Atack Iran 21/9 Free Speech Info

#2 FROM ABOVE

Will the U.S. Attack Iran Before September 21? - Are CIA Front Companies
Investing $4.5 Billion to Profit from attacking Iran?

By Michael E. Salla, Ph.D.

There has been much recent speculation that the Bush administration is about
to authorize a massive preemptive aerial assault against Iran. According to
Alexis Debat, a national security expert, the Pentagon has prepared for
airstrikes against 1,200 targets in Iran that would in three days destroy
Iran's military infrastructure
( [link to www.timesonline.co.uk] ). Such
an assault has been long in preparation and was recently fully completed
according to a Navy whistleblower currently serving on a U.S. aircraft
carrier. The whistleblower, a female officer, said that "all the targets
have been chosen, prioritized, and tasked to specific aircraft, bases,
carriers, missile cruisers and so forth" (see: [link to rense.]
com/general78/we.htm ). Asked why she
would risk her career to disclose such sensitive information, she replied
that most Naval officers are opposed to the strike but are ignored by more
senior officials and the Bush administration.

What gives these reports of an imminent attack against Iran greater
credibility is an August 2007 purchases of almost 4.5 billion dollars in
particular type of stock called 'put options' and 'call options' which are
based on a dramatic shift in the U.S. stock market (see: [link to dont_use_this.]
com/yw8q4f ). Essentially, a "put option" is
where an investor speculates that the market will drop dramatically, say
30-50%, whereas a "call option" is where the investor bets particular stocks
will rise just as dramatically. If the stock fails to dramatically shift
either up or down by September 21, then the investors stand to lose much
from their investment. Such an investment is very unusual and has many
market analysts puzzled as to why someone would risk such a large sum unless
they had some insider information.

A similar stock market event happened in the weeks before 911 when anonymous
investors made great profits when they successfully 'predicted' a dramatic
drop in airline and insurances stocks, while also 'predicting' dramatic
increases in stocks of corporations producing military armaments (see:
[link to 911research.]
wtc7.net/sept11/stockputs.html ). The investments were so suspicious that
they became subject to an insider trading investigation by U.S. Securities
Exchange Commission (SEC) but the no one was ever identified or charged.
This was despite a determined effort by the SEC to find who was behind the
mysterious investments.

The parallels with 'put" and "call option" purchases just before 911 has led
to much speculation that the recent $4.5 billion investment is based on
insider knowledge of another 911 event before September 21. This has led to
speculation that a catastrophic event is about to occur in the U.S. Another
explanation for a dramatic shift in the stock market is that China will
desert the US currency leading to a collapse in the US dollar. Both
explanations would essentially lead to a collapse in some U.S. stocks, while
other stocks would rise.

A more plausible explanation for the mysterious billion dollar investments
is that hidden investors have insider knowledge that an attack against Iran
will occur before September 21. If an attack occurred along the scale
described by emerging reports, then the U.S. stock market would collapse as
oil prices escalated dramatically. This would spark a global recession, and
cause great hardship to many Americans who would find their investments and
jobs at risk.

It is very likely that the planned massive aerial attack against Iran's
military infrastructure and underground nuclear facilities will use bunker
busting nuclear weapons. The question is, what can be done to prevent a
preemptive military attack on Iran that may use tactical nuclear weapons to
destroy its nuclear facilities?

In 2006, a similar effort to stage a preemptive nuclear strike against Iran
was prevented by a revolt of the generals. According to Seymour Hersh:

"In late April, the military leadership, headed by General Pace, achieved a
major victory when the White House dropped its insistence that the plan for
a bombing campaign include the possible use of a nuclear device to destroy
Iran's uranium-enrichment plant at Natanz, nearly two hundred miles south of
Tehran. . "Bush and Cheney were dead serious about the nuclear planning,"
the former senior intelligence official told me. "And Pace stood up to them.
Then the world came back: 'O.K., the nuclear option is politically
unacceptable.' " [link to www.newyorke]

r.com/archive/2006/07/10/060710fa_fact .

It may be significant that General Peter Pace was not reappointed as
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Pace was opposed to a nuclear strike
against Iran. Was he not reappointed in order to clear the decks for a more
permissive environment within the Joint Chiefs of Staff for an attack that
could use tactical nuclear weapons? It appears so given the coincidence of
reports of an imminent attack and purchase of $4.5 billion in stock options
predicting a collapse in the US stock market.

The current military plans available to the public mention only conventional
munitions but it is more likely that some tactical nuclear weapons will be
used to take out Iran's deeply buried nuclear facilities. The effect of
tactical nuclear weapons to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities would be
devastating. Radioactive contamination would disperse widely affecting the
health of many. At the same time, Iran's military and much of its civilian
infrastructure would be destroyed by conventional munitions. This would
restrict Iran's abilities to cope with the health and humanitarian impact of
the use of nuclear weapons, and destruction of nuclear facilities.

The question to be asked is "who are the hidden investors with insider
knowledge that can gain them billions in short term profits?" This answer
will give an important clue to the long term agenda being played out, and
the actors involved. In the case of 911, similar investors were able to
evade detection from an official investigation by the U.S. Securities
Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC launched an unprecedented investigation
that deputized "hundreds, if not thousands, of key players in the private
sector" (see: [link to 911research.]

wtc7.net/sept11/stockputs.html ). According to a former Los Angeles Police
Officer, Michael Ruppert, what effectively happens when individuals are
deputized is that they are sworn to secrecy on national security grounds.
This was a very effective way of keeping secret what was discovered in the
SEC investigation. What kind of investor would have the power to subvert an
SEC investigation in this manner? The most likely answer is the CIA.

CIA front companies annually supply funds for a black budget used to fund
covert national security projects . The black budget has been estimated to
range between 1.0 to 1.7 trillion dollars annually which is funneled through
the CIA to various military-corporate entities fulfilling such projects
(see: [link to www.scoop] .
co.nz/stories/HL0401/S00151.htm ). The massive size of the black budget is
needed to fund a second Manhattan Project - projects related to technologies
so advanced that many claim them to be extraterrestrial in origin. Credible
whistleblowers have come forward to claim the existence of such technologies
and of a high level government cover up of extraterrestrial life (see:
www.disclosureproje ct.com ). They claim
that most Congressional officials are not briefed on extraterrestrial
related projects due to national security concerns. Consequently, Congress
is not aware of or permit appropriations for a second Manhattan Project,
funds therefore need to be generated in alternative ways.

The CIA is able to perform this function of secretly raising revenue through
the 1949 CIA Act which authorizes the CIA to expend funds "without regard to
any provisions of law". The CIA therefore does not have to follow any legal
requirements for the funds it procures from various sources, and funnels to
military-corporate entities directly responsible for the second Manhattan
project.

There needs to be public opposition to a preemptive military attack against
Iran, and exposure of the underlying agenda behind it and those intending to
profit from it. An informed public is the best safeguard against unwarranted
abuses of executive power such as a preemptive attack against Iran that does
not have the support of the American people or Congress. In addition to
raising public awareness, it will be very helpful for individuals to project
thoughts of peace and goodwill to the Middle East, and especially to Iran.
The Princeton Project on Global Conscious Project at Princeton University
has demonstrated the effect of large numbers of people placing their
attention in ways that can impact on global events (see: [link to noosphere.]
princeton.edu/ ). If millions of people
could project a positive vision of peace and harmony to Iran and U.S.
military forces in the region, then such a preemptive attack may be
prevented.

The period leading up to September 21 will be critical for the whole planet
as the signs are all too evident that a preemptive attack against Iran,
almost certainly involving nuclear weapons, is imminent. The humanitarian
cost in terms of possible radioactive fallout, and casualties from the
destruction of Iran's military and much of its civilian infrastructure may
be catastrophic for the Persian Gulf region. Furthermore, the U.S. and
global economy will go into a deep free fall in the event of dramatic
increases in oil prices and further instability in the Middle East. Out of
this looming tragedy, investors with possible CIA connections and insider
knowledge, plan to profit in ways that may be used to secretly fund a second
Manhattan Project.

Michael E. Salla, Ph.D

Kona, Hawaii

09/04/07

www.Exopolitics. Org


--
[link to cosmogenesis21122012.blogspot.com]

[link to people.tribe.net]