Trump signs law allowing US authorities to shoot down private drones without warrants

Does anyone get the feeling that anyone supporting the police state now is a paid NSA shill?

[link to www.theguardian.com (secure)]

You should think about starting a thread with that article for some fun discussion...test the local Bots’ reactions.

: HillaryWitch1:

They are terrified of "drones", and they really should be. Most people don't understand just how far the consumer market has advanced. I fly drones, I build them, I mod them. I have a drone I fly with VR goggles. It's range is only limited by it's battery. It can carry nearly twenty pounds. Imagine what you could do with such a thing if you had bad intentions. The thing is, the Second Amendment is not about "guns". It's about "arms", and those arms are not meant to be stuck in the 1700's. The Second applies to drones. It applies to murder bots. It applies to all military arms.

So what you are saying is we should all have gunships with nukes parked on a strip in our back yard?

Unless it's at close range, you should expect ALOT of ammo to be expended in taking an RC plane or a drone out of the sky.

Drones have turned into nuclear missiles for the common man.

No wonder the US Government wants them banned or regulated now.

No one is really safe.

I'll settle for a self-propelled launcher mounted on a jeep with a few Davy Crocket projectiles...

I own a lot of property. Fly your drone around these parts gets one warning then a .273 Winchester snipers round.
Airports, private property, pools, etc......
It’s a risk you take knowingly.
Deal with it.
Your drone has no rights.

I own a lot of property. Fly your drone around these parts gets one warning then a .273 Winchester snipers round.
Airports, private property, pools, etc......
It’s a risk you take knowingly.
Deal with it.
Your drone has no rights.

So what you are saying is we should all have gunships with nukes parked on a strip in our back yard?

you do the same for manned aircraft?

they are now considered equal under the law.

shooting at a drone is equivalent to shooting at an airliner according to the new laws.

Emerging tech will be anti-drone devices, designed to scramble the airwaves electronically in the immediate area to prevent drone-usage.

How much this will cost, and with what amount of (device) wattage needed will be that key to perimeter self-defense.

Unless it's at close range, you should expect ALOT of ammo to be expended in taking an RC plane or a drone out of the sky.

Drones have turned into nuclear missiles for the common man.

No wonder the US Government wants them banned or regulated now.

No one is really safe.

You can literally buy a jet fighter if you have the money. I own artillery pieces. I own anti-material rifles. So yeah, if you can afford a gunship, you should be able to have one.

Does anyone get the feeling that anyone supporting the police state now is a paid NSA shill?

[link to www.theguardian.com (secure)]

Your quoting an 8 year old article then claiming its trump.

Troll

No interest in addressing the nukes m8?

Yeah look at all the drone deaths

It’s horrifying here in America

We should ban them too so that only the government has them, just like guns, right?

More proof of an organized disinformation campaign by this Administration to embrace more RINO policy

You fucking people are becoming a liability

Nothing but dead weight

Like all you sheep are asleep

Again

Wake the fuck up GLP

Nukes aren't arms, they are WMD's. Arms refers to weapons carried and deployed by soldiers, vehicles, equipment. You are just being purposely retarded in an attempt to prove a point you don't even understand.

Look GLP

Another fake CHRISTIAN CONSERVATIVE espousing violence through tyranny

More proof GLP has become the very thing it claims to hate

Foaming at the mouth like a rabid dog

Winning!

Anti-drone tech is already a thing. Look up "MARTEK MARINE ANTI-DRONE". They sell them to people who own super yachts. In fact, a lot of the neat mil-tech is marketed to yacht owners. The FLIR cameras, the night vision, the radar, the rebreather systems, water purification, etc. All this yacht stuff is mil-tech.

I understand just fine, it's ok if someone decides what arms are, as long as you agree with that person.

If drones are arms, then they can't fly over private property, as that's armed intrusion, and can be dealt with like armed intruder armed with rifle or pistol.

Nukes aren't arms, they are WMD's. Arms refers to weapons carried and deployed by soldiers, vehicles, equipment. You are just being purposely retarded in an attempt to prove a point you don't even understand.