The results of Europe's lockdown experiment are in

meanwhile “scientists” propose 50 days on, 30 days off coronavirus lockdown strategy. brought to you by the imperial College of fake models. hopefully policy makers do not trust them again this time around.


Scientists propose a 50 days on, 30 days off coronavirus lockdown strategy

[link to www.cnbc.com (secure)]

God will not be mocked.

ENJOY THE CROWN

the data CLEARLY shows that once the lockdowns began the situation got worse.

therefore, how can you ever argue that it helped?

also the data CLEARLY shows that because the WHO declared a pandemic the situation got worse.

the data also clearly shows that every country across the world peaked at the same time.

THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE!

the only way this is possible is if everyone was infected at the same time.

can anyone explain this?!

So lockdown did not help much?

The data would indicate this yes. The majority of the populous should not have to suffer for a small percentage. The only thing we have to fear is fear itself. If you have an underlying condition stay in. If you do not, build up that immunity, do not fear.


Coronavirus: 95% of victims in England hospitals had underlying health conditions

[link to news.sky.com (secure)]


T cells found in coronavirus patients 'bode well' for long-term immunity

Fri, 22 May 2020 00:00 UTC

[link to science.sciencemag.org (secure)]

"stay in, stay safe”. is anyone actually buying what “they” are selling?


Nuremberg Code for Human Experimentation:

1. The VOLUNTARY consent of the human subject is absolutely essential ... without the intervention of any element of FORCE, FRAUD, DECEIT ... and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved (warnings about the possible dangers of vaccine adjuvants), as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision... all inconveniences and HAZARDS to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation...

...

5. No experiment should be conducted, where there is an apriori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur...

6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

7. Proper preparations should be made ... to protect the experimental subject against even REMOTE possibilities of injury, disability, or death.

8. During the course of the experiment, the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end, if he has reached the physical or mental state, where continuation of the experiment seemed to him to be impossible.

Last Edited by Digital Buddha on 05/24/2020 12:22 PM