Forced Vax in South Carolina - Law since 1905 - Update in OP | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76621553 Germany 05/11/2020 09:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Crater User ID: 76123437 United Kingdom 05/11/2020 09:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Conner User ID: 74599527 Canada 05/11/2020 09:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You can decide for yourself! Sick of YOUTUBE algorithms controlling your searches? Sick of shadow banning? LBRY! The Blockchain of youtube! [link to lbry.tv (secure)] GET PAID- watch, upload, share! Blockchain, ZERO centralization! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 40203040 United States 05/11/2020 10:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to supreme.justia.com (secure)] It’s already passed Supreme Court ruling years ago. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78446897 United States 05/11/2020 10:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They don't need to. They're called emergency powers and they've been used by almost every president since Lincoln. [link to scholarship.law.missouri.edu (secure)] Besides, the Nuremberg Code doesn't differentiate between 'declared' states of war and de'facto states of war. It applies to all Nations; that was the point of it, It is International Law. 1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; It specifically mentions any form of coercion, duress, or overreaching. Threatening to cut off people's food supply via benefits is most certainly coercion. Let's stop pretending these 'laws' have any legitimacy. They're committing human rights violations and blatant war crimes now. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78612239 United States 05/11/2020 10:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78446897 United States 05/11/2020 10:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 40203040 United States 05/11/2020 10:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76626437 United States 05/11/2020 10:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78777628 United States 05/11/2020 10:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Go down to redneck country and try this with about 10 redneck hunters that can hit a fly at 100 yards. You will need 40 police and 20 swat members to take care of that little job and about 10 ambulances just for the mess they alone are gonna create . [ right ] Quoting: silverbird and then what? maybe a week of extended coverage of their family's grief, and then.....life goes on. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78446897 United States 05/11/2020 10:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78446897 I understand that in essence it really is experimentation, but the argument will stand that it is not so those codes do not apply. It applies to any 'medical procedure'. Since there is no 'sure thing' in medicine, it's all considered 'experimental'. It absolutely applies. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 40203040 United States 05/11/2020 10:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They cannot legitimately command an unproven and novel vaccination that has never been successful and safe be forced on the unwilling. There have been NO successful vaccines for this class of viruses. And there probably will never be. Do you mean for corona viruses or RNA viruses? Because we have had a rabies vaccine since the late 1800s and I’m pretty sure it’s been proven to work. I’m not a virologist or a doctor though so... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75506446 United Kingdom 05/11/2020 10:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | SECTION 44-29-50. Violation of regulation relating to vaccination, screening, or immunization. Quoting: Turtle Flower Any person who shall fail, neglect or refuse to comply with any regulation of the Department of Health and Environmental Control relating to vaccination, screening or immunization shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be fined not more than one hundred dollars or be imprisoned for not more than thirty days. HISTORY: 1962 Code Section 32-578; 1952 Code Section 32-578; 1942 Code Section 5042; 1932 Code Section 1503; Cr. C. '22 Section 451; Cr. C. '12 Section 441; 1905 (24) 871; 1972 (57) 2523. [link to www.scstatehouse.gov (secure)] I live in SC - this is terrifying. Silence is consent. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 40203040 United States 05/11/2020 10:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78446897 I understand that in essence it really is experimentation, but the argument will stand that it is not so those codes do not apply. It applies to any 'medical procedure'. Since there is no 'sure thing' in medicine, it's all considered 'experimental'. It absolutely applies. Most procedures have passed experimental studies before being offered to the public and therefore are no longer considered experimental. I mean I get it, but that’s what the argument will be and when people feel your choices or freedom affects their safety they will throw freedom out every time. If public opinion is on the side of the law, and it will be probably, freedom won’t matter. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77096092 United States 05/11/2020 10:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to mobile.twitter.com (secure)] Robert Costa @costareports Most members tell me blizzard of angry constituent calls were most impt factor in getting the House to sideline the amdt We have to CALL them. Flood them with angry calls |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78446897 United States 05/11/2020 10:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78446897 I understand that in essence it really is experimentation, but the argument will stand that it is not so those codes do not apply. It applies to any 'medical procedure'. Since there is no 'sure thing' in medicine, it's all considered 'experimental'. It absolutely applies. Besides, it was further codified by the Declaration of Helsinki: [link to www.imarcresearch.com (secure)] The Declaration of Helsinki also marked the arrival of “clinical research,” a field that was previously referred to as ‘Human Experimentation’ in the Nuremberg Code. Furthermore, it introduced a caveat to the consideration of the process for informed consent as an ‘essential’ portion of research, as stated in the Nuremberg Code; according to the Declaration of Helsinki, physicians would be asked to obtain consent ‘if at all possible’ and could be allowed to omit a traditional informed consent form when a legally authorized representative is available. [link to www.wma.net (secure)] Unproven Interventions in Clinical Practice 37. In the treatment of an individual patient, where proven interventions do not exist or other known interventions have been ineffective, the physician, after seeking expert advice, with informed consent from the patient or a legally authorised representative, may use an unproven intervention if in the physician’s judgement it offers hope of saving life, re-establishing health or alleviating suffering. This intervention should subsequently be made the object of research, designed to evaluate its safety and efficacy. In all cases, new information must be recorded and, where appropriate, made publicly available. Even these vaccine makers essentially state the Caveat that these vaccines 'may not work'. They are completely unproven. Nurenberg and Helsinki apply. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78446897 United States 05/11/2020 10:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I understand that in essence it really is experimentation, but the argument will stand that it is not so those codes do not apply. It applies to any 'medical procedure'. Since there is no 'sure thing' in medicine, it's all considered 'experimental'. It absolutely applies. Most procedures have passed experimental studies before being offered to the public and therefore are no longer considered experimental. I mean I get it, but that’s what the argument will be and when people feel your choices or freedom affects their safety they will throw freedom out every time. If public opinion is on the side of the law, and it will be probably, freedom won’t matter. Right, I get what 'there' argument will be. However vaccine 'studies' don't rely on any controlled laboratory experimentation or verifiable evidence, they rely only on 'statistics' that are un-reproducable in any other study. Therefore no two studies will show the same result. Therefore they are still 'experimental'. Of course, the traitorous liberal judges will dismiss this evidence in favor of the vaccine makers logical fallacies and public 'law', because that's what they're paid to do, uphold crimes against humanity. I wouldn't go this 'direct' route in court anyway. It's all under the commerce clause, therefore it is inferred that there is a creditor and a debtor. Pay the bill. Another way. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 40203040 United States 05/11/2020 10:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I understand that in essence it really is experimentation, but the argument will stand that it is not so those codes do not apply. It applies to any 'medical procedure'. Since there is no 'sure thing' in medicine, it's all considered 'experimental'. It absolutely applies. Besides, it was further codified by the Declaration of Helsinki: [link to www.imarcresearch.com (secure)] The Declaration of Helsinki also marked the arrival of “clinical research,” a field that was previously referred to as ‘Human Experimentation’ in the Nuremberg Code. Furthermore, it introduced a caveat to the consideration of the process for informed consent as an ‘essential’ portion of research, as stated in the Nuremberg Code; according to the Declaration of Helsinki, physicians would be asked to obtain consent ‘if at all possible’ and could be allowed to omit a traditional informed consent form when a legally authorized representative is available. [link to www.wma.net (secure)] Unproven Interventions in Clinical Practice 37. In the treatment of an individual patient, where proven interventions do not exist or other known interventions have been ineffective, the physician, after seeking expert advice, with informed consent from the patient or a legally authorised representative, may use an unproven intervention if in the physician’s judgement it offers hope of saving life, re-establishing health or alleviating suffering. This intervention should subsequently be made the object of research, designed to evaluate its safety and efficacy. In all cases, new information must be recorded and, where appropriate, made publicly available. Even these vaccine makers essentially state the Caveat that these vaccines 'may not work'. They are completely unproven. Nurenberg and Helsinki apply. parens patriae The State is a legally authorized representative to consent on our behalf if we are deemed unfit to do so ourselves or for our children. And not wanting th vaccine itself could be reason enough to find someone unfit in their eyes. I’m not arguing for this at all, I’m just saying there are no laws on our side and legally speaking they will find a way around it. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78671668 Germany 05/11/2020 10:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The CDC is a privately owned enterprise consisting of a LONG laundry list of donors Established by Congress more than two decades ago, the CDC Foundation is an independent, 501(c)(3) public charity. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77742610 The foundation's job is to fund the CDC with private corporate money. This creates a De Facto private enterprise that works for the benefits of the sponsors, not the American people. The conflicts of interest should be glaring to anyone who takes the time to look. How can a supposed independent agency act for the interests of the people when their paychecks are coming from corporations and wealthy people? [link to www.cdcfoundation.org (secure)] Let's have a look at just a few corporate sponsors of 'your' CDC: Abbott Ireland Academic Hospital Paramaribo Affimedix, Inc. AmazonSmile Foundation American Association for Clinical Chemistry American Type Culture Collection Amgen Foundation Amgen Inc. ARUP Laboratories Atlanta Chapter Daughters of The American Revolution Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade Bayer U.S. LLC BD Beckman Coulter, Inc. Benevity Community Impact Fund Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Biogen MA Inc. Biohit Laboratory Services BioReference Laboratories, Inc. Bloomberg Philanthropies Boditech Med Inc. Boston Children's Hospital Brigham and Women's Hospital Brown University C.D.C. Chapter 1419 NARFE Cargill, Inc. CDC Federal Credit Union Centennial Medical Center Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Centre Hospitalier Universitaire of Liege Cerilliant Corporation Chambers Family Foundation Charities Aid Foundation of America: Carmen H. Villar, MSW Chemux Bioscience, Inc. Chromesystems Instruments & Chemicals GmbH Clarivate Analytics Classy, Inc. Clemson University College of American Pathologists Columbia University Community Foundation of Central Georgia, Inc. Conrad N. Hilton Foundation Covance Central Laboratory Services Delaware Academy of Medicine / Delaware Public Health Association Diagnostics Biochem Canada Inc. DiaSorin Inc. DiaSource Immunoassays SA Diazyme Laboratories Emory University Eurofins Biomnis Euroimmun Medizinische Labordiagnostika AG Eventbrite FIA Foundation Fidelity Charitable Gift Fund: Betensky-Kraut Family Fund Bruce & Susi Willis Gift Fund The Hunter Family Fund Jacobs Family Fund Kaunitz Family Charitable Fund Klepchick Family Fund Kreuter/Katz Family Fund Lisa A. Mills Fund Lubitz/Monroe Charitable Fund Martha and Robert Supnik Charitable Fund Murphy-Gittleman Family Fund The Nancy C. Lee Giving Fund Paul and Beverly Truebig Gift Fund Peter Dull and Judith Tsui Charitable Family Fund Petruzzelli/Herrera Fund Philip I. Kent Charitable Fund Vickery Perniciaro Family Fund Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics Four Seasons Environmental, Inc. Fremont Area Community Foundation, Inc. GAVI Alliance GiveWell GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals S.A. Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc. Global Inc. Good Ventures Foundation Government of Canada Greater Cleveland Community Shares Heartland Assays LLC HONOReform Foundation IBM Employee Services Center Immunodiagnostic Systems Inc. Imperial College London International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease Intervet International B.V. Iodine Global Network IQ Solutions James F. and Sarah T. Fries Foundation James W. Down Company, Inc. JAMF Nation Global Foundation Job-Site Safety Institute Johns Hopkins University King Saud University The Kresge Foundation Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute Luminex Corporation Magee-Womens Research Institute and Foundation Marcel J Vinduska Revocable Trust May P. And Francis L. Abreu Charitable Trust Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research The Merck Foundation Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Microgenics Corporation Monobind Inc. MTM Foundation National Philanthropic Trust Nelson Family Foundation Network for Good Northside Kiwanis Foundation Nutrition International Oak Crest Institute of Science Omaha Community Foundation Open Philanthropy Project Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics Partners HealthCare System, Inc. Pathology Associates Medical Laboratories Pennington Biomedical Research Foundation Pennsylvania State University Pew Charitable Trusts Quest Diagnostics RB Health (US) LLC R-Biopharm Inc. Reckitt Benckiser, Inc. The Regents of the University of New Mexico Richard E. & Marianne B. Kipper Foundation Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Roche Diagnostics Corporation Sabin Vaccine Institute Saul D. Levy Foundation Schwab Charitable Fund: Adler Family Charitable Fund Brody Charitable Fund John Schnitker/Elizabeth Weaver Charitable Fund Karen and Marvin Whaley Fund Ruth J. Katz Charitable Fund Shands/Mulinare Family Charitable Fund SCIEX Sergey Brin Family Foundation Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc. Snibe Diagnostics (Snibe Co., Ltd.) Social Good Fund Taylor and Francis Group, LLC The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta, Inc.: Charles H & Margaret McTier Fund Jeffrey & Carol Koplan Family Fund Robert Yellowlees Family Fund Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. Three Rivers Community Foundation Tosoh Corporation Tri-State Gastroenterology Truist Tull Charitable Foundation UBS Donor-Advised Fund Ullmann Family Foundation UNICEF United Nations Foundation United Way of Central New Mexico United Way of Greater Atlanta, Inc. University of Arizona University of Connecticut University of Georgia University of Louisville University of Michigan University of Minnesota University of New Mexico University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill University of Western Australia Vanguard Charitable: The Stuart H. Hillman Fund Vestergaard Frandsen SA Virginia Commonwealth University Health System Vital Strategies The Walker School Waters Ireland LTD The Wilson Family Foundation Wolters Kluwer Health World Health Organization Zhejiang Disigns Diagnostics [link to www.cdcfoundation.org (secure)] Isn't Plutocracy Great!? AMERICAN worst enemies are privately owned SAME GOES FOR THE FEDERAL RESERVE can't you see who's making you idiots and slaves |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76626437 United States 05/11/2020 10:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They cannot legitimately command an unproven and novel vaccination that has never been successful and safe be forced on the unwilling. There have been NO successful vaccines for this class of viruses. And there probably will never be. Do you mean for corona viruses or RNA viruses? Because we have had a rabies vaccine since the late 1800s and I’m pretty sure it’s been proven to work. I’m not a virologist or a doctor though so... There are no proven safe or effective RNA corona virus vaccines or HIV vaccines and not for the lack of trying. This is what is being discussed and probable mandated. Nobody is suggesting mandated Rabies so thats not in play here. Whether or not there are issues with rabies vaccined effectiveness in humans or not is up to some debate, and may be why its not really recommended in humans. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78446897 United States 05/11/2020 11:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 40203040 I understand that in essence it really is experimentation, but the argument will stand that it is not so those codes do not apply. It applies to any 'medical procedure'. Since there is no 'sure thing' in medicine, it's all considered 'experimental'. It absolutely applies. Besides, it was further codified by the Declaration of Helsinki: [link to www.imarcresearch.com (secure)] The Declaration of Helsinki also marked the arrival of “clinical research,” a field that was previously referred to as ‘Human Experimentation’ in the Nuremberg Code. Furthermore, it introduced a caveat to the consideration of the process for informed consent as an ‘essential’ portion of research, as stated in the Nuremberg Code; according to the Declaration of Helsinki, physicians would be asked to obtain consent ‘if at all possible’ and could be allowed to omit a traditional informed consent form when a legally authorized representative is available. [link to www.wma.net (secure)] Unproven Interventions in Clinical Practice 37. In the treatment of an individual patient, where proven interventions do not exist or other known interventions have been ineffective, the physician, after seeking expert advice, with informed consent from the patient or a legally authorised representative, may use an unproven intervention if in the physician’s judgement it offers hope of saving life, re-establishing health or alleviating suffering. This intervention should subsequently be made the object of research, designed to evaluate its safety and efficacy. In all cases, new information must be recorded and, where appropriate, made publicly available. Even these vaccine makers essentially state the Caveat that these vaccines 'may not work'. They are completely unproven. Nurenberg and Helsinki apply. parens patriae The State is a legally authorized representative to consent on our behalf if we are deemed unfit to do so ourselves or for our children. And not wanting th vaccine itself could be reason enough to find someone unfit in their eyes. I’m not arguing for this at all, I’m just saying there are no laws on our side and legally speaking they will find a way around it. Yes, I agree, the Nazi ideology lives on strongly in America. They used the same types of arguments. However, Nuremberg still doesn't differentiate between children and adults, so this is non sequitur in terms of actual deductive reasoning. Yet we all know there is no law here in the States, only color of law. I understand perfectly what you're saying, the government deems every adult and child an 'infant' in our commercial system. They've become 'Wards of the Court', including adults. I've heard the judge use that term on adult prisoners many times. (a)In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the words “person”, “human being”, “child”, and “individual”, shall include every infant member of the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development. [link to www.law.cornell.edu (secure)] Hmmmm.. so they define only 'infants', no adults, according to any act of Congress. Interesting. Let's examine the Maxim: Inclusio unius est exclusio alterius. The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. ------------------------------- Let's further examine:'Ward of the court': A person, especially an infant or incompetent, placed by the court in the care of a guardian. [link to legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com (secure)] How convenient of them to only include infants in their statutory definition of 'persons'. It doesn't matter anyway, it's all color of law. |
Quadrivium User ID: 77096092 United States 05/11/2020 11:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just typed this up. Feel free to use or modify as needed. Please CALL your reps. Its is important to state that you are a constituent of that legislator by giving your city and state Tim Scott’s name is included below ...but call every representative in your district. I will make another post of phone numbers to call Hi, my name is [NAME] and I'm a constituent from CITY, STATE I'm calling to express my outrage over SECTION 44-29-50 of the Code of Laws as being presented in the SC Code of Laws SECTION 44-29-50. is related to the alleged “Violation of regulation relating to vaccination, screening, or immunization.” This gravely concerns me as a citizen of America because mandatory vaccines infringe upon constitutionally protected religious freedoms. Several religions oppose vaccines and mandatory vaccinations. The First Amendment of the US Constitution states, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." This is established legal restriction on forced vaccines that still allow citizens to exempt from putting poisonous, man-made chemicals in their body. There is no third-party proof that vaccines even work as intended or are safe. Nor do vaccinations prevent contagions, they can be spread regardless if a person is vaccinated. Our Constitutionally protected, God-given Rights, have NO exemption for any emergency situations. And that includes any biological “emergencies.” In SC Marbury vs Madison...the final decision states: ”all laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.” If I choose to allow my body to live naturally and to fight off any disease or contagion that it encounters...that is expressly my Human Right & the pursuit of freedom to do so. My body ...my choice. I urge Senator Tim Scott and his colleagues to reconsider this section and to expressly remove mandatory vaccinations. Thank you for your hard work answering the phones. IF LEAVING A VOICEMAIL: Please leave your full street address to ensure your call is tallied. Calls should take less than a minute. You’ll be speaking to a staffer, so make your point clearly so they can tally your opinion correctly. The provided scripts are useful but you can add your own words.Be respectful. The staffers that pick up the phone aren’t looking to challenge you and you should treat them with the same respect you expect from them, regardless of which party they work for. Last Edited by Quadrivium on 05/11/2020 11:24 AM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76421637 United States 05/11/2020 11:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Quadrivium User ID: 77096092 United States 05/11/2020 11:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just call someone! Script is above or make up your own! It only takes ONE minute! If your reps are different, then either look them up or someone who answers the contacts below can re-route you US Sen Lindsay Graham (R) - 202-224-5972 US Sen Tim Scott (R) - 202-224-6121 Governor Henry McMaster (R) - 803-734-2100 US Rep William Timmons (R) 202-225-6030 State Sen Dwight Loftus (R) 803-212-6100 State rep Adam Morgan (R) Greenville county - 864-517-7068 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75599050 United States 05/11/2020 11:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78356753 United States 05/11/2020 11:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75520410 United States 05/11/2020 11:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77202143 Canada 05/11/2020 11:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | SECTION 44-29-50. Violation of regulation relating to vaccination, screening, or immunization. Quoting: Turtle Flower Any person who shall fail, neglect or refuse to comply with any regulation of the Department of Health and Environmental Control relating to vaccination, screening or immunization shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be fined not more than one hundred dollars or be imprisoned for not more than thirty days. HISTORY: 1962 Code Section 32-578; 1952 Code Section 32-578; 1942 Code Section 5042; 1932 Code Section 1503; Cr. C. '22 Section 451; Cr. C. '12 Section 441; 1905 (24) 871; 1972 (57) 2523. [link to www.scstatehouse.gov (secure)] I live in SC - this is terrifying. Just 100 dollar fine. I guess anybody can afford this new tax. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78067290 Belgium 05/11/2020 11:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | SECTION 44-29-50. Violation of regulation relating to vaccination, screening, or immunization. Quoting: Turtle Flower Any person who shall fail, neglect or refuse to comply with any regulation of the Department of Health and Environmental Control relating to vaccination, screening or immunization shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be fined not more than one hundred dollars or be imprisoned for not more than thirty days. HISTORY: 1962 Code Section 32-578; 1952 Code Section 32-578; 1942 Code Section 5042; 1932 Code Section 1503; Cr. C. '22 Section 451; Cr. C. '12 Section 441; 1905 (24) 871; 1972 (57) 2523. [link to www.scstatehouse.gov (secure)] I live in SC - this is terrifying. What the hell are you worried about? You live in The Land of the Free! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76902245 United States 05/11/2020 11:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |