REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
Message Subject
|
COVID* STANDFORD MASK STUDY---Elsevier journal to retract widely debunked masks study whose author claimed a Stanford affiliation p345
|
Poster Handle
|
KeepingItReal |
Post Content
|
So now they're including numbers from people that weren't tested but were diagnosed clinically. That means that up until now the deaths reported were based only on patients that tested positive, not the ones that just got sick and died without being tested or that were diagnosed by clinical observation only. This would account for the discrepancy between numbers of dead reported and the activity at crematoriums that suggest a much higher number of dead. Why are they changing the way they classify the infected, sick and dead now after a more than a month of under reporting the numbers? Do they know that it's a matter of time before we have serious outbreaks outside of China and they are trying to save a bit of face? And now we have reports that people can go as much as 24 days without symptoms, while infecting family and strangers.
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|