Probably a load of hokum, and wastiing our time looking into it, but anyway, here are some things that may or may not be of interest?

[link to i.imgur.com (secure)]
[link to i.imgur.com (secure)]
[link to i.imgur.com (secure)]
[link to i.imgur.com (secure)]
[link to i.imgur.com (secure)]

"Objection 4: This argument allows us to eat humans: All that is required is that one is raised in a cannibalistic tradition.

3. The Taste Argument:

"I love the way meat tastes. I will not deprive myself of this pleasant sensation. Therefore, I should be able to eat meat."

Objection 1: This argument allows us to eat humans: That is, it leaves open the possibility that a person can say, "I love the way human meat tastes. There's nothing that tastes quite like a human!" This principle (something's tasting good) is not something that one would want to be true in general and is something that does not justify the current treatment of animals - this principle could be an argument to eat anything and treat the being/thing (i.e., eatee) as badly as you like." [link to www.mesacc.edu (secure)]