Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,053 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 162,347
Pageviews Today: 275,495Threads Today: 85Posts Today: 1,710
04:03 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject Governor Cuomo: "It's Trump's fault that I sent sent thousands of confirmed infected into nursing homes
Poster Handle Jake
Post Content
...


Not this one, It contains the HIV Genome, there will

probably never be an effective vaccine that works
 Quoting: Jake


That's bullshit. The paper claiming that was so flawed that it was withdrawm almost two months ago.

#jakenews
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78893689


...


Not this one, It contains the HIV Genome, there will

probably never be an effective vaccine that works
 Quoting: Jake


That's bullshit. The paper claiming that was so flawed that it was withdrawm almost two months ago.

#jakenews
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78893689



It wasn't debunked it was ordered removed

over a dozen people ran the Genome on Blast and

the HIV GP-120 gene is definitely there.
 Quoting: Jake


Such comical bullshit. You are still trying to push that crap? Show us your proof if it was not withdrawn by the authors.

February 3rd:

Quick retraction of a faulty coronavirus paper was a good moment for science

As fears of the novel coronavirus 2019-nCoV continued to spread last Friday, an inflammatory new paper appeared on bioRxiv, a preprint server, where scientists post work that hasn’t been vetted.

Titled “Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag,” the paper claimed to find similarities between the new coronavirus and HIV, the virus that causes AIDS. The use of the word “uncanny” in the title, together with “unlikely to be fortuitous” in the abstract, led some to think that the authors were suggesting the virus had somehow been engineered by humans.

The paper, from academic institutions in New Delhi, India, was critical and alarming, if true. Except that it wasn’t.

The paper was almost immediately withdrawn by the authors, but not before plenty of handwringing from researchers who complained that the appearance of such shoddy work on a preprint server without vetting by peer reviewers is precisely why the hoary old model of science publishing is better at keeping junk science out of the literature.


[link to www.statnews.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78893689


Bullshit over a dozen people ran the genome on blast

and published them on youtube.

Youtube deleted them.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:







GLP