This is so vague. There are so many threads referring to "they" and "he" and "him" and a little less often there's also a "she".
From many times asking the best I've gotten answered so far is that someone(s) on this site is forming (formed) an "egregore", which makes sense that the posts are usually using collectivistic phrasing.
What does this accomplish?
Who decides which general pronoun reference is relative to the reader?
Has anyone yet addressed the issue that using the internet for interfacing mass consciousness includes electromagnetic interference? Isn't the risk towards negative intent that much greater?
Quoting: Cothesis I'll give you the apparent answer in a nutshell.
It's all bullshit.
They don't know what he wants and they don't care anyway, because they can't give him what he wants. They'd talk to him but they don't have to, there's no need for any communication at all between either party. Besides it's not like he has anything to say to them or they him.
Everything was finalized a long time ago.
But some people think they can sell something or someone on the idea that something needs to be done. They're hoping they'll make some money by stirring the waters and convince either party of a need to be fulfilled by the people talking in these threads.
They don't realize their chance to capitalize on the mess ended a long time ago, but they're desperate to ingratiate themselves to anyone involved because otherwise they'd live lives of impoverished misery compared to a life of luxury by being valuable.
IF you know a rich and powerful person, you'd want them to want something from you. In this case nobody wants anything from anyone and the chance to be friends with privileged people is long gone.
Still some desperate people seek favor among the powerful, like a drug addict seeking to be favored by a drug lord.
When you think about it, it's actually quite sad that people would debase themselves with such woeful attempts. When their efforts at legitimate work would be more amply rewarded.