Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,444 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 367,950
Pageviews Today: 577,960Threads Today: 216Posts Today: 3,538
06:27 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Repeal of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act

 
RepublicofTexas
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 75014501
United States
01/19/2020 02:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Repeal of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act
The law, which was enacted in 1996 as part of the Communications Decency Act, gives websites like Facebook, YouTube and Twitter broad legal immunity -- essentially, it eliminates the possibility of legal consequences over what their users post. The statute was created to protect free speech on the internet.

The Democrats and Biden need another source of free money with the collapse of the Ukraine foreign aid fraud.


[link to www.foxbusiness.com (secure)]
Make America Strong Again
Make America Sexy Again

I'm fukken this monkey, you just shut up and hold the tail."
Scamdemic Coronahoax

User ID: 78089149
United States
12/02/2020 04:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Repeal of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act
I imagine a lot of complaints to a brand new federal department office building with thousands of workers verifying claims and mailing out cease and desist orders for post by X user on X date at X webpage for hate speech, etc., and every website hiring new managers to monitor all content 24/7, and lots more problems and places shutting down.

Section 230 is good. Trump seems to want revenge on Twitter, I don't see any other reason for repealing 230.

The problem seems to be that there is no liability anywhere. Anyone can say anything and it's up to a website to determine how it will regulate, monitor and enforce its own rules.

Twitter does not seem to censor or add disclaimers to every user therefore it is targeting it's users who it does and there should be a punishment upon Twitter for it because they cannot do it unbiasedly. In essence their censoring and disclaimers can right now be considered hate speech and Trump need not seek to repeal section 230 and just make a huge mess.
God is Jesus.





GLP