So, the OP (writer) claims I won (though he didn't mean it), going on to post more Q trash. In thread: Thread: An introduction to ‘Q’

Whatever the situation is in Virginia the concern may be a gun-grab; Q is included because of a duped grass roots campaign catalyzed by a FRIKKING computer program that put a person worth 100s of MILLIONS of dollars in charge AND convinced his QBOTs he was an outsider!.

Then the OP (starteer) claims (check his reply posts or don't it's there).

"Q is teaching people "how to think" -It's the Trivium method, and "because I didn't invoke it" (apparently because NO RESPONSE TO THE POINTS I MADE WERE GIVEN), it appears he thought "he had already won".

TRIVIUM logic is taguth as a method pertaining the discerning truh: It involes "Logic", "Grammar", and "Rhetoric".

Adults who cite it thus far to my mind comes across as poeple who AUDITED a Philosophy 102 course (College Critical Thinking and Analysis) then pretend everything they say is correct "because they know how to think""

The Dude even invoked "the Socratic method and process" then failed to realized that in so doing HE was placed to answer to how "His truth" is "more true" than "my truth" WITHOUT EVEN ATTEMPTING TO PROVE HE CONSIDERED THE INFORMATION.

By the way were "the point" the "trivium thinker" didn't answer to, they were formed around one principle: FOLLOW THE MONEY -something beyond the "Logic of Trivium"

Unless you actually read how people that KNOW how to make a point, because they USE GRAMMAR; LOGIC; AND RHETORIC to do so. I know other do it ALL THE TIME here, here's a few examples of my doing it:
Thread: THE PROBLEMS ARE SYSTEMIC. ADDRESS THE ROOT OF THE SYSTEM.
Thread: THE SPIRIT OF LAW, THE US CONSTITUTION, & THE FEDERAL RESERVE *UPDATE* BRIEF OUTLINE FOR ONE GLOBAL, CIVIL REVOLUTION