| Users Online Now: 1,694 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 535,585 | |
| Pageviews Today: 829,554 | Threads Today: 328 | Posts Today: 4,378 |
| 09:18 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,694 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 535,585 | |
| Pageviews Today: 829,554 | Threads Today: 328 | Posts Today: 4,378 |
| 09:18 AM | ||
Is "pink" inherently a "feminine color"... | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77134059  United States01/27/2020 01:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 75987930  Russia01/27/2020 01:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Pink is a very feminine color, and peaches and corals, and love them always. But love many mixed colors as color is pure joy, art and fiber arts. Quoting: Sungaze_At_Dawn It also flatters complexions including mens. As for being the pale version of warring red, rather than passionate and loving red. That's misogyny 101, twisting reality for their war games. The other half has completely different interpretations of colors and in every generation thought those were dinks. Let me guess you must either be a gay man or a white woman that loves black men as those are the types that love wearing all pink, or you're a black man that dates and fucks white women and you love pink because you know all white women that wear all pink love you black men. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77964044 United States01/27/2020 01:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77030931 United States01/27/2020 01:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78382687  Australia01/27/2020 02:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77161401 United States01/27/2020 02:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77964044 United States01/27/2020 02:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77417185  Germany01/27/2020 03:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: ALL IS ONE IS ALL then put some on and post you in it as your avatar or upload it as a smilie. i just fuckin said pink is bullshit? you wouldn't catch me dead in pink! Men wearing pink look gay as fuck Women wearing all pink, especially all bright pink on the other hand look so super hot, beautiful, and feminine. I would absolutely love white girls wearing super bright pink except for the fact that it seems like white girls that wear all pink, especially all bright pink a lot always seem to be super liberal and love black men, and have black boyfriends or husbands and almost always black kids too. In fact I've never seen a white girl wearing all pink, especially all bright pink that wasn't super liberal and that didn't have a black boyfriend or husband unfortunately. Which is an absolute shame. Since white girls look so hot and feminine in bright pink. I used to get sexually aroused by a white girl wearing all bright pink. Now when I see a girl wearing all bright pink I get prepared to be disgusted thinking yeah she's hot and looks super hot beautiful and feminine in all that bright pink but I'm also 100% sure she's got to be a mudsh*rk since sadly white girls that wear all pink, especially all bright pink always are. And sadly I'm always right. Completely agree on pink for girls, makes you more interested in them, on the other hand pink makes men look weak, picture a criminal walking down the streets wearing pink, is like he isn't even a criminal. Pink is a feminine color. Tell those rappers some girls like to wear pink a lot... see how less women approach them. Scratch that pink is a weak color. I fully agree. And here's a bunch of pictures of Heidi Klum with Seal and dressed all in beautiful bright pink. [link to www.alamy.com (secure)] Damn she looks so fucking hot and feminine and makes for such great eyecandy in all that beautiful blindingly bright pink and such a lovely sight seeing her with Seal well dressed all in bright pink. It'd be so awesome if Heidi and Seal hot back together and she dressed all in bright pink all the time. There is nothing hotter and more beautiful than seeing a hot white girl all dressed in beautiful blindingly bright pink with a black man, especially if they also have black kids too. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77417185 Germany01/27/2020 03:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Btw here's some more pictures and videos of Heidi Klum wearing all beautiful blindingly bright pink. Enjoy. [link to www.i-mockery.com] [link to www.instagram.com (secure)] eaterpvTr/ [link to m.facebook.com (secure)] |
Colour Crusader  User ID: 78241971 Germany01/27/2020 04:33 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I read somewhere a long time ago that pink actually used to be the "baby color" for boys, and that blue used to be the color for girls. Now they are the opposite. Why? Pink encourages "masculine" qualities. Blue calms. So now we have "calm" men and belligerent women - part of the agenda. This article [link to www.thevintagenews.com (secure)] covers some of the history. But it makes no mention of deliberate change to fit in with an agenda ... Not unless you are male and go the Joto Virus from Mexico. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78068745 Otherwise, yes pink is feminine.  Colour Crusader: may we fill the world with vibrant colour, constant critical assessment and deep compassion, moving ever forward towards a paradise of our own creating Thread THE WORLD WILL BECOME PEACEFUL, BEAUTIFUL AND ABUNDANT IF .. Thread: The world will become peaceful, beautiful and abundant IF .... Thread INCREDIBLE VOICES: THE MOST PERSONAL EXPRESSION OF THE HUMAN CONDITION Thread: INCREDIBLE VOICES, AND MUSIC WHICH COMFORTS AND INSPIRES IN DIFFICULT TIMES Thread: WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM? CHOOSE THE QUALITY WHICH HELPS Thread: HOW WE CAN SOLVE GLOBAL PROBLEMS BY CHOOSING A NUMBER BETWEEN 1 and 100 Thread: HOW FULFILLING IS YOUR JOB? WHAT IS YOUR VOCATION? DREAM ON ... Thread: IS YOUR JOB USEFUL, AND HAVE RECENT DEVELOPMENTS HELPED YOU TO REFLECT ON YOUR REAL VOCATION? Thread: QUESTION OF THE DAY Thread Thread: QUESTION OF THE DAY: SELF-REFLECTION IS ESSENTIAL FOR SURVIVAL |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77134059 United States01/27/2020 04:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I read somewhere a long time ago that pink actually used to be the "baby color" for boys, and that blue used to be the color for girls. Now they are the opposite. Why? Pink encourages "masculine" qualities. Blue calms. So now we have "calm" men and belligerent women - part of the agenda. This article [link to www.thevintagenews.com (secure)] covers some of the history. But it makes no mention of deliberate change to fit in with an agenda ... Quoting: Colour Crusader Not unless you are male and go the Joto Virus from Mexico. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78068745 Otherwise, yes pink is feminine. Well, CC, actually in ancient roman times the boys wore pink, so its a matter of opinion really. in those times men wore robes dyed in red, and their sons wore pink as a sign of purity, in a way. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 44411968 United States01/27/2020 05:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I read somewhere a long time ago that pink actually used to be the "baby color" for boys, and that blue used to be the color for girls. Now they are the opposite. Why? Pink encourages "masculine" qualities. Blue calms. So now we have "calm" men and belligerent women - part of the agenda. This article [link to www.thevintagenews.com (secure)] covers some of the history. But it makes no mention of deliberate change to fit in with an agenda ... Quoting: Colour Crusader Not unless you are male and go the Joto Virus from Mexico. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78068745 Otherwise, yes pink is feminine. Well, CC, actually in ancient roman times the boys wore pink, so its a matter of opinion really. in those times men wore robes dyed in red, and their sons wore pink as a sign of purity, in a way. buy expensive food, like fine patisserie sweets. fill with purgatives. let them confiscate your food. you know they gonna grab them from the bin . |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 44411968 United States01/27/2020 06:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I read somewhere a long time ago that pink actually used to be the "baby color" for boys, and that blue used to be the color for girls. Now they are the opposite. Why? Pink encourages "masculine" qualities. Blue calms. So now we have "calm" men and belligerent women - part of the agenda. This article [link to www.thevintagenews.com (secure)] covers some of the history. But it makes no mention of deliberate change to fit in with an agenda ... Quoting: Colour Crusader Not unless you are male and go the Joto Virus from Mexico. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78068745 Otherwise, yes pink is feminine. Really you should try for some sort of independence from other people deciding how much you pay to put a roof over your head. The game is rigged, to be sure, but An RV? Mobile? Fixer-upper? Anything YOU own is better than paying someone else for the privilege of having a place to lay your head. In this one case... It is better to rule in (your own) Hell, than to serve in (someone else's) Heaven. |
| Gr8skott User ID: 77673791 United States01/27/2020 06:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Pink used to be the official color for little boys, and blue for little girls. A specific example of this can be seen in an old trade publication from 1918. According to Smithsonian, the magazine Earnshaw’s Infants’ Department noted “The generally accepted rule is pink for the boys, and blue for the girls”. Interestingly the color coding for our political parties is an even more recent development. [link to www.smithsonianmag.com (secure)] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78360655 United States01/27/2020 06:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78360655 United States01/27/2020 06:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Pink used to be the official color for little boys, and blue for little girls. A specific example of this can be seen in an old trade publication from 1918. According to Smithsonian, the magazine Earnshaw’s Infants’ Department noted “The generally accepted rule is pink for the boys, and blue for the girls”. Interestingly the color coding for our political parties is an even more recent development. [link to www.smithsonianmag.com (secure)] Bullshit. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 76734271 United States01/27/2020 06:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It has more to do with your coloring than your sex. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77197203 Some people look better in pink than others. Probably everyone has a pink that looks somewhat good on them, male or female. There are lots of pinks! Sadly I have noticed that hot white girls that dress all in pink a lot do seem to be the ones that have jungle fever. Which is a shame since white girls look so beautiful and feminine in pink. Those girls in the links you posted are all hot and look very hot in pink and wow Elin Nordegren in the Listal link wow such a beautiful bright pink she's all dressed in. And the dominatrix in the blindingly bright pink outfit, thigh highs, whip and glasses. They would make for such great eyecandy if only they weren't race treasonous mudsh*rks. Such a shame that it seems like all hot white girls that dress all in pink a lot seem to love black men. This poster just keeps repeating this because Caucasians are trying to force interracial sex and dating. They use reverse psychology to make you think they "don't want that" when in reality they're desperate for it. That's why they're so forceful about telling you who they're having sex with, because they're trying to steal N'egroes from each other and take our superior genetics and melanin so they can survive here a bit longer. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 76734271 United States01/27/2020 06:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The reason this poster and that other guy, "red john" or whatever, are so forceful about who they're having sex with (black women) is because they're trying to force us to accept them sexually so they can get access to our superior genetic codes. They use psychological tricks to catch us off guard and basically mentally rape us so that physically there is less resistance. Why go through all the trouble? Because Caucasians have horrible genetics from millennia of fucking animals, family members and Neanderthals who were also highly inbred. This completely weakened their genetic profile, which manifests itself in weak bodies, ugliness, stupidity and other 'below average' traits. This is why who you sleep with is important, over time it affects the whole race. Caucasians with their weak, heavily damaged genes are not physically fit or attractive. They're also such snowflakes that they keep deleting this information, probably because they don't want people to know how genetically damage they all are. They have to try 10 times as hard to look half as good. Especially the women. That's why they spend so much time lying and saying they're the most attractive, everyone wants them and all that jazz. They're trying to manipulate the sexual marketplace so people don't realize how low their SMV really is. That's why money is so important to them and they make everything about money. So they can actually compete at something for once! These horrible traits manifest in ugliness and terrible, arrogant personalities with nothing to back them up. Eventually this turns into violence when they are confronted with the truth that they are weak and ineffectual. So they try to artificially create that violence like a civil war so they can justify further theft of land and social status. [link to www.foxnews.com (secure)] White Americans are both genetically weaker and less diverse than their black compatriots, a Cornell University-led study finds. Quoting: Analyzing the genetic makeup of 20 Americans of European ancestry and 15 African-Americans, researchers found that the former showed much less variation among 10,000 tested genes than did the latter, which was expected. They also found that Europeans had many more possibly harmful mutations than did African, which was a surprise. "Since we tend to think of European populations as quite large, we did not expect to see a significant difference in the distribution of neutral and deleterious variation between the two populations," said senior co-author Carlos Bustamante, an assistant professor of biological statistics and computational biology at Cornell. It's been known for years that all non-Africans are descended from a small group, perhaps only a few dozen individuals, who left the continent between 50,000 and 100,000 years ago. But the Cornell study, published in the journal Nature Thursday, indicates that Europeans went through a second "population bottleneck," probably about 30,000 years ago, when the ancestral population was again reduced to relatively few in number. [link to www.nbcnews.com (secure)] A scan of all the mutations in the human gene map shows something surprising – people of European descent are evolving fast, and not for the better. Quoting: actual research scumbagThe study finds that in the past 5,000 years, European-Americans have developed a HUGE batch of potentially harmful genetic mutations – many more than African-Americans. The study, published in the journal Nature, may help explain why so many people develop diseases even though they don’t have common genetic mutations. It can also help explain why different people have so many different reactions to the same drug, said Joshua Akey of the University of Washington in Seattle who led the study. “The things that allowed us to go from millions to billions of has also been the same process that has been pumping in all these new mutations.” Akey and colleagues at genetics institutions across the country examined the gene sequences of more than 6,500 people – more than 4,200 European-Americans and 2,200 African-Americans. They were looking for small changes in the genetic code called single nucleotide variants – one-letter differences in the genetic code of A,C, T and G. They found “an enormous excess of rare variants” in the European-Americans. And 73 percent of these mutations only appeared in the human genome in the past 5,000 to 10,000 years. Most were mutations that are known to weaken proteins, Akey said, and most of these harmful mutations were also in the people of European descent. There may even be more evolution in the future, Akey predicted. One example – phenylketonuria or PKU. It’s caused by a mutation in a gene that breaks down an amino acid called phenylalanine. People with PKU mutations must eat a strict, low-protein diet or they can develop seizures and mental retardation. Now newborns are routinely tested for PKU so they can start the diet immediately and avoid any brain damage. Akey said because these kids can now grow up and lead normal lives, they will likely start having children and the gene may become more common in the population. [link to evolution.berkeley.edu (secure)] Population bottlenecks occur when a population's size is reduced for at least one generation. Because genetic drift acts more quickly to reduce genetic variation in small populations, undergoing a bottleneck can reduce a population's genetic variation by a lot, even if the bottleneck doesn't last for very many generations. This is illustrated by the bags of marbles shown below, where, in generation 2, an unusually small draw creates a bottleneck. Quoting: science you fucking moronLoss of genetic variation as a result of a population bottleneck Reduced genetic variation means that the population may not be able to adapt to new selection pressures, such as climatic change or a shift in available resources, because the genetic variation that selection would act on may have already drifted out of the population. New genomic data suggests that when Europeans emerged from the last ice age they were close to becoming extinct. Quoting: EU ADNABIOARC projectIn some cases, small bands of potentially as few as 20 to 30 people could have been moving over very large areas, over the whole of Europe as a single territory, according to Professor Ron Pinhasi, principal investigator on the EU-funded ADNABIOARC project. This demographic model is based on new evidence that suggests populations were much smaller than is generally thought to be a stable size for healthy reproduction, usually around 500 people. Such small groupings may have led to reduced fitness and even extinctions. ‘As an archaeologist and anthropologist, I was quite shocked to see how limited, how small the population numbers were. You know, shockingly small,’ said Prof. Pinhasi, based at University College Dublin, Ireland. ‘I think that what happened, it’s on a catastrophic level of demography for a long time in human evolution,’ he said. The impacts of this are significant for understanding the origins of many Europeans today, as it is forcing researchers to reconsider models of human expansion and colonisation of the continent, as well as our genetic ancestry. By analysing the genomes of human remains, the researchers are able to gather demographic data and clues to potential population sizes. Prof. Pinhasi’s team has found that the genomes sequenced from hunter-gatherers from Hungary and Switzerland between 14 000 to 7 500 years ago are very close to specimens from Denmark or Sweden from the same period. These findings suggest that genetic diversity between inhabitants of most of western and central Europe after the ice age was very limited, indicating a major demographic bottleneck triggered by human isolation and extinction during the ice age. ‘You see a real reduction in population numbers and diversity, so you see the few lineages that probably split or separated before the ice age, and then stayed isolated during the ice age,’ he said. ‘Some time after the ice age, they kind of re-emerge, or disperse, and get together, as we see new contributions to European lineages from Asia and in particular the Near East.’ Do you see that? When a single generation of genetic bottlenecks is enough to permanently damage your genes, YOUR PEOPLE BARELY SURVIVED THOUSANDS OF YEARS OF THAT. You are genetically doomed and you know this which is why you use 'good cop bad cop' to lie about us and make it easier to catch us off guard and sexually poach us like a bunch OF FUCKING LOSERS! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77589445  Poland01/27/2020 06:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Men wearing pink look gay as fuck Women wearing all pink, especially all bright pink on the other hand look so super hot, beautiful, and feminine. I would absolutely love white girls wearing super bright pink except for the fact that it seems like white girls that wear all pink, especially all bright pink a lot always seem to be super liberal and love black men, and have black boyfriends or husbands and almost always black kids too. In fact I've never seen a white girl wearing all pink, especially all bright pink that wasn't super liberal and that didn't have a black boyfriend or husband unfortunately. Which is an absolute shame. Since white girls look so hot and feminine in bright pink. I used to get sexually aroused by a white girl wearing all bright pink. Now when I see a girl wearing all bright pink I get prepared to be disgusted thinking yeah she's hot and looks super hot beautiful and feminine in all that bright pink but I'm also 100% sure she's got to be a mudsh*rk since sadly white girls that wear all pink, especially all bright pink always are. And sadly I'm always right. Completely agree on pink for girls, makes you more interested in them, on the other hand pink makes men look weak, picture a criminal walking down the streets wearing pink, is like he isn't even a criminal. Pink is a feminine color. Tell those rappers some girls like to wear pink a lot... see how less women approach them. Scratch that pink is a weak color. I fully agree. And here's a bunch of pictures of Heidi Klum with Seal and dressed all in beautiful bright pink. [link to www.alamy.com (secure)] Damn she looks so fucking hot and feminine and makes for such great eyecandy in all that beautiful blindingly bright pink and such a lovely sight seeing her with Seal well dressed all in bright pink. It'd be so awesome if Heidi and Seal hot back together and she dressed all in bright pink all the time. There is nothing hotter and more beautiful than seeing a hot white girl all dressed in beautiful blindingly bright pink with a black man, especially if they also have black kids too. There's a reason why pink rhymes with stink. Because pink fucking stinks. That's why n*ggerloving white whores love wearing pink so much. Because n*ggers stink and so does pink and of course the white whores that fuck n*ggers stink too. That's why n*ggerloving whores love wearing all pink so much. Because n*ggers, n*ggerloving whores and pink all fucking stink. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77866962 United States01/27/2020 06:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 73817748  Netherlands01/27/2020 06:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Studies show pink is calming and relaxes agitated people Quoting: Theobromine The Deplorable Psychiatrists recommended some prison rooms and psychiatric wards be painted pink They still do it Red on the other hand can excite and cause agitation - usually used for emergency vehicles to ALERT people Hence they have casino's and brothels in red.... |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77357100 Poland01/27/2020 06:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75987930 womaning white women as some on here have pointed out always seem to love bright pink and wearing and owning everything bright pink. Of course when it comes to men they love black of course. womaning white women probably wear all bright pink to let white men know they're mudsh*rks and to stay away from them. I THINK U HAVE ISSUES DUDE. Just speaking the truth. Everybody knows that white girls that wear all pink, especially all bright pink always seem to love black men. No use denying it because it's a fact. learn to proofread. and try to get out of the house more. Kudos to OP for recognizing and admitting a mistake, its a fixable mistake, however. Unlike you, blaming everything else without first educating yourself as to what the fuck you are talking about. I know its easier listening to these retards on tv talking about how bad things are, but do yourself a favor and research things and how they really work. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77357100 Poland01/27/2020 06:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I read somewhere a long time ago that pink actually used to be the "baby color" for boys, and that blue used to be the color for girls. Now they are the opposite. Why? Pink encourages "masculine" qualities. Blue calms. So now we have "calm" men and belligerent women - part of the agenda. This article [link to www.thevintagenews.com (secure)] covers some of the history. But it makes no mention of deliberate change to fit in with an agenda ... Quoting: Colour Crusader Not unless you are male and go the Joto Virus from Mexico. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78068745 Otherwise, yes pink is feminine. Well, CC, actually in ancient roman times the boys wore pink, so its a matter of opinion really. in those times men wore robes dyed in red, and their sons wore pink as a sign of purity, in a way. Oh my, we have another e-thug in our midst. The problem is, the majority of the time people want more than they can afford, thats their mistake. People that work at McDonalds flipping burgers can't expect to easily afford a home either, learn a fucking skilled trade and make more money. Then there are those that are covered up in other debt like credit cards, thats their fault too. People need to clean up their own shit first, then they can bitch. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77357100 Poland01/27/2020 07:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77004649 Russia01/27/2020 07:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I read somewhere a long time ago that pink actually used to be the "baby color" for boys, and that blue used to be the color for girls. Now they are the opposite. Why? Pink encourages "masculine" qualities. Blue calms. So now we have "calm" men and belligerent women - part of the agenda. This article [link to www.thevintagenews.com (secure)] covers some of the history. But it makes no mention of deliberate change to fit in with an agenda ... Quoting: Colour Crusader Not unless you are male and go the Joto Virus from Mexico. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78068745 Otherwise, yes pink is feminine. Well, CC, actually in ancient roman times the boys wore pink, so its a matter of opinion really. in those times men wore robes dyed in red, and their sons wore pink as a sign of purity, in a way. Eeeew! I fucking hate bitches that smoke. Smoking is fucking disgusting. Smokers are the fucking scum of the earth. Smokers should all do the world a favor and just die. Btw here's a funny as hell video of a bitch that smokes getting what she deserves. HAHAHA!! Serves that fucking stupid ugly smoking bitch right. Everybody should do that to every smoker to teach them a fucking lesson. Hopefully she and that bitch you described in your post get cancer and die. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 74760091  France01/28/2020 01:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Haven’t you incels ever seen a pussy? Come on! What the hell has happened to men? Of course pink is a feminine color! Pink definitely is a very feminine color. The only men that would wear pink are gay men. No straight man would wear pink. Women on the other hand look super beautiful sexy and super feminine in all pink, especially all bright pink. Also it seems that it's almost always the hottest girls that wear all bright pink too, which of course makes them even hotter and more feminine. Sadly though it does seem like all white women that I wear all pink, especially all bright pink are always mud*harks. Which is such a shame. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77653305 United States01/28/2020 01:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78390395  Ireland01/29/2020 02:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I read somewhere a long time ago that pink actually used to be the "baby color" for boys, and that blue used to be the color for girls. Now they are the opposite. Why? Pink encourages "masculine" qualities. Blue calms. So now we have "calm" men and belligerent women - part of the agenda. This article [link to www.thevintagenews.com (secure)] covers some of the history. But it makes no mention of deliberate change to fit in with an agenda ... Quoting: Colour Crusader Not unless you are male and go the Joto Virus from Mexico. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78068745 Otherwise, yes pink is feminine. Well, CC, actually in ancient roman times the boys wore pink, so its a matter of opinion really. in those times men wore robes dyed in red, and their sons wore pink as a sign of purity, in a way. Eeeew! I fucking hate bitches that smoke. Smoking is fucking disgusting. Smokers are the fucking scum of the earth. Smokers should all do the world a favor and just die. Btw here's a funny as hell video of a bitch that smokes getting what she deserves. HAHAHA!! Serves that fucking stupid ugly smoking bitch right. Everybody should do that to every smoker to teach them a fucking lesson. Hopefully she and that bitch you described in your post get cancer and die. I know a few locals here traveling to Vegas next week. I live in PODOWN area of KY. If it hits here we are screwed. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 73629768 Russia02/02/2020 02:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75987930 Just speaking the truth. Everybody knows that white girls that wear all pink, especially all bright pink always seem to love black men. No use denying it because it's a fact. learn to proofread. and try to get out of the house more. What's the matter. Truth hurts. I guess you must love white girls that wear all bright pink and had your heart broken because you found out that all love black men. Perhaps you should take it as a sign not to go for white women that wear all pink since they always love black men and don't like white men. Don't worry there's plenty of white women that love white men and don't like black men. Just not any that wear all pink, especially all bright pink. lmao, wtf did i just read?! :sand1: Nice you did. But woman are the last people to understand the law of averages. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 73629768 Russia02/02/2020 02:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Pink, like Yellow, are ugly, unsightly colors that should never be used, unless to warn others. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78376412 Years ago while working at a motel we sold out/no vacancy. Turned the vacancy light off, people still came in asking for rooms. Put a sign on the door in black marker, people would still ring the bell and ask. Tried a few different colors, then said "F it" and used pink. I shit you not, people would walk up, see the sign, and turn around and walk away. All traffic signs should be in pink lettering instead of black. Good point about pink serving as a warning color. That must be why as others have pointed out on here that n*ggerloving white women usually wear all bright pink. Basically they're warning white men "I'm a mudsh*rk so white men avoid me at all costs." About having a no vacancy sign in pink yeah it'd keep away white men and white women that aren't mudsh*rks Though it'd be sure to attract blacks and mudsh*rking white women. So the pink no vacancy sign could backfire on you if there's a lot of blacks mudsh*rks wanting to stay at your motel. You know what- you are right! They really are hot! |
pink power!