|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
What is the main reason so many do not believe in a Creator...and choose evolution?
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Coward |
|
Post Content
|
...Conjecture, pragmatism and bullshit. We know what you believe to be true, do not worry, we all know and we have very good reasons not to believe this to be true. Cheers  Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77762685 I don't think you do. After all this time, can you tell me why most scientists accept evolution? It's been explained to you over and over. Do you know what the theory says, and what accurate predictions it makes? Why don't you think that a scientific theory that makes accurate predictions should be considered invalid? Can you propose an alternative theory that has equal predictive power? Most scientists accept evolution because they will lose their jobs, funding and credibility if they dont. Just like Flew when he abandoned his ideas. I mean your attitude towards this topic already clearly reflects the credibility part of my argument. It is just a matter of time for you to change your mind when a new and trendy consensus comes along. My alternative theory is that either everything was created and yours is everything created itself. The main difference is, when I point out lets say a feather and show you complexity, functionality and ingenuity, my explanation will start out with a mind/creator and yours will start out with 'nature/time/dont know/no creator' did it.
Complete baseless claim. Usually what happens is exactly the opposite. My alternative theory is that either everything was created and yours is everything created itself.Its abundantly clear that you are NOT graduated. Therefore, thinks that a scientific theory is the same as a hunch or hypothesis. The main difference is, when I point out lets say a feather and show you complexity, functionality and ingenuity, my explanation will start out with a mind/creator and yours will start out with 'nature/time/dont know/no creator' did it.The main difference is that you know nothing about science. It starts with observation, then evidence is collected, then evidence is tested and this cycle repeats to the exaustion. Sometimes for many decades. When there is a sufficient body of evidence(overwhelming evidence) then it can maybe become a theory. What you want to do is, start with an observation, insert a baseless and evidenceless claim and expect that everyone accepts it because that's how you think science works. It is not. Are you high on something? Going against any flow results exactly in what i have stated. Outcasts, rebels and the likes will always be removed for their mere ideas are a hinderance to idiots, no offense.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
