Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,255 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 459,636
Pageviews Today: 1,136,806Threads Today: 502Posts Today: 10,225
03:21 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

The Great SPANISH FLU Hoax & Myth- 1918 Study proves Spanish FLU was NOT the result of a contagious airborne virus; history repeats with corona

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78863940
05/01/2020 10:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
The Great SPANISH FLU Hoax & Myth- 1918 Study proves Spanish FLU was NOT the result of a contagious airborne virus; history repeats with corona
This is a history lesson.

The following studies prove that the Spanish Flu was another great Hoax perpetuated on the people of the world. A coverup, if you will, of the true cause of illness.

The Spanish Flu was not the result of communicable, pathogenic, airborne disease at all, but rather a combination of vaccine damage (Mass Vaccine campaigns were underway globally after World War I) and the result of massive radar operations by the Navy, resulting in electrical interference that disturbed the naturally occurring Shumann resonance (around 7.8 HZ) that the body needs to maintain homeostasis.

Schumann Resonance:



For more information, please read 'The Electric Rainbow'. An excellent book on this subject.

Here is a video summary of the following information, if you're not inclined to read:



book



------------------------------------------

THE SPANISH FLU 'CONTAGION' EXPERIMENTS FAILED MISERABLY


The US Navy performed experiments on 'volunteers' in 1918, attempting to induce illness by exposing them to sick patients with Influenza. All of the experiments failed miserably, proving the virus was NOT the result of a communicable 'virus' at all.

Dr. Rosenau and the US Navy performed the experiment on 100 Sailors, attempting to induce illness in them by aerosolising 'infected' tissue and spraying them, swabbing people's noses with flem from the infected, and even giving them EYEDROP of the 'virus' collected from the infected patients mucus and blood. At one point, they even had the infected cough directly into the volunteers mouth.

A quote from a Study: :book:

Perhaps the most interesting epidemiological studies conducted during the 1918–1919 pandemic were the human experiments conducted by the Public Health Service and the U.S. Navy under the supervision of Milton Rosenau on Gallops Island, the quarantine station in Boston Harbor, and on Angel Island, its counterpart in San Francisco.

The experiment began with 100 volunteers from the Navy who had no history of influenza. Rosenau was the first to report on the experiments conducted at Gallops Island in November and December 1918.69 His first volunteers received first one strain and then several strains of Pfeiffer's bacillus by spray and swab into their noses and throats and then into their eyes. When that procedure failed to produce disease, others were inoculated with mixtures of other organisms isolated from the throats and noses of influenza patients. Next, some volunteers received injections of blood from influenza patients.

Finally, 13 of the volunteers were taken into an influenza ward and exposed to 10 influenza patients each. Each volunteer was to shake hands with each patient, to talk with him at close range, and to permit him to cough directly into his face.

None of the volunteers in these experiments developed influenza.

wtf

He ended his article in JAMA with a telling acknowledgement: “We entered the outbreak with a notion that we knew the cause of the disease, and were quite sure we knew how it was transmitted from person to person. Perhaps, if we have learned anything, it is that we are not quite sure what we know about the disease.”69 (p. 313)


[link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (secure)]

AWKWARD! the virus hunters of old, as well as those today, can't prove these 'viruses' induce illness. Starting to see why you're not taught proper history?
eekalert

Here's the original experiment journal of Dr. Rosenau and the US Navy, and their work on 100 Sailors, you can read it in full here:

[link to jamanetwork.com (secure)]


If you don't understand History, you're doomed to repeat it!

There was no communicable virus then, just as there is no communicable virus now. There are only toxins that the body reacts to making you sick. This can occur from manufacturing, vaccines, food poisoning, poor water quality, electrical interference, and a host of manifold incongruent factors that make the body ill. What they're calling a 'virus' is the bodies attempt to heal itself.

This is why today's scientists can't seem to isolate the SARS-2 Corona virus, and only have its 'virion' RNA protein particles; they have never properly separated it from a sample or observed it attacking cells and replicating in a laboratory, let alone via air, because they can't.

The scientists don't have the virus shell en toto, rather they claim they have a 'piece' of protein that came from it, and can only find unproven, uncorrelated 'antibodies' they claim came after the virus. Are you seeing a pattern? Where is the actual virus?

All 'studies' being posited as 'proof of virus' use a fallacious, 80% false-positive, PCR test to 'prove' the virus has spread. The PCR is ubiquitously known for its errors. The virologists have never been able to induce symptoms in a subject by direct transference of these 'virion' particles, since they are in truth, the body producing exosomes to heal itself.

coffee4

PROBLEMS WITH CORONA STUDIES:

The 'airborn' study performed in China didn't use a control, and only took a tissue sample of a patient, sprayed it onto an object, and waited three hours for it to die. Yet, no CONTROL with a similar blood sample that could prove this was unique to the virus was used, and absolutely zero true experimentation to show it was pathogenic was performed.

In these studies, no electron microscope was used to isolate and observe the virus, they only decided to use one after they 'recreated' the virus with a PCR Polymerase reaction, which alters the sample. Essentially, they had to 'rebuilt' a Frankenstein protein with a machine and computer model, and then claim they observed it in an eleectron microscope. This is not how science works.

Unfortunately, the studies for this corona virus are not worth the computers they were typed on, just as they were useless for the Spanish Flu of 1918. The modern studies fail to isolate via centrifuge, and simply mix a tissue a non isolated sample with lab fluids and antiobiotics, which produce exosomes of their own accord after antibiotic contact. This is why they will never use a control in these studies, because it would prove that any sample could create 'virus particles'.

agent

To top it off, these studies again use the fallacious PCR test to 'prove' the virus spread into monkey Vero cells, while never properly isolating the virus! Again, the PCR is not a proper metric, as I will prove below. These virologists have never seen the virus with an electron microscope and observed it multiplying. In fact, generally they're only doing the experiment with computer models, or 'rebuilding' the sample via RT-PCR, which is fallacious metric since they aren't working with the original sample.

Therefore it is impossible to claim the virus is pathogenic.

A lesson on PCR testing:

A PCR test was built for DNA polymerase reaction, it essentially makes copies of DNA, was not built for RNA, and absolutely should NOT be used for detection of a virus according to its inventor. Indeed, Kerry Mullis, the inventor of PCR, said this very thing, and eschewed its use for 'virus' detection.

book

RT PCR claims its amplification method using fluorescence to highlight pathogen population can pin down the number to a single molecule.

However, the test results are off by a factor > 3, as for example if a particular pathogen load is tallied at 80000 the actual number could be 20000 or lesser. Besides, to begin with, one should know the baseline fluorescence number of the of the pathogen in the primary isolate before amplification cycles can begin.

Prior to RT-PCR, the initial steps would entail confirmation of the pathogen from electron microscopy and isolation of pure sample of the germ from alleged diseased tissue. Nothing is definitive about the quantification. It’s primarily mathematical fudge and human subjectivity.

As for the RT-PCR qualitatively identifying specific DNA sequences of the pathogen (in this case, SARSCoV-2 RNA virus) in the primary isolate under scrutiny..the claim is fraught with several limitations like contaminants, cross pathogen activity, pathogen debris, human cellular material, number of cycles, primary and secondary reactive test isolate, fallibility of human judgement etc. There is no simple 'positive or negative' in a PCR test.

As for talking in terms of symptomatic, asymptomatic, positives, negatives, false negatives and false positives via PCR is nonsense and ambiguity. You're either sick, or you're not. Logic alone should tell you that if 1000 people have the 'virus', and only 1 of them is sick, then what they're claiming is a pathogenic virus is NOT the cause of illness.


Conclusion: Spanish Flu And Corona Bologna Hoaxes- BUSTED

explosionTank
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78864073
Canada
05/01/2020 10:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great SPANISH FLU Hoax & Myth- 1918 Study proves Spanish FLU was NOT the result of a contagious airborne virus; history repeats with corona
We should get 100 volunteers and do the same thing now
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 78863940
05/01/2020 10:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great SPANISH FLU Hoax & Myth- 1918 Study proves Spanish FLU was NOT the result of a contagious airborne virus; history repeats with corona
We should get 100 volunteers and do the same thing now
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78864073


I would gladly volunteer if they paid me. I know there is no communicable virus, the science proves it.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 75510169
United States
05/01/2020 10:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great SPANISH FLU Hoax & Myth- 1918 Study proves Spanish FLU was NOT the result of a contagious airborne virus; history repeats with corona
This is a history lesson.

The following studies prove that the Spanish Flu was another great Hoax perpetuated on the people of the world. A coverup, if you will, of the true cause of illness.

The Spanish Flu was not the result of communicable, pathogenic, airborne disease at all, but rather a combination of vaccine damage (Mass Vaccine campaigns were underway globally after World War I) and the result of massive radar operations by the Navy, resulting in electrical interference that disturbed the naturally occurring Shumann resonance (around 7.8 HZ) that the body needs to maintain homeostasis.

Schumann Resonance:



For more information, please read 'The Electric Rainbow'. An excellent book on this subject.

Here is a video summary of the following information, if you're not inclined to read:



book



------------------------------------------

THE SPANISH FLU 'CONTAGION' EXPERIMENTS FAILED MISERABLY


The US Navy performed experiments on 'volunteers' in 1918, attempting to induce illness by exposing them to sick patients with Influenza. All of the experiments failed miserably, proving the virus was NOT the result of a communicable 'virus' at all.

Dr. Rosenau and the US Navy performed the experiment on 100 Sailors, attempting to induce illness in them by aerosolising 'infected' tissue and spraying them, swabbing people's noses with flem from the infected, and even giving them EYEDROP of the 'virus' collected from the infected patients mucus and blood. At one point, they even had the infected cough directly into the volunteers mouth.

A quote from a Study: :book:

Perhaps the most interesting epidemiological studies conducted during the 1918–1919 pandemic were the human experiments conducted by the Public Health Service and the U.S. Navy under the supervision of Milton Rosenau on Gallops Island, the quarantine station in Boston Harbor, and on Angel Island, its counterpart in San Francisco.

The experiment began with 100 volunteers from the Navy who had no history of influenza. Rosenau was the first to report on the experiments conducted at Gallops Island in November and December 1918.69 His first volunteers received first one strain and then several strains of Pfeiffer's bacillus by spray and swab into their noses and throats and then into their eyes. When that procedure failed to produce disease, others were inoculated with mixtures of other organisms isolated from the throats and noses of influenza patients. Next, some volunteers received injections of blood from influenza patients.

Finally, 13 of the volunteers were taken into an influenza ward and exposed to 10 influenza patients each. Each volunteer was to shake hands with each patient, to talk with him at close range, and to permit him to cough directly into his face.

None of the volunteers in these experiments developed influenza.

wtf

He ended his article in JAMA with a telling acknowledgement: “We entered the outbreak with a notion that we knew the cause of the disease, and were quite sure we knew how it was transmitted from person to person. Perhaps, if we have learned anything, it is that we are not quite sure what we know about the disease.”69 (p. 313)


[link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (secure)]

AWKWARD! the virus hunters of old, as well as those today, can't prove these 'viruses' induce illness. Starting to see why you're not taught proper history?
eekalert

Here's the original experiment journal of Dr. Rosenau and the US Navy, and their work on 100 Sailors, you can read it in full here:

[link to jamanetwork.com (secure)]


If you don't understand History, you're doomed to repeat it!

There was no communicable virus then, just as there is no communicable virus now. There are only toxins that the body reacts to making you sick. This can occur from manufacturing, vaccines, food poisoning, poor water quality, electrical interference, and a host of manifold incongruent factors that make the body ill. What they're calling a 'virus' is the bodies attempt to heal itself.

This is why today's scientists can't seem to isolate the SARS-2 Corona virus, and only have its 'virion' RNA protein particles; they have never properly separated it from a sample or observed it attacking cells and replicating in a laboratory, let alone via air, because they can't.

The scientists don't have the virus shell en toto, rather they claim they have a 'piece' of protein that came from it, and can only find unproven, uncorrelated 'antibodies' they claim came after the virus. Are you seeing a pattern? Where is the actual virus?

All 'studies' being posited as 'proof of virus' use a fallacious, 80% false-positive, PCR test to 'prove' the virus has spread. The PCR is ubiquitously known for its errors. The virologists have never been able to induce symptoms in a subject by direct transference of these 'virion' particles, since they are in truth, the body producing exosomes to heal itself.

coffee4

PROBLEMS WITH CORONA STUDIES:

The 'airborn' study performed in China didn't use a control, and only took a tissue sample of a patient, sprayed it onto an object, and waited three hours for it to die. Yet, no CONTROL with a similar blood sample that could prove this was unique to the virus was used, and absolutely zero true experimentation to show it was pathogenic was performed.

In these studies, no electron microscope was used to isolate and observe the virus, they only decided to use one after they 'recreated' the virus with a PCR Polymerase reaction, which alters the sample. Essentially, they had to 'rebuilt' a Frankenstein protein with a machine and computer model, and then claim they observed it in an eleectron microscope. This is not how science works.

Unfortunately, the studies for this corona virus are not worth the computers they were typed on, just as they were useless for the Spanish Flu of 1918. The modern studies fail to isolate via centrifuge, and simply mix a tissue a non isolated sample with lab fluids and antiobiotics, which produce exosomes of their own accord after antibiotic contact. This is why they will never use a control in these studies, because it would prove that any sample could create 'virus particles'.

agent

To top it off, these studies again use the fallacious PCR test to 'prove' the virus spread into monkey Vero cells, while never properly isolating the virus! Again, the PCR is not a proper metric, as I will prove below. These virologists have never seen the virus with an electron microscope and observed it multiplying. In fact, generally they're only doing the experiment with computer models, or 'rebuilding' the sample via RT-PCR, which is fallacious metric since they aren't working with the original sample.

Therefore it is impossible to claim the virus is pathogenic.

A lesson on PCR testing:

A PCR test was built for DNA polymerase reaction, it essentially makes copies of DNA, was not built for RNA, and absolutely should NOT be used for detection of a virus according to its inventor. Indeed, Kerry Mullis, the inventor of PCR, said this very thing, and eschewed its use for 'virus' detection.

book

RT PCR claims its amplification method using fluorescence to highlight pathogen population can pin down the number to a single molecule.

However, the test results are off by a factor > 3, as for example if a particular pathogen load is tallied at 80000 the actual number could be 20000 or lesser. Besides, to begin with, one should know the baseline fluorescence number of the of the pathogen in the primary isolate before amplification cycles can begin.

Prior to RT-PCR, the initial steps would entail confirmation of the pathogen from electron microscopy and isolation of pure sample of the germ from alleged diseased tissue. Nothing is definitive about the quantification. It’s primarily mathematical fudge and human subjectivity.

As for the RT-PCR qualitatively identifying specific DNA sequences of the pathogen (in this case, SARSCoV-2 RNA virus) in the primary isolate under scrutiny..the claim is fraught with several limitations like contaminants, cross pathogen activity, pathogen debris, human cellular material, number of cycles, primary and secondary reactive test isolate, fallibility of human judgement etc. There is no simple 'positive or negative' in a PCR test.

As for talking in terms of symptomatic, asymptomatic, positives, negatives, false negatives and false positives via PCR is nonsense and ambiguity. You're either sick, or you're not. Logic alone should tell you that if 1000 people have the 'virus', and only 1 of them is sick, then what they're claiming is a pathogenic virus is NOT the cause of illness.


Conclusion: Spanish Flu And Corona Bologna Hoaxes- BUSTED

explosionTank
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78863940


clappahesrightlovethispost
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78707779
Serbia
05/01/2020 10:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great SPANISH FLU Hoax & Myth- 1918 Study proves Spanish FLU was NOT the result of a contagious airborne virus; history repeats with corona
Exactly the same thing, but Spanish flu was way more deadly.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 75510169
United States
05/01/2020 10:58 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great SPANISH FLU Hoax & Myth- 1918 Study proves Spanish FLU was NOT the result of a contagious airborne virus; history repeats with corona
Exactly the same thing, but Spanish flu was way more deadly.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78707779


deadly?
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 78863940
05/01/2020 11:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great SPANISH FLU Hoax & Myth- 1918 Study proves Spanish FLU was NOT the result of a contagious airborne virus; history repeats with corona
Exactly the same thing, but Spanish flu was way more deadly.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78707779


deadly?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75510169


It was deadly, but it wasn't from a virus. Viruses are poor explanations dreamed up by governments and their medical staffs to cover up toxin damage that they and their corporate cronies cause. It's the perfect scapegoat, we didn't do it, the virus did!
Half Past Midnight

User ID: 78659823
Canada
05/01/2020 11:21 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great SPANISH FLU Hoax & Myth- 1918 Study proves Spanish FLU was NOT the result of a contagious airborne virus; history repeats with corona
Like the old saying goes:

History Repeats Itself.

Because the tyrants figure out what works on us & then repeat it.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78864492
05/01/2020 12:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great SPANISH FLU Hoax & Myth- 1918 Study proves Spanish FLU was NOT the result of a contagious airborne virus; history repeats with corona
Like the old saying goes:

History Repeats Itself.

Because the tyrants figure out what works on us & then repeat it.
 Quoting: Half Past Midnight


hesright
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78864492
05/01/2020 12:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great SPANISH FLU Hoax & Myth- 1918 Study proves Spanish FLU was NOT the result of a contagious airborne virus; history repeats with corona
clappa

Great thread!
theyre doing it again!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 71365124
Poland
05/01/2020 01:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great SPANISH FLU Hoax & Myth- 1918 Study proves Spanish FLU was NOT the result of a contagious airborne virus; history repeats with corona
OP

you need to research MADAGASKAR now

Pubonic PLauge is comming from there every year. Its treated as a bacterical

Russians just dug up some corpses with this virus

5G giving sysmptons, but no virus

Hospitals and test, infecting

treatment not biological


THERE TEHRE IS THE AWNSER!!!


Quick before they scrub
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78849131
United Kingdom
05/01/2020 01:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great SPANISH FLU Hoax & Myth- 1918 Study proves Spanish FLU was NOT the result of a contagious airborne virus; history repeats with corona
Like the old saying goes:

History Repeats Itself.

Because the tyrants figure out what works on us & then repeat it.
 Quoting: Half Past Midnight


Not quite:
First comes a swaying of us into unbelief.
Unbelief in the truth
Leads to never learning to welcome the truth
Then comes being left holding nothing but lies from the liar.

They can absolutely only operate these massive lies on a population that hates the truth.

If if I state the Wikipedia entry for the germ theory: "The germ theory of disease is the currently accepted scientific theory for many diseases. It states that microorganisms known as pathogens or "germs" can lead to disease. These small organisms, too small to see..."

Right there in plain English for all to SEE
how is it fact when it is the CURRENTLY ACCEPTED...theory?
why does media sell it as fact?
what are the other / older beliefs on disease?

All of those questions would lead to research in people that do have a love of the truth. Those who don't, won't ask any of them. They go with it as fact. And therefore support this current plandemic, keep us and drive us into further tyranny and we end up like the Jerusalem that Jesus had to duck in and out of.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 78863940
05/01/2020 01:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great SPANISH FLU Hoax & Myth- 1918 Study proves Spanish FLU was NOT the result of a contagious airborne virus; history repeats with corona
Like the old saying goes:

History Repeats Itself.

Because the tyrants figure out what works on us & then repeat it.
 Quoting: Half Past Midnight


Not quite:
First comes a swaying of us into unbelief.
Unbelief in the truth
Leads to never learning to welcome the truth
Then comes being left holding nothing but lies from the liar.

They can absolutely only operate these massive lies on a population that hates the truth.

If if I state the Wikipedia entry for the germ theory: "The germ theory of disease is the currently accepted scientific theory for many diseases. It states that microorganisms known as pathogens or "germs" can lead to disease. These small organisms, too small to see..."

Right there in plain English for all to SEE
how is it fact when it is the CURRENTLY ACCEPTED...theory?
why does media sell it as fact?
what are the other / older beliefs on disease?

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78849131


Yup, they claim that 'can't find' that darn virus, just pieces of it..after all these years, and after every advancement in technology, they come up with more excuses. Isn't it strange that if they can find a PIECE of the virus in the form of its supposed RNA protein, which would logically be a small portion of it, that they can't find the rest of it?

It's like having the technology to see a fruit-fly in space yet claiming you can't find the moon.

Virologists are essentially ghost hunters. Actually, I shouldn't be rude, ghost hunters probably have more evidence for their craft than virologists.

Do you know that 'Influenza' was first called 'Influencia' as in, the Influence of the Stars?

It generally occurred during certain astronomical cycles and periods of heightened solar activity and sunspots. It only become more common since the 1700's and the advent of electricity. In fact, the old electricians of the 17-1800's all said electrical disease had the symptoms of headache, runny nose, nosebleed, weakness, fatigue, insomnia, vomit, diarrhea, etc. Sound familiar?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78849131
United Kingdom
05/01/2020 03:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great SPANISH FLU Hoax & Myth- 1918 Study proves Spanish FLU was NOT the result of a contagious airborne virus; history repeats with corona
"Virologists are essentially ghost hunters. Actually, I shouldn't be rude, ghost hunters probably have more evidence for their craft than virologists."

Well...now that you say that ....
Dark age and superstitious religion believe in invisible evil spirits floating around causing disease....
So really , the "currently accepted germ theory" is that belief recast, respun and resold in a guise of science....and the people believing science is truth, can't see how religion has been peddled to us wearing yet another mask
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78849131
United Kingdom
05/01/2020 03:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great SPANISH FLU Hoax & Myth- 1918 Study proves Spanish FLU was NOT the result of a contagious airborne virus; history repeats with corona
Two definite camps are forming

Outside viruses, invisible to all except special scientists with multi million dollar special microscopes ...just float around waiting to infect us, and that man can infect each other with those disease causing organisms. Fever, sneezing, coughs etc are symptoms of infection by these viruses. In order to ward off these invisible to all viruses, we can be injected with the very virus and develop immunity....

Man has all the "viruses" inside him already. By viruses, special cells that our bodies produce when we are exposed to toxins and prolonged periods of stress, and that these cells do their job to isolate, confine and expel those toxins by coughing, sneezing and fever etcs. Those symptoms being normal indications that our bodies have been poisoned for example, haven been exposed to an environmental agent
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77768400
05/01/2020 05:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great SPANISH FLU Hoax & Myth- 1918 Study proves Spanish FLU was NOT the result of a contagious airborne virus; history repeats with corona
Two definite camps are forming

Outside viruses, invisible to all except special scientists with multi million dollar special microscopes ...just float around waiting to infect us, and that man can infect each other with those disease causing organisms. Fever, sneezing, coughs etc are symptoms of infection by these viruses. In order to ward off these invisible to all viruses, we can be injected with the very virus and develop immunity....

Man has all the "viruses" inside him already. By viruses, special cells that our bodies produce when we are exposed to toxins and prolonged periods of stress, and that these cells do their job to isolate, confine and expel those toxins by coughing, sneezing and fever etcs. Those symptoms being normal indications that our bodies have been poisoned for example, haven been exposed to an environmental agent
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78849131


hesright
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78724583
United States
05/01/2020 06:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great SPANISH FLU Hoax & Myth- 1918 Study proves Spanish FLU was NOT the result of a contagious airborne virus; history repeats with corona
Impressive. People keep falling for it, why?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78866192
United States
05/01/2020 09:47 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great SPANISH FLU Hoax & Myth- 1918 Study proves Spanish FLU was NOT the result of a contagious airborne virus; history repeats with corona
Impressive. People keep falling for it, why?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78724583


bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78868340
United States
05/02/2020 09:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great SPANISH FLU Hoax & Myth- 1918 Study proves Spanish FLU was NOT the result of a contagious airborne virus; history repeats with corona
Nothing new under the sun.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78818568
Australia
05/02/2020 09:59 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great SPANISH FLU Hoax & Myth- 1918 Study proves Spanish FLU was NOT the result of a contagious airborne virus; history repeats with corona
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78868340
United States
05/02/2020 10:11 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great SPANISH FLU Hoax & Myth- 1918 Study proves Spanish FLU was NOT the result of a contagious airborne virus; history repeats with corona

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78818568


Great video!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77908021
United States
05/02/2020 03:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great SPANISH FLU Hoax & Myth- 1918 Study proves Spanish FLU was NOT the result of a contagious airborne virus; history repeats with corona
I'm reading the book the invisible rainbow now as well, it's very detailed, written by a Doctor who himself had an electrical sensitivity. It proves that most of these modern diseases are the direct result of our modern world's electrification.

Many 'modern' diseases are caused by electrical poisoning and then blamed on some invisible virus. Here's the book if you're interested:

[link to www.amazon.com (secure)]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77742610
United States
05/03/2020 09:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great SPANISH FLU Hoax & Myth- 1918 Study proves Spanish FLU was NOT the result of a contagious airborne virus; history repeats with corona
I'm reading the book the invisible rainbow now as well, it's very detailed, written by a Doctor who himself had an electrical sensitivity. It proves that most of these modern diseases are the direct result of our modern world's electrification.

Many 'modern' diseases are caused by electrical poisoning and then blamed on some invisible virus. Here's the book if you're interested:

[link to www.amazon.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77908021


bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78777628
United States
05/03/2020 09:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great SPANISH FLU Hoax & Myth- 1918 Study proves Spanish FLU was NOT the result of a contagious airborne virus; history repeats with corona
there are newspaper articles that prove many of the procedures implemented now held true even then. for example movie theaters, restaurants and measures to isolate were used.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77742610
United States
05/03/2020 09:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great SPANISH FLU Hoax & Myth- 1918 Study proves Spanish FLU was NOT the result of a contagious airborne virus; history repeats with corona
there are newspaper articles that prove many of the procedures implemented now held true even then. for example movie theaters, restaurants and measures to isolate were used.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78777628


And they were fraudulent then as they are now. Read the study, it's right there. Newpaper articles aren't 'science'.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78013661
United States
05/03/2020 11:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great SPANISH FLU Hoax & Myth- 1918 Study proves Spanish FLU was NOT the result of a contagious airborne virus; history repeats with corona
I'm delighted to see the truth about Spansh Flu getting attention. The same racial eugenicists who foisted that hoax on the world to slaughter millions are up to their old tricks.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78871474
French Guiana
05/03/2020 11:45 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great SPANISH FLU Hoax & Myth- 1918 Study proves Spanish FLU was NOT the result of a contagious airborne virus; history repeats with corona
COViD-19 = Santa Claus
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 46432626
United States
05/03/2020 11:59 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great SPANISH FLU Hoax & Myth- 1918 Study proves Spanish FLU was NOT the result of a contagious airborne virus; history repeats with corona
This is a history lesson.

The following studies prove that the Spanish Flu was another great Hoax perpetuated on the people of the world. A coverup, if you will, of the true cause of illness.


Conclusion: Spanish Flu And Corona Bologna Hoaxes- BUSTED

explosionTank
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78863940



THANK YOU for taking the time to post this extremely coherent, accurate and TRUE summary of the subject.

I have been trying to educate people, but they are all just too brainwashed, so it's like shouting into a tornado.

What we are currently seeing is a psyop on a scale greater than 9/11. It's designed to advance global fascism - PERIOD.

The extreme, outlying cases of lung destruction and organ failure are caused by radio frequency bursts from vans and 5g antennas... NOT NORMAL POWER 5g, BUT HIGH POWER BURSTS. This is the same "collateral damage" seen with the WTC towers falling and killing real people for a fake event.

This is serious and the apes need to wake up because there will be no going back from the loss of freedoms justified by this psyop.


!!!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78017944
United States
05/03/2020 12:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great SPANISH FLU Hoax & Myth- 1918 Study proves Spanish FLU was NOT the result of a contagious airborne virus; history repeats with corona
Their influence goes back before they opened their NYC office in 1872
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78857932
Canada
05/03/2020 12:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great SPANISH FLU Hoax & Myth- 1918 Study proves Spanish FLU was NOT the result of a contagious airborne virus; history repeats with corona
Great info, thanks for posting!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78829674
Australia
05/03/2020 12:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great SPANISH FLU Hoax & Myth- 1918 Study proves Spanish FLU was NOT the result of a contagious airborne virus; history repeats with corona
For a disease that only killed people who were vaccinared, funny how it was worst in countries without vaccination.





GLP