, always led to increased flourishing of a culture. Conversely, increased sexual freedom always led to the collapse of a culture three generations later.

Single most influential factor: Surprisingly, the data revealed that the single most important correlation with the flourishing of a culture was whether pre-nuptial chastity was required or not. It had a very significant effect either way.

Highest flourishing of culture: The most powerful combination was pre-nuptial chastity coupled with “absolute monogamy”. Rationalist cultures that retained this combination for at least three generations exceeded all other cultures in every area, including literature, art, science, furniture, architecture, engineering, and agriculture. Only three out of the eighty-six cultures studied ever attained this level.

Effect of abandoning prenuptial chastity: When strict prenuptial chastity was no longer the norm, absolute monogamy, deism, and rational thinking also disappeared within three generations.

Total sexual freedom: If total sexual freedom was embraced by a culture, that culture collapsed within three generations to the lowest state of flourishing — which Unwin describes as “inert” and at a “dead level of conception” and is characterized by people who have little interest in much else other than their own wants and needs. At this level, the culture is usually conquered or taken over by another culture with greater social energy.

Time lag: If there is a change in sexual constraints, either increased or decreased restraints, the full effect of that change is not realized until the third generation. (Note: I’ve added a clarifying footnote at the end of this article. See footnote #13)

[link to frjohnpeck.com (secure)]

More conservatives cultures have always conquered liberal cultures.

Eww, crabs and clap potatoes? No thanks

The Enemy knows and that is why they pervert our children any way they can at every level. The institutions have been compromised. It is up to each family to raise our children in Christian doctrine and morals and together we can try to correct the trend.

I love this!


Let’s blame some sexual factor!

How often do you think about money?

How often do you think about sex?


The creation of money and its management is primary to the sexual urge.

Economists and biologists are not related.


Your government will likely kill you no matter of your sexual habits.


Your welcome!

In my almost 60 years of life, there is nothing I can come up with to dismiss the conclusions presented.

To let our basest instincts control our daily lives means that we have very little energy or interest in science, philosophy, and the betterment of our planet.

BS

Love which physical emanation is sex is essential force of creation, not only of offspring but anything what can be "build" in life.

Secret societies and highly advanced individuals use tantric practices and or sexual magic to bind the world around to their will.

Orgasmic spark is a spark of creational force of "God" as this is a sample of loving energy used in creation of all life including interactions and opportunities between the living their time on Earch.

Ancient cultures were flourishing in their sexual lives and were much more advanced technically, medically and socially than medieval cultures which abstained from sex and had much constraints implanted by a christian churches which since their inception were of evil purpose: wolf's clothed as sheep to destroy and corrupt mankind by controlling and editing teachings of Christ and prophets to bad will of their hellish principals.

OP just copy pasted some BS book coming from man who either was disinfo agent or just totally wrong.Also giving examples of "civilizations" of XX century is completely without point as progress of those had nothing to do with sexual life and it is actually blatant lie while looking at present world countries and their advancement and society in relation to sexual life.

Relating sex to something wrong is one of biggest devil tricks to divide and destroy mankind by separating relationship between female and male polarities which is of divine nature.

1 star for hot headed copy paste moran post.

Unwin examines the data from 86 societies and civilizations to see if there is a relationship between sexual freedom and the flourishing of cultures. What makes the book especially interesting is that we in the West underwent a sexual revolution in the late 1960’s, 70’s, and 80’s and are now in a position to test the conclusions he arrived at more than 40 years earlier.

So what did he find?

I have prepared a 26-page collection of quotes from his book that summarize his findings; but even that would leave you with a significant under-appreciation of the rigour and fascinating details revealed in data from 86 cultures. Here are a few of his most significant findings:

Effect of sexual constraints: Increased sexual constraints, either pre or post-nuptial, always led to increased flourishing of a culture. Conversely, increased sexual freedom always led to the collapse of a culture three generations later.

Single most influential factor: Surprisingly, the data revealed that the single most important correlation with the flourishing of a culture was whether pre-nuptial chastity was required or not. It had a very significant effect either way.

Highest flourishing of culture: The most powerful combination was pre-nuptial chastity coupled with “absolute monogamy”. Rationalist cultures that retained this combination for at least three generations exceeded all other cultures in every area, including literature, art, science, furniture, architecture, engineering, and agriculture. Only three out of the eighty-six cultures studied ever attained this level.

Effect of abandoning prenuptial chastity: When strict prenuptial chastity was no longer the norm, absolute monogamy, deism, and rational thinking also disappeared within three generations.

Total sexual freedom: If total sexual freedom was embraced by a culture, that culture collapsed within three generations to the lowest state of flourishing — which Unwin describes as “inert” and at a “dead level of conception” and is characterized by people who have little interest in much else other than their own wants and needs. At this level, the culture is usually conquered or taken over by another culture with greater social energy.

Time lag: If there is a change in sexual constraints, either increased or decreased restraints, the full effect of that change is not realized until the third generation. (Note: I’ve added a clarifying footnote at the end of this article. See footnote #13)

[link to frjohnpeck.com (secure)]

So by this logic, the sexually-prudish Muslims will dominate one Western civilization collapses?

What happens when the entire world is leftist communist and has no morality? Who conquers that? Perhaps ET has already conquered this planet and global slavery is the result.

More conservatives cultures have always conquered liberal cultures.

At one point God destroyed the whole world and he's gonna do it again.

Many people think the Turks had some great inventions, but those were actually stolen from the Greeks.

In my almost 60 years of life, there is nothing I can come up with to dismiss the conclusions presented.

To let our basest instincts control our daily lives means that we have very little energy or interest in science, philosophy, and the betterment of our planet.

He promised Noah that he would never do that again, wiping out the whole world. But He can do quite a bit of destruction. He could redo the destruction of the Tower of Babel, or of Sodom and Gomorrah, or of the Temple (although the next Temple is supposed to be permanent) ...

No it's not.

bonobos overcoming social tension

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

He promised Noah that he would never do that again, wiping out the whole world. But He can do quite a bit of destruction. He could redo the destruction of the Tower of Babel, or of Sodom and Gomorrah, or of the Temple (although the next Temple is supposed to be permanent) ...

Conquered?? The always. libtards disintegrate and fall apart from within. No morality, no integrity, no backbone.

Whats to conquer? Just sitback and watch them collapse in three generations. how many generations has it been since the 1960's ??

He promised Noah that he would never do that again, wiping out the whole world. But He can do quite a bit of destruction. He could redo the destruction of the Tower of Babel, or of Sodom and Gomorrah, or of the Temple (although the next Temple is supposed to be permanent) ...