Harvard suggests elevating 127 NEIGHBORHOODS in DC to statehood to force a Dem mega-majority and restructure the entire gov to their benefit

"While a step in the right direction, these proposals are inadequate. To create a system where every vote counts equally, the Constitution must be amended. To do this, Congress should pass legislation reducing the size of Washington, D.C., to an area encompassing only a few core federal buildings and then admit the rest of the District’s 127 neighborhoods as states. These states — which could be added with a simple congressional majority — would add enough votes in Congress to ratify four amendments: (1) a transfer of the Senate’s power to a body that represents citizens equally; (2) an expansion of the House so that all citizens are represented in equal-sized districts; (3) a replacement of the Electoral College with a popular vote; and (4) a modification of the Constitution’s amendment process that would ensure future amendments are ratified by states representing most Americans."

Admittance to statehood only requires a simply majority hence why adding new states is the first step. Then they get the super majority to change anything they want.

Wow, not even one reply. Thought this kind of thing is right up GLP's alley...

These people really believe they are royalty of some kind and that we should bow to their "higher intellect". We fought the first revolution against these same thoughts and these same type of people.

So a Harvard degree really means you're retarded.

There's a huge difference between stupid and being devious. This is clearly the latter. Don't underestimate your enemies!!

link doesn't work, OP

Wow, no wonder I got no replies, lol.

I just checked the main Harvard Law Review website and all their articles are getting the same errors. Here's a 3rd party article:

[link to www.washingtonian.com (secure)]

No, I meant what was posted.
They actually think they will live after their power grab attempt?

Truly retarded.

That's a grand imagination the unnamed author has.

Good thing that Harvard wannabe think tanks don't make laws.

i guess they teach potato politics in harvard.

That one sucked. Here's one that is better:

[link to dakotafreepress.com (secure)]

They're definitely influential though. Obama was a member of the Harvard Law Review. Was the head of the organization even for a while.

[link to www.nytimes.com (secure)]

The academics should turn their anal vibratos down a bit--it might help with reading comprehension.

The USA had temporary "capital" locations until the matter could be fully addressed. There was never any intent, or tolerance for the idea that the nations capital would be part of any State.

The location for Washington, District of Columbia was finally settled on. The State of Maryland donated the land for the new capital. The only stipulation Maryland demanded was that if the nations capital was ever moved, the DC area would revert back to Maryland's control. I do not recall any other stipulations.

Many years ago Jesse Jackson was agitating for statehood for DC. I do not recall if the real reason for squashing this stupid and illegal idea came up. The pubic discussion revolved around how it could support itself. The DC State morans said it could be funded by everyone paying for access to the various government facilities. That is obscene.

Jackson is not a retard like Al Sharpton, but e is still not very bright.

The Harvard pukes need to pause the anal sex for a while and come up for air.

Read post #2. The plan is to reduce the Washington DC capitol down to only the essential federal buildings and then the rest can be converted to states, one per freakin neighborhood.