the Historical Biblical narrative is supported by outside sources

There is very much historical evidence

THE OTHER SIDE DOES NOT WANT YOU TO SEE

The bible may have been put together by enki and enlil and crew, but Christian's ignore everything before hebrew
lulu amelu

Thank you.

What do you mean with "the other side?"

If you've read the back of the book,
you know how this story ends.
(and it will be beyond GLORIOUS
for the children of God)
For those who reject the Lord,
it would be better for them to have
never been born at all.

the evidence is there

FOR THOSE WHO WANT THE TRUTH

As Pilate sed...

What is truth?

That which there is historical evidence

happened

ITS TRUTH

Silly Habiru.

BTW, interesting to see the politics, some of the text is kind of psycho. Looks like the Canaanites where killing one another, before the Habiru where f'ing their shit up, and the city of Shechem allied with the Habiru*.


Amusingly, they said "if you send archers the land will remain, no archers and the land will be lost". Incidentally, I don't remember the Canaanites having archers in any of the old stories.


Bleh, can't find the link where part of the text was obsessed with the number 7 in a psycho way. Could of been because of the whole Jericho thing...


*Some sources indicate that they where just "people from the countryside", while other sources indicate the term means slaves/bandits and etc. The first could be a form of academic gaslighting, the second would fit with how the Egyptians and Canaanites would view the Israelite's.

[link to mindrenewers.com (secure)]

The real state of things.

Let it be !